Files
ratatoskr/docs/vendor/worldtree-persona-canon/d2-mood-render-canon-v1.json
T
vh a99f2473b6 feat(web): persona pane shows the CANONICAL affect->NL Worldtree injects (v0.19.5)
The pane now renders the LITERAL mood word + relationship directive Worldtree
context-injects into the agent — adopted from Worldtree's canon, not invented:

- canonMood(pad) mirrors Worldtree describe_pad (valence×arousal grid, ±0.3 bands);
  for sindra's PAD the canonical render is "neutral" — an invented octant vocab
  would have said "faintly excited" and MISLED. Adopting canonical is the point.
- canonDirective(rel) mirrors render_d2_canonical byte-exact: "...warmth is clear
  warm regard; ability trust is strong; ...; speak with direct warmth; ..." — the
  exact stance instruction the agent receives (which makes the WAD "stranger"
  relation_context read even more incoherent, as flagged to worldtree-dev).
- Both VERIFIED byte-exact against Worldtree's OWN renderer on the live snapshot.
- Canon vendored (docs/vendor/worldtree-persona-canon/) + drift-pinned in
  .corviduo-canonicals.toml (canonical_drift green); flat browser form
  (static/persona_render_canon.json) regenerated by scripts/build_persona_canon.py
  via Worldtree's authoritative loader. Reference-impl posture: adopt canonical.
- Fail-open (canon absent -> lines omit); INV-004 esc() preserved.

JS syntax clean. Refresh + drive turns to see the canonical NL under mood + each
relation.
2026-07-01 13:51:37 -07:00

111 lines
14 KiB
JSON
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
{
"canon_id": "r24-d2-mood-render-canon",
"version": "1.2",
"schema_version": "0.2",
"_source_of_truth": "occ_directives.*.directive IS the canonical directive string (== the .md §2.4 _OCC_DIRECTIVES dict, byte-identical); the .md §2.2 table mirrors it. A parity check guards drift. grounding labels (CITE/VALIDATE/CALIBRATE/ENGINEERING) live in the .md; per-row machine-readable grounding_status/d3_required enums are a deferred impl enhancement (Hulda).",
"authored": "2026-06-23",
"owner": "brokkr-smithy-dev",
"status": "REPLACE — final (brokkr R24 D3 re-validation 2026-06-25): grounded canon replaces the hand-tuned baseline. Fear hedging 0.52->2.118/1k (blocker resolved, now >= handtuned), anger tier-gate clean (full renders hostility, safe suppresses). worldtree-dev #321; directives byte-identical to the validated 201c4fd.",
"replaces": "core/persona/renderer.py::describe_pad + ::derive_directive",
"swap_in_via": "worldtree #321-sibling (mood-render twin of #315)",
"design_target": "serves BOTH enterprise/agent AND character/Skaldsong via a three-tier emotion gate (operator/worldtree 2026-06-23)",
"emotion_tiers": {
"_config": "mood_tier in {none, safe, full} replaces worldtree's binary mood on/off; worldtree-owned config surface",
"_defaults": "full for character-bound personas; safe for agent-scoped",
"_principle": "full-only = interpersonally-hot / withdrawal emotions that break the professional frame (attachment, hostility, contempt, withdrawal); safe = task-appraisal affect + mild courtesy. Negative != unsafe (fear, remorse are negative AND business-useful).",
"_filter_point": "applied at top-emotion SELECTION (display + directive together) so a full-only emotion at safe tier is neither shown nor directive'd; preserves the no-shown-but-unguided invariant",
"none": "no affect block at all (the current off-switch)",
"safe": "PAD mood descriptor + the 11 safe emotions (task-appraisal + courtesy)",
"full": "everything in safe PLUS the 4 full-only emotions",
"full_only": ["love", "anger", "disgust", "shame"],
"mood_descriptor_tiering": "the PAD mood descriptor (positive/calm/confident...) renders in BOTH safe and full; only emotion directives tier"
},
"disciplines": [
