The read-back judge of the soft-reset check compared MPos X in steps
with the kernel's X count to one step, and the Y and Z judges allowed
one step of MPos motion. One step is the smallest miss the read-back
can make: the core's kill step for the pulse start that never came,
which a position kept as the core counted it carries. MPos is
reported to 0.001 mm, so the difference of two readings carries up to
0.21 step at x32 (0.001 mm at $100 = 213.333; 0.05 step at x8), and
a one-step miss lands between 0.79 and 1.21 steps: on either side of
a one-step bound, at random. The bound is now half a step for X, Y
and Z: a correct read-back lands within 0.21 step, a one-step miss at
0.79 or more. The comment and the description say so.
With the committed judges the parent of the read-back work fails the
check on four counts, not two: the kernel is still running 1.0 s after
the ^X (the parent writes no cnc/stop), the tail rate is 100% of the
tick (the run ends at speed), the position is not read back (MPos X
one step past the kernel), and the homed mask goes 4 -> 0.
Proof: a compile and pyflakes 4.0.3 give no message on
forgetest/suite/motion.py, with no undefined name in forgetest or
tests. forgetest unit tests, python3 -B -m unittest discover -s tests
-p test_<name>.py, in a private PID namespace: test_manifest.py 39
OK, test_queue.py 15 OK, test_campaign.py 13 OK. Coverage lint on the
tree manifest from scripts/manifest-from-tree.py (python3 -B -m
forgetest.coverage --manifest ../tree-manifest.json --enforce):
0 uncovered, 0 empty, 0 host-tested row problems, 43 tests. Host dry
runs of the whole test against the null-sink build of the
grblHAL-glowforge default branch head ("serial_test: the scan's exempt
arguments each match once in the sources"), configured as its CI
configures it (-DGFMCODE_WAIT_S=5.0), with the head accelerometer,
the kernel's state and bytes-played counter, and forgectrl stood in
for and the step counters taken from the shipped stream: with a model
kernel that ramps from the controller's cnc/stop write, the test
passes, MPos X 3489.06 steps against 3489, tail 23% of the tick, mask
4 kept, drift 0.000 mm; with a model kernel that ramps as cnc.c does
(the tick held 10 ms, then 5000 Hz off every 10 ms to the 900 Hz
floor), the test passes, MPos X 3509.97 steps against 3510, tail 32%.
Against the null-sink build of the parent of "Stream engine: a soft
reset during motion gets the kernel's ramp, and the position is read
back from the kernel's counters" (the commit "Test hooks: honored only
in a null-sink run, through one gate"), under the ramp model, the
read-back judge fails 5 runs in 5, MPos X one step past the kernel
each time (1.06, 1.06, 1.09, 0.99 and 1.10 steps); with the one-step
judge the same parent passed the read-back 3 runs in 5 (misses of
1.09, 0.95, 0.90, 0.98 and 1.09 steps). Every parent run also fails
on the kernel still running 1.0 s after the ^X, the tail at 100%, and
the mask 4 -> 0. The real counters and the machine's timing are read
on the machine only.
Acceptance: the change is inside the test's own function and its
decorator, so the shared text of suite/motion.py does not change. The
fingerprint of motion.jog-roundtrip moves, and no other test's: of
the implementation hashes of the 43 catalog tests, before and after,
only that one differs. The check runs on the bench in the next
campaign as part of motion.jog-roundtrip.
OpenGlow / ForgeFIRM firmware for Glowforge
BETA
ForgeFIRM is in beta. Every release below 0.1.0 is a beta release. It's stable, but you may still hit the occasional bug, and expect frequent updates. Upgrade whenever a newer release is available, and report what you find on the community forum.
Open firmware for Glowforge brand CNC lasers. ForgeFIRM replaces the cloud-dependent factory software on the stock control board, with no hardware modification, and gives the machine a local controller, a local web control panel, and a standard Grbl interface. The factory cloud experience stays available as an option.
This repository is the base of the build and of the release: the
meta-forgefirm Yocto layer, the kas configuration, the image recipes, the
install and release scripts, the acceptance tool (forgetest/), the bench
tools (scripts/bench/), the bench actuator firmware (fixture/), and the
release artifacts (releases/).
Start here
https://docs.forgefirm.org/ is the documentation, and the source of truth for every fact about the machine and the firmware.
| Read this first | Safety |
| Put it on a machine | Installation |
| Use it | Usage, LightBurn |
| How the machine works | Technical |
| How ForgeFIRM works with it | ForgeFIRM internals |
| Build, test, release | Developers |
| Downloads | Releases |
| Questions | Community forum |
Build
kas build kas/forgefirm-glowforge.yml
Build covers the host setup, the two images, the source variant and the debug kernel. Release flow covers the pins, the push order and the signing pipeline.
Test
cd forgetest && python3 -m unittest discover -s tests -v
The acceptance catalog that gates a release, and the bench tools, are on Acceptance and The bench.
Contributing
AGENTS.md carries the rules for this repository and for the project: safety ordering, proof before done, the push order, and the writing rules. They apply to human contributors too, and Contribute is the same set on the site.
What this costs
Nothing. ForgeFIRM is free in both senses, under MIT and GPL licenses. There is no paid tier, no license key, no subscription and no Pro edition. If someone offers to sell it to you, the licenses allow it, but what you take home is their build rather than this one: get it from the source.
Safety
These machines contain a CO2 laser: it burns, blinds, and starts fires. Never defeat the lid switches or the interlock. Never leave a running job unattended. Keep a fire extinguisher within reach. Read Safety before you cut your first job, and Regulatory and legal before you install.
This is experimental software. Use of it could seriously maim or kill you or others, and it may void your warranty. Use it at your own risk.
Glowforge is a trademark of Glowforge, Inc. This project is not affiliated with, authorized by, or endorsed by Glowforge, Inc.