vh
ff1f9ca1e8
- #368 (user,character) memory silo test DONE + PASSED live (WT b127): write-side conjunctive {end_user,agent_self} scoping + read-side cross- character isolation both proven end-to-end; betty (throwaway) deleted, Sindra intact. Full record in persistent-memory.d/2026-07-18-368-silo- test-passed.md. Retired the stale "silo test in progress" in-flight blocks. - Two-tier migration: split 152 over-threshold dated entries into persistent-memory.d/ detail files, leaving one-line pointers in the index (startup load ~196KB -> ~53KB; bodies now load on demand). - Tier-3 stores scrubbed clean (memory 0 / affect 0, provider restarted empty); persistent-memory + detail file updated to reflect the scrub.
2 lines
676 B
Markdown
2 lines
676 B
Markdown
`[2026-06-19]` **The SAME `check_same_thread` sqlite bug recurred in the MEMORY store — exposed by the contract-mandated `search` dispatch test (TestClient = worker thread).** Heid's test-fidelity finding (the D1 dispatch test used `describe_store` where the contract says `search`) → fixing it to `search` tripped `sqlite3.ProgrammingError` because `open_memory_store` also lacked `check_same_thread=False`. Fixed (mirrors affect INV-006). **Lesson: this bug is PER-STORE — every sqlite-backed ASGI store needs `check_same_thread=False`; an HTTP-layer (TestClient) test exposes what direct-store tests can't, and the composite serving memory over HTTP makes it bite.**
|