Browser-based debug companion to the Ratatoskr TUI, reusing the
existing wire-layer modules unchanged. Same five surfaces (transcript,
thinking, tools, debug, persona) over the same Worldtree Conversation
API SSE wire, viewable from any device on the operator's LAN.
Per docs/contracts/issues/16.contract.md (full v2.1 module contract
with 11 FN blocks + 9 invariants + Heid panel review pass merged).
Architecture:
- New module `ratatoskr.web` with `server.py` (Starlette app, ~250 LOC),
`entrypoint.py` (lazy-import gate, ~100 LOC), `static/index.html`
(single-page vanilla JS UI, ~360 LOC)
- Optional-deps group `[web]` = starlette + uvicorn[standard]; dev
pulls these in transitively
- New console script `ratatoskr-web`
- Streaming via browser-native `EventSource` GET; prompt-submit is a
separate POST (load-bearing Hulda finding from R13 panel — EventSource
is GET-only)
- Small in-memory turn registry maps (session_id, turn_id) → upstream
request handle for cancel + browser-disconnect cleanup
Endpoint surface (9 routes):
- `GET /` → static index.html
- `GET /static/*` → static assets
- `GET /version` → {"ratatoskr": "<version>"}
- `GET /api/agents` → upstream /agents + local Tier 3 merge
- `POST /api/sessions` → upstream POST /sessions
- `GET /api/agents/{id}/persona_state` → upstream persona-state
- `POST /api/turns/{sid}` → allocate turn_id, register in turn registry
- `GET /api/turns/{sid}/stream?turn_id=N` → proxy upstream SSE to browser
- `POST /api/turns/{sid}/cancel?turn_id=N` → upstream cancel
Trust model: internal LAN debug surface. Binds 0.0.0.0:8765 default;
no auth, no CORS guard (operator direction). What stays disciplined
regardless of network trust:
- Transcript HTML-escapes assistant content (INV-004 — model output
is untrusted text; adversarial HTML must not execute in browser)
- Upstream API key never reaches browser DOM (INV-003 — proxy-only)
Lifecycle:
- Browser disconnect mid-stream → upstream cancel (INV-005;
asyncio.CancelledError caught in stream handler)
- Server Ctrl-C → lifespan shutdown drains turn registry within 5s
budget (INV-006; structured-log line on timeout)
Tests (37 new, 356 total; previous 319 baseline preserved):
- tests/test_web_server.py (23 cases): endpoint contract via Starlette
TestClient + respx mocks; covers each endpoint, browser-disconnect →
upstream cancel, lifespan shutdown draining the registry
- tests/test_web_presentation_contract.py (11 cases): proxy
serialization matches tests/fixtures/presentation_contract.json
for one of each Event type — drift detection between server-side
serializer and the JS presenter without forcing a shared abstraction
- tests/test_web_packaging.py (4 cases): static asset packaging via
importlib.resources; AST-checked lazy-import discipline (no top-
level starlette/uvicorn import in entrypoint.py); missing-API-key
exit-11 path; missing-extras exit-12 path
Provenance:
- Scope v1 → Heid panel review (Gróa + Hulda, R13) → 8 load-bearing
corrections (POST→GET split, Starlette > FastAPI, lazy-import
discipline, browser-disconnect → upstream cancel, presentation-
contract fixture, error event contract, static-asset packaging,
escaped plain-text Markdown deferred) merged into scope v2
- Operator direction: internal-LAN debug surface; auth + CORS
deliberately omitted
Not yet (deferred to v0.16.x+):
- Cross-reload session resume via Last-Event-ID
- Tier 3 lifecycle UI (define/patch/delete in browser)
- Markdown rendering with vendored safe-subset renderer
- TLS + real auth (only if a non-LAN use case ever surfaces)
Ratatoskr
A Worldtree Conversation API debug TUI. Runs up and down Worldtree's API surface — sessions, turns, persona, tools, admin events, Bifrost state — carrying messages between layers. Like the squirrel.
The product is the observability surface; chat is the input mechanism. Devs run Ratatoskr against a local Worldtree to watch a turn flow through every layer of the system, side-by-side, in one terminal.
Status
v0 scaffold. Design locked; implementation hasn't started. The dev team owns the implementation pass.
Read in this order
docs/design-brief.md— the locked design. Read this first. Every architectural decision is recorded with its rationale, the alternatives considered, and (where relevant) the operator's lock-in moment.docs/SPEC-PIN.md— what Worldtree spec version Ratatoskr is built against, where the vendored snapshot lives, and how to bump the pin.docs/conversation-api-spec.md— the vendored Worldtree spec snapshot. Read this to understand the API surface Ratatoskr consumes. Do not import anything from a Worldtree checkout — the boundary is the spec, not the code. Seedocs/design-brief.md§2.CLAUDE.md— Claude Code conventions for this repo (mostly inherited from the Corviduo template).persistent-memory.md— durable intent across context resets. Update as decisions and state evolve.
Quickstart
# 1. Environment
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# 2. Verify the spec pin
cat docs/SPEC-PIN.md # documented Worldtree SHA + bump procedure
# 3. Tests (none yet; scaffold only)
uv run pytest
# 4. Run against a local Worldtree (once implementation lands)
# Worldtree must be running: python -m core.conversation_api
ratatoskr --agent mimir
What this repo is NOT
- NOT a polished consumer for Worldtree's end-users — that's the web app.
- NOT a Worldtree admin tool — admin CLI is separate (
sessions_cli.pylives in Worldtree). - NOT a featuretracking shadow of the web app — when the Conversation API surface grows, Ratatoskr does not necessarily grow with it.
- NOT a remote-Worldtree debug client — file-tail surfaces (persona log, server log) assume local-dev posture.
The full negative-clause list lives in docs/design-brief.md §6.
Boundary rule
Ratatoskr depends on three things only:
httpx+httpx-sse(network layer)textual(TUI framework)- Worldtree's published Conversation API spec at the pinned SHA
Hard rule: no imports from a Worldtree checkout. No core.* imports,
no from worldtree.*, no shared models, no submodule of Worldtree. The
spec is the entire surface. Boundary smoke test at tests/test_no_worldtree_imports.py
enforces this in CI.
Version-skew strategy
The dev team is decoupled from Worldtree's dev team. To detect drift when Worldtree changes the API:
- Spec-version pin in
pyproject.toml(worldtree-spec-rev). Bump explicitly; bumps are a tracked action. - Recorded-SSE snapshot tests at
tests/snapshots/. Captured against a live Worldtree; replayed in CI. Re-record after every pin bump. - Conformance smoke test — boots Worldtree via Docker compose in CI, runs a one-turn happy path. Catches integration-level drift.
See docs/SPEC-PIN.md for the bump procedure.
Consumer-side discoveries
If you find a spec gap, ambiguity, or missing-but-needed endpoint while working on Ratatoskr: route the discovery back to worldtree-dev via althing rather than via PR on Worldtree directly. The separate-team boundary is intentional and helps catch spec gaps that an in-tree consumer would paper over.
Related repos
- Worldtree — the API Ratatoskr consumes
- brokkr-smithy — authored this design brief
- Skaldsong — another Worldtree API consumer (Python; render-and-aggregate pattern)
- mead-hall — another Worldtree API consumer (TypeScript; server-side broker)