Files
booth/persistent-memory.d/2026-09-21-ambiguity-pass-did-the-work.md
T
Vuong Hoang d37b81ab9f memory: snapshot — U5 released at v0.3.0, and the index goes two-tier
The two dated log sections had never been split, so every one of their 29
entries sat inline and the startup index had grown to 372 lines — which is
the cost the two-tier scheme exists to remove, paid on every session that
reads the file. 27 entries were over threshold. All 29 now have a detail
file under persistent-memory.d/ and a one-line index entry that routes
rather than restates. Index: 372 -> 93 lines.

No archival. The soft cap fired, but every entry in this repo is dated
2026-09-21 or later, so the under-14-days guard held all of them back — and
the split alone took the index well under the target without moving
anything out of the active file.

The in-flight section is rewritten for the post-release state: nothing is
in flight, no gate is outstanding, and the next unit is explicitly recorded
as the operator's undecided call rather than as a plan. The session's
recommendation (U4, on three grounds) is written down so it does not have
to be re-derived, alongside the two alternatives and why they are
alternatives.

Two dated predictions are carried forward with their dates and their
instruments: the U5 adoption re-measure on 2026-09-29, which already reads
3 of 24 announced and 2 with a why from peers told nothing, and the
.forever re-count a fortnight AFTER U4 lands, which is U4's own success
criterion and is destroyed by running it early.
2026-09-22 08:20:51 -07:00

12 lines
627 B
Markdown

# Every code-changing finding came from the AMBIGUITY pass
_2026-09-21 · booth_
**Every one of the panel's code-changing findings came from the
AMBIGUITY pass, none from a paraphrase divergence** — and two arms independently
proposed cutting the paraphrase to a drift-check for narrative-heavy contracts,
because this contract's own frontmatter carries a plain-language narrative and the
paraphrase was partly reading my framing back to me. That is a finding about the
`/heid-contract-review` **skill**, not about this repo, and it was reported back
to heid. Recorded here only so a future session does not rediscover it.