Volva's code-spec review (thread 01KS4CP6ZZ1F) surfaced four code-vs-
contract drift findings on the TDD-passing implementation. All four
addressed here; no contract amendments required.
1. _iter_events fell off the end of aiter_sse() normally on clean EOF
before any Done/Error/Cancelled. Per INV-001 the iterator MUST NOT
raise StopAsyncIteration before a terminal event unless the HTTP
connection drops, in which case it raises SseConnectionDropped.
Clean EOF before terminal is the same semantic — the stream ended
without delivering its contracted invariant. Fix: track terminal_seen
inside _iter_events; after the async-for completes, if not seen,
raise SseConnectionDropped(last_seen_sse_id=...). Two new tests:
test_clean_eof_before_terminal (one text then EOF) and
test_zero_event_eof (empty stream — last_seen_sse_id is None).
2. SseConnectFailed and CancelFailed both store .body without
truncation; ERROR_ROUTING specifies resp.read()[:1024]. Fix
truncates in each exception's __init__ before storing. New test
test_connect_failed_body_truncated (503 + 5000-byte body → 1024)
and test_cancel_failed_truncates_body (same shape on cancel).
3. _parse_sse_id PRE-001 specifies `assert isinstance(raw, str)`.
Previous code called raw.split(":") directly, which raises an
incidental AttributeError on non-str inputs — not the contracted
precondition path. Fix adds the assert. New test
test_non_string_input covers int and None.
4. Cancel ERROR_ROUTING said httpx.HTTPStatusError other status →
CancelFailed, but no test exercised the branch. test_cancel_failed_
truncates_body covers this (above) — single test double-covers
findings 2 and 4.
43 tests GREEN (42 sse_client + boundary smoke); ruff clean.
Meta-note from Volva: TDD caught the main happy/adversarial SSE shape,
resume header/body, turn-id flip, and cancel races. The remaining
misses were "negative space" cases (clean premature EOF, exception
payload truncation, untested generic cancel branch). Calibration
evidence that cross-model review pulls weight on what same-model
TDD's hypothesis-space doesn't probe.
Ratatoskr
A Worldtree Conversation API debug TUI. Runs up and down Worldtree's API surface — sessions, turns, persona, tools, admin events, Bifrost state — carrying messages between layers. Like the squirrel.
The product is the observability surface; chat is the input mechanism. Devs run Ratatoskr against a local Worldtree to watch a turn flow through every layer of the system, side-by-side, in one terminal.
Status
v0 scaffold. Design locked; implementation hasn't started. The dev team owns the implementation pass.
Read in this order
docs/design-brief.md— the locked design. Read this first. Every architectural decision is recorded with its rationale, the alternatives considered, and (where relevant) the operator's lock-in moment.docs/SPEC-PIN.md— what Worldtree spec version Ratatoskr is built against, where the vendored snapshot lives, and how to bump the pin.docs/conversation-api-spec.md— the vendored Worldtree spec snapshot. Read this to understand the API surface Ratatoskr consumes. Do not import anything from a Worldtree checkout — the boundary is the spec, not the code. Seedocs/design-brief.md§2.CLAUDE.md— Claude Code conventions for this repo (mostly inherited from the Corviduo template).persistent-memory.md— durable intent across context resets. Update as decisions and state evolve.
Quickstart
# 1. Environment
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"
# 2. Verify the spec pin
cat docs/SPEC-PIN.md # documented Worldtree SHA + bump procedure
# 3. Tests (none yet; scaffold only)
uv run pytest
# 4. Run against a local Worldtree (once implementation lands)
# Worldtree must be running: python -m core.conversation_api
ratatoskr --agent mimir
What this repo is NOT
- NOT a polished consumer for Worldtree's end-users — that's the web app.
- NOT a Worldtree admin tool — admin CLI is separate (
sessions_cli.pylives in Worldtree). - NOT a featuretracking shadow of the web app — when the Conversation API surface grows, Ratatoskr does not necessarily grow with it.
- NOT a remote-Worldtree debug client — file-tail surfaces (persona log, server log) assume local-dev posture.
The full negative-clause list lives in docs/design-brief.md §6.
Boundary rule
Ratatoskr depends on three things only:
httpx+httpx-sse(network layer)textual(TUI framework)- Worldtree's published Conversation API spec at the pinned SHA
Hard rule: no imports from a Worldtree checkout. No core.* imports,
no from worldtree.*, no shared models, no submodule of Worldtree. The
spec is the entire surface. Boundary smoke test at tests/test_no_worldtree_imports.py
enforces this in CI.
Version-skew strategy
The dev team is decoupled from Worldtree's dev team. To detect drift when Worldtree changes the API:
- Spec-version pin in
pyproject.toml(worldtree-spec-rev). Bump explicitly; bumps are a tracked action. - Recorded-SSE snapshot tests at
tests/snapshots/. Captured against a live Worldtree; replayed in CI. Re-record after every pin bump. - Conformance smoke test — boots Worldtree via Docker compose in CI, runs a one-turn happy path. Catches integration-level drift.
See docs/SPEC-PIN.md for the bump procedure.
Consumer-side discoveries
If you find a spec gap, ambiguity, or missing-but-needed endpoint while working on Ratatoskr: route the discovery back to worldtree-dev via althing rather than via PR on Worldtree directly. The separate-team boundary is intentional and helps catch spec gaps that an in-tree consumer would paper over.
Related repos
- Worldtree — the API Ratatoskr consumes
- brokkr-smithy — authored this design brief
- Skaldsong — another Worldtree API consumer (Python; render-and-aggregate pattern)
- mead-hall — another Worldtree API consumer (TypeScript; server-side broker)