vh 2806abac44 feat(#17): web Bifrost-bind — server side (slice 3c, INV-008 lockstep complete)
Slice 3c of issue #17 — the web surface of the bind trigger, server side. Closes
the INV-008 lockstep (CLI + TUI + web all carry the bind now). Implements the
contract's "web bind split": the browser selects only the PLANE; the consumer key
and the Worldtree-visible host are SERVER-HELD config and never reach the browser.

- create_app gains bifrost_consumer_key + bifrost_visible_host (server-held,
  from env via the entrypoint: RATATOSKR_BIFROST_CONSUMER_KEY /
  RATATOSKR_PROVIDER_VISIBLE_HOST).
- _create_session_endpoint reads an optional `bifrost_plane` from the browser
  body, builds the BifrostBinding SERVER-SIDE via endpoint_for_plane(plane,
  visible_host), and calls create_session(bifrost=, consumer_key=). The 201
  response echoes bound-state {plane, endpoint, status: bound} for the UI
  indicator — never the key (INV-008/INV-009).
- Error routing: invalid plane / unconfigured server -> 400; BifrostHandshakeFailed
  -> 502 {bifrost_error}; BifrostConsumerKeyMissing (server misconfig) -> 400.

5 new web bind tests (server constructs binding + key-never-leaks + upstream
carries bifrost body + consumer-key bearer; unconfigured -> 400; invalid plane;
handshake 502; no-plane unbound regression). Full suite 470 green; added lines
ruff + mypy clean (pre-existing web-file backlog untouched).

Follow-on: the index.html plane selector (UI trigger) — the server capability is
complete and TDD'd; the browser-side dropdown is a thin separate change.

LIVE-SMOKE PROVEN (this session): the CLI bind drove a bound sindra session
against personal Worldtree :8081 -> handshake 200 -> the op-feed captured 2
recall searches correlated to the EXACT bound session_id (2c0c7482), with the
real #297/#298 union-recall scopes. Bind + observe proven end-to-end live.
2026-06-18 01:02:14 -07:00

Ratatoskr

A Worldtree Conversation API debug TUI. Runs up and down Worldtree's API surface — sessions, turns, persona, tools, admin events, Bifrost state — carrying messages between layers. Like the squirrel.

The product is the observability surface; chat is the input mechanism. Devs run Ratatoskr against a local Worldtree to watch a turn flow through every layer of the system, side-by-side, in one terminal.

Status

v0 scaffold. Design locked; implementation hasn't started. The dev team owns the implementation pass.

Read in this order

  1. docs/design-brief.md — the locked design. Read this first. Every architectural decision is recorded with its rationale, the alternatives considered, and (where relevant) the operator's lock-in moment.
  2. docs/SPEC-PIN.md — what Worldtree spec version Ratatoskr is built against, where the vendored snapshot lives, and how to bump the pin.
  3. docs/conversation-api-spec.md — the vendored Worldtree spec snapshot. Read this to understand the API surface Ratatoskr consumes. Do not import anything from a Worldtree checkout — the boundary is the spec, not the code. See docs/design-brief.md §2.
  4. CLAUDE.md — Claude Code conventions for this repo (mostly inherited from the Corviduo template).
  5. persistent-memory.md — durable intent across context resets. Update as decisions and state evolve.

Quickstart

# 1. Environment
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"

# 2. Verify the spec pin
cat docs/SPEC-PIN.md   # documented Worldtree SHA + bump procedure

# 3. Tests (none yet; scaffold only)
uv run pytest

# 4. Run against a local Worldtree (once implementation lands)
# Worldtree must be running:  python -m core.conversation_api
ratatoskr --agent mimir

What this repo is NOT

  • NOT a polished consumer for Worldtree's end-users — that's the web app.
  • NOT a Worldtree admin tool — admin CLI is separate (sessions_cli.py lives in Worldtree).
  • NOT a featuretracking shadow of the web app — when the Conversation API surface grows, Ratatoskr does not necessarily grow with it.
  • NOT a remote-Worldtree debug client — file-tail surfaces (persona log, server log) assume local-dev posture.

The full negative-clause list lives in docs/design-brief.md §6.

Boundary rule

Ratatoskr depends on three things only:

  • httpx + httpx-sse (network layer)
  • textual (TUI framework)
  • Worldtree's published Conversation API spec at the pinned SHA

Hard rule: no imports from a Worldtree checkout. No core.* imports, no from worldtree.*, no shared models, no submodule of Worldtree. The spec is the entire surface. Boundary smoke test at tests/test_no_worldtree_imports.py enforces this in CI.

Version-skew strategy

The dev team is decoupled from Worldtree's dev team. To detect drift when Worldtree changes the API:

  1. Spec-version pin in pyproject.toml (worldtree-spec-rev). Bump explicitly; bumps are a tracked action.
  2. Recorded-SSE snapshot tests at tests/snapshots/. Captured against a live Worldtree; replayed in CI. Re-record after every pin bump.
  3. Conformance smoke test — boots Worldtree via Docker compose in CI, runs a one-turn happy path. Catches integration-level drift.

See docs/SPEC-PIN.md for the bump procedure.

Consumer-side discoveries

If you find a spec gap, ambiguity, or missing-but-needed endpoint while working on Ratatoskr: route the discovery back to worldtree-dev via althing rather than via PR on Worldtree directly. The separate-team boundary is intentional and helps catch spec gaps that an in-tree consumer would paper over.

  • Worldtree — the API Ratatoskr consumes
  • brokkr-smithy — authored this design brief
  • Skaldsong — another Worldtree API consumer (Python; render-and-aggregate pattern)
  • mead-hall — another Worldtree API consumer (TypeScript; server-side broker)
S
Description
No description provided
Readme 20 MiB
Languages
Python 82%
HTML 17.6%
Shell 0.4%