vh
ff1f9ca1e8
- #368 (user,character) memory silo test DONE + PASSED live (WT b127): write-side conjunctive {end_user,agent_self} scoping + read-side cross- character isolation both proven end-to-end; betty (throwaway) deleted, Sindra intact. Full record in persistent-memory.d/2026-07-18-368-silo- test-passed.md. Retired the stale "silo test in progress" in-flight blocks. - Two-tier migration: split 152 over-threshold dated entries into persistent-memory.d/ detail files, leaving one-line pointers in the index (startup load ~196KB -> ~53KB; bodies now load on demand). - Tier-3 stores scrubbed clean (memory 0 / affect 0, provider restarted empty); persistent-memory + detail file updated to reflect the scrub.
2 lines
758 B
Markdown
2 lines
758 B
Markdown
`[2026-06-18]` **FR-1 RESOLVED — the composite premise was unverified, now wire-proven: single-endpoint, caps-routed.** The Heid panel's sharpest catch (Regin): "advertise both caps → Worldtree dispatches both planes to one endpoint" was an ASSUMPTION about WT dispatch, stated as fact. worldtree-dev verified IN CODE: one `BifrostClient` per session (single `_endpoint_url`), handshake `capabilities_granted` parsed INDEPENDENTLY into memory+affect sets, both stores attach off the SAME endpoint iff their cap was granted (`service.py:2597/2703-2713/2745-2751`, `bifrost_client.py ~357-369`; tests `test_tier3_bifrost_{memory,affect}_routing.py`). So D1 is **bifrost-only, ZERO Worldtree change** — #18's "no WT change needed" assumption was correct.
|