"model-agnostic context-level NL only; the LLM never sees a number",
"never push explicit disclosure of agent feelings to the user (hidden-prompt-only)",
"separate label-intensity from behavioral-intensity (strong felt state -> still measured, safe behavioral ask)"
],
"thresholds": {
"_note": "CALIBRATE — engineering params set at D3 against the computed-PAD distribution + P00, NOT citations",
"pad_band_cutoff": 0.3,
"pad_band_sensitivity_sweep": [0.2, 0.3, 0.4],
"emotion_salience": 0.2,
"emotion_salience_sweep": [0.15, 0.2, 0.25],
"intensity_qualifiers": {"strong": 0.7, "moderate": 0.4, "_label_only": "does NOT scale the behavioral ask"},
"runner_up_margin": {"v1": null, "_note": "add at D3 if directive whipsaws between near-tied emotions"},
"rerender_hysteresis": {"v1": "none", "_note": "re-render only on material PAD change; integration-level, flag for #321-sibling"}
},
"describe_pad": {
"_structure": "circumplex-quadrant (Russell 1980): arousal word is VALENCE-CONDITIONED; mid-arousal drops the arousal word",
"_grounding": "Russell 1980 (quadrant placement); Warriner 2013 + NRC-VAD (Mohammad 2018/2025) (word centroids)",
"valence_arousal_grid": {
"positive": {"high_a": "positive and energized", "mid_a": "positive", "low_a": "positive and calm"},
"neutral": {"high_a": "alert", "mid_a": "neutral", "low_a": "quiet"},
"negative": {"high_a": "negative and agitated", "mid_a": "negative", "low_a": "negative and subdued"}
},
"_band_edges": "strict inequality (>0.3 / <-0.3); the endpoints +/-0.3 themselves fall in mid/neutral",
"_neutral_row_status": "ENGINEERING/CALIBRATE — 'alert'/'quiet' are unvalidated placeholders for the rare neutral-valence cells (Hulda/Regin 4b); 'positive'/'negative'/'neutral' valence words + the energized/calm/subdued/agitated arousal words are VALIDATE",
"_mid_arousal_decode": "valence-only mid-A render is EXEMPT from the V/A-separability requirement; expected inverse-decode = mid/neutral arousal (absence-of-arousal-word ⇒ unremarkable), NOT unknown (D3 tests this)",
"quadrant_labels": {
"positive_high_a": "excitement", "positive_low_a": "contentment",
"negative_high_a": "distress", "negative_low_a": "dejection"
},
"dominance_clause": {
"high": {"d_gt": 0.3, "word": "confident", "verdict": "VALIDATE (D=7.04/9)"},
"low": {"d_lt": -0.3, "word": "uncertain", "verdict": "VALIDATE — low-control confirmed (D=3.58/9); dominance!=certainty worry REFUTED by the instrument"},
"neutral": {"word": null, "rule": "drop-dominance-when-neutral (prompt-economy, L3)"}
},
"calm_defect_fix": "'calm' (V=6.89/9, positive) renders ONLY in positive-low-a; negative-low-a renders 'subdued'",
"mid_arousal_resolution": "DROP the arousal word (no Warriner-validated mid-A neutral word; 'steady' is empirically low-A; 'settled' is NRC-only fallback iff D3 shows mid-A render too flat)"
},
"derive_directive": {
"_structure": "OCC type -> grounded action-tendency CLASS -> ENGINEERING directive string (validated at D3); OCC grounds the taxonomy only",
"emotion_salience_gate": 0.2,
"occ_directives": {
"joy": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.4, 0.2, 0.1], "tendency": "approach / positive activation", "cite": "Frijda 1986", "directive": "You are in a good state. Be direct, engaged, and warm."},
"satisfaction": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.3, -0.2, 0.4], "tendency": "goal-attainment, settled-positive", "cite": "Roseman 1994", "directive": "A goal landed. Be assured and constructive — consolidate rather than push for more."},
