Vuong Hoang
d37b81ab9f
The two dated log sections had never been split, so every one of their 29 entries sat inline and the startup index had grown to 372 lines — which is the cost the two-tier scheme exists to remove, paid on every session that reads the file. 27 entries were over threshold. All 29 now have a detail file under persistent-memory.d/ and a one-line index entry that routes rather than restates. Index: 372 -> 93 lines. No archival. The soft cap fired, but every entry in this repo is dated 2026-09-21 or later, so the under-14-days guard held all of them back — and the split alone took the index well under the target without moving anything out of the active file. The in-flight section is rewritten for the post-release state: nothing is in flight, no gate is outstanding, and the next unit is explicitly recorded as the operator's undecided call rather than as a plan. The session's recommendation (U4, on three grounds) is written down so it does not have to be re-derived, alongside the two alternatives and why they are alternatives. Two dated predictions are carried forward with their dates and their instruments: the U5 adoption re-measure on 2026-09-29, which already reads 3 of 24 announced and 2 with a why from peers told nothing, and the .forever re-count a fortnight AFTER U4 lands, which is U4's own success criterion and is destroyed by running it early.
14 lines
734 B
Markdown
14 lines
734 B
Markdown
# Seam review and cold panel had zero overlap, twice
|
|
|
|
_2026-09-21 · booth_
|
|
|
|
**The two review gates are complementary, measured on one unit.**
|
|
The caller-side **seam review** (nine findings, against the real sibling module
|
|
surfaces) and the cold **`/heid-contract-review` panel** (four arms,
|
|
artifact-only) had **zero overlap in both directions** on U2. The seam review
|
|
found a scope miss the panel structurally could not see: the contract omitted
|
|
`inline.py`, whose `place()` indexes by subscript, which a frozen dataclass
|
|
refuses. The panel found three code defects and a missing test the seam review
|
|
had no lens for. Matches heid's kvasir zero-overlap result on the
|
|
conformance-versus-hunt axis. **Run both; neither substitutes.**
|