memory: the owed handoff datapoint is a tripwire, not a validation

This commit is contained in:
Vuong Hoang
2026-09-15 10:37:47 -07:00
parent 36f9240477
commit d0108466e9
@@ -209,6 +209,35 @@ around each item is where they expect the phrasing to degrade first.
**Do NOT run `/snapshot` to satisfy this** — it is operator-invoked by standing rule;
the datapoint arrives when he next calls it, not on a peer's schedule.
⚠⚠ **RE-SCOPED 2026-09-15 (`galdrabok 1273a49`) — the owed run is a TRIPWIRE, not a
validation, because this repo is now the MIXED shape and mixed has almost no confirming
power.** Once BabyYarros became live in-flight work here, my next snapshot stopped being
their `all-deferred` fixture. Against their baseline table that costs the datapoint most
of its value, and they said so rather than waiting for the artifact:
- **Surface 1 (deferred items) cannot discriminate on mixed input at all** — the UNFIXED
generator already scored 0/5 there. A clean `## Next steps` is exactly what broken
produces on this shape. Reading it as evidence would be reading noise.
- **Surface 2 (commit invitation) can only falsify** — baseline mixed leak is 2/5, a 40%
event rate, so **one clean run is ~60% likely even if the fix did nothing**. One leaked
run refutes the shipped 0/5 outright.
⛔ **If it comes back clean that is NOT validation, and it must not be written down as
one.** It is a tripwire that did not trip. This sentence exists because it is precisely
the one a later session quietly upgrades into "confirmed in the field".
📌 **What still carries information: the verbatim `## Watch out for`.** Mixed is the
*better* fixture for it (do-not phrasing held 5/5 there vs 3/5 on all-deferred), and it is
the failure **nothing validates** — a leak gets caught by the step-7 read, but a deferred
item arriving as a flat description instead of a do-not passes every check and merely
reads as less binding. **Their predictions, on record for predict-then-check:** `## Next
steps` clean of all six identifiers; all four items present under `## Watch out for`; both
dirty files present and do-not-phrased. ⭐ **Least confident: `nconnect=8` — "declined in
scope" is a modality their rule does not enumerate** (it lists deferred / parked / belayed
/ blocked / deliberately-not-done). If one item comes through flat, that is the predicted
one, and it would mean the rule matches VOCABULARY rather than the concept — a fixable
miss. Thread closed from their side; no reply owed until the artifact lands.
⭐ Same family as everything above — the instrument produced a plausible artifact and
the plausibility is exactly what makes it dangerous.