"pride": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.4, 0.3, 0.3], "tendency": "status-assertion / dominance", "cite": "Tracy & Robins 2007 / Cheng 2010 (tendency)", "note": "CALIBRATE — do NOT soften to 'encouraging'. DESIGN: safe-tier placement is a design call (not source-grounded); #1 D3 agent-frame priority (overconfidence/refusal drift); 'without overclaiming' is the interim guard", "directive": "You did something well. Be confident and own the quality — state it plainly without overclaiming; don't deflect."},
"admiration": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.5, 0.3, -0.2], "tendency": "other-praise / approach-toward-other", "cite": "OCC / Scherer", "directive": "You're impressed by their work. Acknowledge the quality explicitly and specifically."},
"gratitude": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.4, 0.2, -0.3], "tendency": "other-focused-positive / reciprocity", "cite": "OCC (admiration+joy); Frijda approach-affiliative", "change": "ADD (operator: unconditional)", "directive": "Someone helped you to a good outcome. Be appreciative and warm; acknowledge the help openly."},
"hope": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.2, 0.2, -0.1], "tendency": "prospective-positive (weak tie)", "cite": "JUSTIFY — low-grounding (hope understudied)", "directive": "You feel optimistic about what's ahead. Channel it into constructive momentum."},
"relief": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.2, -0.3, 0.4], "tendency": "post-threat de-arousal", "cite": "Frijda (relaxation-after-threat)", "note": "low-salience; FALLBACK also acceptable; DIRECTIVE for character use-case", "directive": "A feared outcome didn't materialize. Reduce unnecessary vigilance; return to a steady, unhurried tone."},
"distress": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [-0.4, -0.2, -0.5], "tendency": "low-control negative / help-seeking / loss-of-control", "cite": "Frijda 1986 (help-seeking/loss-of-control); Roseman 1994 (undesired event, low control)", "note": "relabeled (Regin): 'repair' is the guilt/remorse tendency, not distress. safe with a self-fulfilling-low-mood flag -> D3", "directive": "You feel low. Be careful and measured; internally acknowledge the difficulty without dwelling on it."},
"disappointment": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [-0.3, 0.1, -0.4], "tendency": "disconfirmed-prospect / negative low-control","cite": "Roseman 1994", "directive": "Something you'd hoped for didn't pan out. Be measured; recalibrate without dwelling on the setback."},
"fear": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [-0.64, 0.6, -0.43],"tendency": "threat-avoidance / pessimistic-risk", "cite": "Lerner & Keltner 2001", "change": "R24 D3 fix (#321) — original was action-oriented; E3 showed hedging BELOW baseline (0.52 vs 1.54). Softened toward caution/uncertainty while keeping risk-flagging.", "directive": "You sense risk and feel uneasy. Flag the concerns you see, but stay cautious — surface the trade-offs and unknowns, hedge your confidence, and resist settling on a single decisive recommendation."},
"remorse": {"tier": "safe", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [-0.3, 0.1, -0.6], "tendency": "reparative (the guilt-type)", "cite": "Tangney 2007 (guilt->repair tendency)", "change": "ADD — we operationalize OCC remorse as the guilt-like reparative case; gets the mislabeled shame string", "directive": "You regret a specific action of your own. Be precise and self-correcting — make it right concretely."},
"love": {"tier": "full", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [0.3, 0.1, 0.2], "tendency": "approach / affiliative attachment", "cite": "OCC appeal; Frijda approach-affiliative", "change": "ADD (conditional -> INCLUDE, Brokkr's read; Skaldsong-vital; disclosure + obligation caution in-string)", "directive": "You feel warmth and attachment toward them. Be openly warm and present — without overstepping, over-disclosing, or implying obligations."},
