vh 02f2a04b37 feat(sse_client): implement issue #1 contract via TDD
Implements docs/contracts/issues/1.contract.md. Four entry points
(stream_turn, reconnect_turn, cancel_turn, _parse_sse_id) + nine
typed Event variants + ten domain exceptions. 37 tests covering
every TESTS: entry verbatim, plus the boundary smoke test still
passes.

Tracer-bullet ordering per the contract's per-FN tracer tags:
_parse_sse_id (foundation; happy_simple) → stream_turn
(happy_one_text_done) → reconnect_turn (happy_resume_from_seq_3) →
cancel_turn (happy_cancel). Each FN's tracer went RED then GREEN
before its other tests landed.

Shared SSE-iteration logic (INV-002 sse_id presence + INV-003
turn_id stability + terminal-break) lives in private _iter_events
helper. expected_turn_id=None gives stream_turn's "establish from
first event" semantics; expected_turn_id=N gives reconnect_turn's
"first event is already a flip-candidate" semantics — the
two-entry-point distinction Volva surfaced during the paraphrase
round.

A few implementation choices worth recording:

- _parse_sse_id uses a `^-?\\d+$` regex pre-check to reject any
  whitespace before int() is called. Python's `int(" 3 ")` silently
  strips, which would have made the trailing_whitespace adversarial
  test pass for the wrong reason.

- The connection_drop test uses a custom httpx.AsyncByteStream
  subclass (_DropAfter) that yields chunks then raises
  RemoteProtocolError mid-stream. respx alone can't simulate
  mid-stream HTTP errors.

- ToolResult.result and ToolStart.arguments are typed as Any
  because the server's tool wire shape varies per tool; the spec
  doesn't pin a generic schema.

- Boundary smoke test (no core.* / worldtree.* imports under
  src/ratatoskr/) still GREEN — INV-005 holds.

Also: one E501 line-length fix in test_no_worldtree_imports.py
that ruff flagged once the new tests pulled it into scope.
2026-05-20 21:25:20 -07:00

Ratatoskr

A Worldtree Conversation API debug TUI. Runs up and down Worldtree's API surface — sessions, turns, persona, tools, admin events, Bifrost state — carrying messages between layers. Like the squirrel.

The product is the observability surface; chat is the input mechanism. Devs run Ratatoskr against a local Worldtree to watch a turn flow through every layer of the system, side-by-side, in one terminal.

Status

v0 scaffold. Design locked; implementation hasn't started. The dev team owns the implementation pass.

Read in this order

  1. docs/design-brief.md — the locked design. Read this first. Every architectural decision is recorded with its rationale, the alternatives considered, and (where relevant) the operator's lock-in moment.
  2. docs/SPEC-PIN.md — what Worldtree spec version Ratatoskr is built against, where the vendored snapshot lives, and how to bump the pin.
  3. docs/conversation-api-spec.md — the vendored Worldtree spec snapshot. Read this to understand the API surface Ratatoskr consumes. Do not import anything from a Worldtree checkout — the boundary is the spec, not the code. See docs/design-brief.md §2.
  4. CLAUDE.md — Claude Code conventions for this repo (mostly inherited from the Corviduo template).
  5. persistent-memory.md — durable intent across context resets. Update as decisions and state evolve.

Quickstart

# 1. Environment
uv venv && source .venv/bin/activate
uv pip install -e ".[dev]"

# 2. Verify the spec pin
cat docs/SPEC-PIN.md   # documented Worldtree SHA + bump procedure

# 3. Tests (none yet; scaffold only)
uv run pytest

# 4. Run against a local Worldtree (once implementation lands)
# Worldtree must be running:  python -m core.conversation_api
ratatoskr --agent mimir

What this repo is NOT

  • NOT a polished consumer for Worldtree's end-users — that's the web app.
  • NOT a Worldtree admin tool — admin CLI is separate (sessions_cli.py lives in Worldtree).
  • NOT a featuretracking shadow of the web app — when the Conversation API surface grows, Ratatoskr does not necessarily grow with it.
  • NOT a remote-Worldtree debug client — file-tail surfaces (persona log, server log) assume local-dev posture.

The full negative-clause list lives in docs/design-brief.md §6.

Boundary rule

Ratatoskr depends on three things only:

  • httpx + httpx-sse (network layer)
  • textual (TUI framework)
  • Worldtree's published Conversation API spec at the pinned SHA

Hard rule: no imports from a Worldtree checkout. No core.* imports, no from worldtree.*, no shared models, no submodule of Worldtree. The spec is the entire surface. Boundary smoke test at tests/test_no_worldtree_imports.py enforces this in CI.

Version-skew strategy

The dev team is decoupled from Worldtree's dev team. To detect drift when Worldtree changes the API:

  1. Spec-version pin in pyproject.toml (worldtree-spec-rev). Bump explicitly; bumps are a tracked action.
  2. Recorded-SSE snapshot tests at tests/snapshots/. Captured against a live Worldtree; replayed in CI. Re-record after every pin bump.
  3. Conformance smoke test — boots Worldtree via Docker compose in CI, runs a one-turn happy path. Catches integration-level drift.

See docs/SPEC-PIN.md for the bump procedure.

Consumer-side discoveries

If you find a spec gap, ambiguity, or missing-but-needed endpoint while working on Ratatoskr: route the discovery back to worldtree-dev via althing rather than via PR on Worldtree directly. The separate-team boundary is intentional and helps catch spec gaps that an in-tree consumer would paper over.

  • Worldtree — the API Ratatoskr consumes
  • brokkr-smithy — authored this design brief
  • Skaldsong — another Worldtree API consumer (Python; render-and-aggregate pattern)
  • mead-hall — another Worldtree API consumer (TypeScript; server-side broker)
S
Description
No description provided
Readme 20 MiB
Languages
Python 82%
HTML 17.6%
Shell 0.4%