Files
ratatoskr/persistent-memory.d/2026-06-15-diagnostic-our-recall-search-is-sound-the-cro.md
T
vh ff1f9ca1e8 memory: /snapshot — #368 silo test passed; two-tier migration; stores scrubbed
- #368 (user,character) memory silo test DONE + PASSED live (WT b127):
  write-side conjunctive {end_user,agent_self} scoping + read-side cross-
  character isolation both proven end-to-end; betty (throwaway) deleted,
  Sindra intact. Full record in persistent-memory.d/2026-07-18-368-silo-
  test-passed.md. Retired the stale "silo test in progress" in-flight blocks.
- Two-tier migration: split 152 over-threshold dated entries into
  persistent-memory.d/ detail files, leaving one-line pointers in the index
  (startup load ~196KB -> ~53KB; bodies now load on demand).
- Tier-3 stores scrubbed clean (memory 0 / affect 0, provider restarted
  empty); persistent-memory + detail file updated to reflect the scrub.
2026-07-17 21:39:18 -07:00

2 lines
585 B
Markdown

`[2026-06-15]` **Diagnostic: our recall-search is SOUND — the cross-session recall gap is UPSTREAM, and it caught an upstream bug.** Embedded the recall query via gateway `qwen3-embedding` + searched our live store directly → the fact recalls at cosine 0.60, correctly ranked. So the cold-session recall failure is Worldtree's recall-assembly/injection, NOT our search. ALSO found a latent UPSTREAM bug: a recall QUESTION got promoted as a durable chunk and ranked #1. **This is exactly #17's thesis — ratatoskr-as-provider caught an upstream bug invisible from the chat side.**