Bundles initial TDD impl + Volva-code-review F1/F3 amendments. sse_client.py: - New MalformedSseData(raw) exception; truncates raw to 200 chars at __init__ (mirrors MalformedSseId.raw[:64] precedent). - _iter_events gains `if sse.data == '': continue` BEFORE _parse_sse_id. Empty-data frames are silently skipped per issue #7 INV-001 (keepalive semantics). Empty-data + bad-id is still a keepalive; intentional ordering, don't reorder. - _iter_events json.loads(sse.data) now wrapped — JSONDecodeError → MalformedSseData(raw=sse.data). cli.py: - Imports MalformedSseData; _run_turn ERROR_ROUTING gains the case → stderr `[malformed_sse_data] raw={exc.raw!r}` + exit 22 (protocol- failure bucket, same as MalformedSseId/TurnIdFlip). tui.py: - Imports MalformedSseData; _stream_turn_worker ERROR_ROUTING gains the case → transcript label; finally block restores state→idle per INV-008 (mid-session errors don't exit the app). Tests (6 new): - test_sse_client.py: empty_data_skipped (tracer — 4 frames in, 3 events out), malformed_data_raises, whitespace_data_raises, malformed_data_truncation, AND empty_data_skip_preserves_last_seen_sse_id (F1 from Volva code-review — drop-after-empty probes internal last_sse_id non-advancement via SseConnectionDropped.last_seen_sse_id). - test_cli.py: malformed_sse_data (tightened to assert exact `[malformed_sse_data] raw='not-json'` shape per F3), malformed_sse_data_truncation (5000-char payload — verifies truncation carries through presenter rendering, F3). - test_tui.py: malformed_sse_data_returns_to_idle (state→idle per INV-008; app does NOT exit). Smoke validation (2026-05-22): the original crashing prompt ("what about system 1 and system 2 framing?") now completes cleanly end-to-end. mimir streamed 3193 tokens (50 seconds, 374980-token context), `[done] turn_id=96 duration_ms=50436`. Empty-data frames somewhere in the stream silently skipped; no crash. 172/172 tests GREEN; ruff clean; all 5 issue contracts (#1, #3, #4, #5, #7) drift-check clean. Persistent-memory updated per the commit-along rule: status reflects v0+#7 milestone; new dated decisions for #5/#6/#7 filing + #7 implementation; foot-gun entry for unguarded json.loads(sse.data).
Ratatoskr
A Worldtree Conversation API debug TUI. Runs up and down Worldtree's API surface — sessions, turns, persona, tools, admin events, Bifrost state — carrying messages between layers. Like the squirrel.
The product is the observability surface; chat is the input mechanism. Devs run Ratatoskr against a local Worldtree to watch a turn flow through every layer of the system, side-by-side, in one terminal.
Status
v0 scaffold. Design locked; implementation hasn't started. The dev team owns the implementation pass.
Read in this order
docs/design-brief.md— the locked design. Read this first. Every architectural decision is recorded with its rationale, the alternatives considered, and (where relevant) the operator's lock-in moment.docs/SPEC-PIN.md— what Worldtree spec version Ratatoskr is built against, where the vendored snapshot lives, and how to bump the pin.docs/conversation-api-spec.md— the vendored Worldtree spec snapshot. Read this to understand the API surface Ratatoskr consumes. Do not import anything from a Worldtree checkout — the boundary is the spec, not the code. Seedocs/design-brief.md§2.CLAUDE.md— Claude Code conventions for this repo (mostly inherited from the Corviduo template).persistent-memory.md— durable intent across context resets. Update as decisions and state evolve.
Quickstart
# 1. Environment
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# 2. Verify the spec pin
cat docs/SPEC-PIN.md # documented Worldtree SHA + bump procedure
# 3. Tests (none yet; scaffold only)
uv run pytest
# 4. Run against a local Worldtree (once implementation lands)
# Worldtree must be running: python -m core.conversation_api
ratatoskr --agent mimir
What this repo is NOT
- NOT a polished consumer for Worldtree's end-users — that's the web app.
- NOT a Worldtree admin tool — admin CLI is separate (
sessions_cli.pylives in Worldtree). - NOT a featuretracking shadow of the web app — when the Conversation API surface grows, Ratatoskr does not necessarily grow with it.
- NOT a remote-Worldtree debug client — file-tail surfaces (persona log, server log) assume local-dev posture.
The full negative-clause list lives in docs/design-brief.md §6.
Boundary rule
Ratatoskr depends on three things only:
httpx+httpx-sse(network layer)textual(TUI framework)- Worldtree's published Conversation API spec at the pinned SHA
Hard rule: no imports from a Worldtree checkout. No core.* imports,
no from worldtree.*, no shared models, no submodule of Worldtree. The
spec is the entire surface. Boundary smoke test at tests/test_no_worldtree_imports.py
enforces this in CI.
Version-skew strategy
The dev team is decoupled from Worldtree's dev team. To detect drift when Worldtree changes the API:
- Spec-version pin in
pyproject.toml(worldtree-spec-rev). Bump explicitly; bumps are a tracked action. - Recorded-SSE snapshot tests at
tests/snapshots/. Captured against a live Worldtree; replayed in CI. Re-record after every pin bump. - Conformance smoke test — boots Worldtree via Docker compose in CI, runs a one-turn happy path. Catches integration-level drift.
See docs/SPEC-PIN.md for the bump procedure.
Consumer-side discoveries
If you find a spec gap, ambiguity, or missing-but-needed endpoint while working on Ratatoskr: route the discovery back to worldtree-dev via althing rather than via PR on Worldtree directly. The separate-team boundary is intentional and helps catch spec gaps that an in-tree consumer would paper over.
Related repos
- Worldtree — the API Ratatoskr consumes
- brokkr-smithy — authored this design brief
- Skaldsong — another Worldtree API consumer (Python; render-and-aggregate pattern)
- mead-hall — another Worldtree API consumer (TypeScript; server-side broker)