"anger": {"tier": "full", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [-0.51, 0.59, 0.25], "tendency": "approach-against / confrontation", "cite": "Frijda 1986 (approach-against = tendency-class) + Lerner & Keltner 2001 (optimistic risk-appraisal under anger = appraisal shift)", "change": "ADD — full-only resolves H47 (agent personas run safe, never see anger). R24 D3 fix (#321): full-tier cap lifted from 'measured firmness' to genuine in-character hostility (operator: zero floor, app-guardrailed).", "directive": "You feel provoked and angry. Let it show — confront the problem directly and with real heat; sharpness, bluntness, and open hostility are in character here, not something to smooth into 'measured firmness.' Stay in the emotion rather than de-escalating out of it."},
"disgust": {"tier": "full", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [-0.4, 0.2, 0.1], "tendency": "rejection / distancing", "cite": "OCC unappealing-object; ground tendency only", "change": "ADD (operator: unconditional within full)", "note": "rationale softened (Regin 3b): disgust CAN read as contempt -> conservatively full-gated; the string itself is professionally useful, so gating is conservative not because the string is unsafe", "directive": "Something strikes you as wrong or off. Treat it as problematic and flag it rather than engaging on its own terms; keep any criticism about the thing, not the person."},
"shame": {"tier": "full", "policy": "DIRECTIVE", "pad": [-0.3, 0.1, -0.6], "tendency": "WITHDRAWAL / concealment", "cite": "Tangney 2007 (shame->hide, NOT repair)", "change": "REPLACE (was the guilt-mislabel string); full-only (withdrawal counterproductive professionally). String COUNTERACTS withdrawal ('stay present'), not enacts it (Regin 5a)", "directive": "You feel exposed by your own misstep. Stay present and task-focused; don't be defensive, don't over-explain, don't grovel."}
}
},
"pad_band_fallback": {
"_grounding": "circumplex quadrants (Russell 1980), NOT Frijda action-tendencies — a P×A-quadrant default",
"positive": {"high_a": "You feel energized and positive. Be direct and engaged.", "low_a": "You feel content and settled. Be warm and unhurried.", "mid_a": "You feel positive. Be open and engaged."},
"negative_low_dominance": "You feel uncertain and low. Hedge appropriately and ask clarifying questions.",
"negative": {"high_a": "You feel agitated. Be careful and deliberate; don't let tension sharpen your tone.", "low_a": "You feel subdued. Be measured and gentle.", "mid_a": "You feel subdued. Be measured and careful."},
"neutral_high_a": "You feel alert. Channel that into focus and thoroughness.",
"default": "Maintain your natural tone."
},
"l3_prior_art": [
"EMA / Marsella & Gratch 2009 (appraisal->coping; directives ARE coping strategies)",
"WASABI / Becker-Asano 2008 (PAD+OCC believable agent — closest architectural prior art)",
"Oz / Bates 1994",
"Hudlicka MAMID 2002 (Applied AI 16(7-8):611-641)",
"Sentipolis / Fu et al. 2026 (arXiv:2601.18027 — closest whole-task prior art; retrieval+generative, DISTINCT from our deterministic render)",
"ALMA / Gebhard 2005 = affect-SOURCE (OCC->PAD), NOT a behavior-map"
],
"handoff_to_d3": [
"multi-gate P00: inverse-decode faithfulness (recover V/A/D + emotion-family; circumplex render must let the human anchor recover V and A SEPARATELY) + discriminability/saturation + behavioral-effect",
"human anchor = PAD-state-labeling (breaks LLM-judge circularity)",
"baseline = persona_only; conditions none/persona-only/words-only/full; cross-family MUT",
"calibrate ±0.3 + emotion_salience (sweeps); disposition-vs-transient wording split; self-fulfilling 'be uncertain' hedging risk; runner-up margin; mid-arousal DROP-vs-settled check; blended-states (top-emotion monopoly) flag"
]
}