54 contract-listed tests authored + GREEN per the vertical-slice ordering (_parse_args → _render_event → _cancel_and_log → _run_turn → _amain → main). 117/117 tests GREEN suite-wide; ruff clean. The _run_turn race-loop is the load-bearing piece. Per iteration, the await on the next event is raced against sigint_event.wait() when NOT cancelling. Once SIGINT fires (with last_turn_id known), _cancel_and_log is spawned, cancelling=True flips, and subsequent iterations skip wait()-task creation entirely — the bug Volva flagged in contract review would otherwise busy-wake on the already-set event each iteration. Implementation notes: - _UsageErrorParser subclasses argparse.ArgumentParser and overrides error() to raise _ArgparseError instead of calling sys.exit; _parse_args catches and re-raises as UsageError per the contract's ERROR_ROUTING. - _GatedStream test helper (custom httpx.AsyncByteStream that pauses on asyncio.Event entries) makes SIGINT-mid-stream tests deterministic without sleep-based timing — gates release via side-channels (the cancel-mock sets an event when its endpoint is observed). - _sse_resp test helper wraps respx Response with the text/event-stream content-type, dedupes the boilerplate across the 13 _run_turn tests. - Strong-ref cancel_task local in _run_turn holds the fire-and-forget cancel task to suppress RUF006 / asyncio GC warning. One in-flight contract amendment during TDD: no_busy_loop_after_cancel test description originally said "exactly ONE wait()-shaped task" but the natural race-loop shape produces 2 (iter 1 raced w/ text, iter 2 raced w/ sigint → flipped cancelling; iter 3+ skipped). Amended to "TWO total wait() coroutines" with rationale; the busy-loop check is preserved (iter 3+ MUST skip). Persistent-memory updated per the commit-along rule: new module landed, recent-decisions log entries for #3 (contract + Volva paraphrase + TDD), next natural moves rotated to /volva-code-review on the implementation.
Ratatoskr
A Worldtree Conversation API debug TUI. Runs up and down Worldtree's API surface — sessions, turns, persona, tools, admin events, Bifrost state — carrying messages between layers. Like the squirrel.
The product is the observability surface; chat is the input mechanism. Devs run Ratatoskr against a local Worldtree to watch a turn flow through every layer of the system, side-by-side, in one terminal.
Status
v0 scaffold. Design locked; implementation hasn't started. The dev team owns the implementation pass.
Read in this order
docs/design-brief.md— the locked design. Read this first. Every architectural decision is recorded with its rationale, the alternatives considered, and (where relevant) the operator's lock-in moment.docs/SPEC-PIN.md— what Worldtree spec version Ratatoskr is built against, where the vendored snapshot lives, and how to bump the pin.docs/conversation-api-spec.md— the vendored Worldtree spec snapshot. Read this to understand the API surface Ratatoskr consumes. Do not import anything from a Worldtree checkout — the boundary is the spec, not the code. Seedocs/design-brief.md§2.CLAUDE.md— Claude Code conventions for this repo (mostly inherited from the Corviduo template).persistent-memory.md— durable intent across context resets. Update as decisions and state evolve.
Quickstart
# 1. Environment
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# 2. Verify the spec pin
cat docs/SPEC-PIN.md # documented Worldtree SHA + bump procedure
# 3. Tests (none yet; scaffold only)
uv run pytest
# 4. Run against a local Worldtree (once implementation lands)
# Worldtree must be running: python -m core.conversation_api
ratatoskr --agent mimir
What this repo is NOT
- NOT a polished consumer for Worldtree's end-users — that's the web app.
- NOT a Worldtree admin tool — admin CLI is separate (
sessions_cli.pylives in Worldtree). - NOT a featuretracking shadow of the web app — when the Conversation API surface grows, Ratatoskr does not necessarily grow with it.
- NOT a remote-Worldtree debug client — file-tail surfaces (persona log, server log) assume local-dev posture.
The full negative-clause list lives in docs/design-brief.md §6.
Boundary rule
Ratatoskr depends on three things only:
httpx+httpx-sse(network layer)textual(TUI framework)- Worldtree's published Conversation API spec at the pinned SHA
Hard rule: no imports from a Worldtree checkout. No core.* imports,
no from worldtree.*, no shared models, no submodule of Worldtree. The
spec is the entire surface. Boundary smoke test at tests/test_no_worldtree_imports.py
enforces this in CI.
Version-skew strategy
The dev team is decoupled from Worldtree's dev team. To detect drift when Worldtree changes the API:
- Spec-version pin in
pyproject.toml(worldtree-spec-rev). Bump explicitly; bumps are a tracked action. - Recorded-SSE snapshot tests at
tests/snapshots/. Captured against a live Worldtree; replayed in CI. Re-record after every pin bump. - Conformance smoke test — boots Worldtree via Docker compose in CI, runs a one-turn happy path. Catches integration-level drift.
See docs/SPEC-PIN.md for the bump procedure.
Consumer-side discoveries
If you find a spec gap, ambiguity, or missing-but-needed endpoint while working on Ratatoskr: route the discovery back to worldtree-dev via althing rather than via PR on Worldtree directly. The separate-team boundary is intentional and helps catch spec gaps that an in-tree consumer would paper over.
Related repos
- Worldtree — the API Ratatoskr consumes
- brokkr-smithy — authored this design brief
- Skaldsong — another Worldtree API consumer (Python; render-and-aggregate pattern)
- mead-hall — another Worldtree API consumer (TypeScript; server-side broker)