ratatoskr/persistent-memory.d/2026-06-14-artifact-only-contract-review-can-t-validate.md at 4bd9abdebc04ae4d2a3337213ca958620d2e551a

Files

T

vh ff1f9ca1e8 memory: /snapshot — #368 silo test passed; two-tier migration; stores scrubbed

- #368 (user,character) memory silo test DONE + PASSED live (WT b127):
  write-side conjunctive {end_user,agent_self} scoping + read-side cross-
  character isolation both proven end-to-end; betty (throwaway) deleted,
  Sindra intact. Full record in persistent-memory.d/2026-07-18-368-silo-
  test-passed.md. Retired the stale "silo test in progress" in-flight blocks.
- Two-tier migration: split 152 over-threshold dated entries into
  persistent-memory.d/ detail files, leaving one-line pointers in the index
  (startup load ~196KB -> ~53KB; bodies now load on demand).
- Tier-3 stores scrubbed clean (memory 0 / affect 0, provider restarted
  empty); persistent-memory + detail file updated to reflect the scrub.

2026-07-17 21:39:18 -07:00

545 B

Raw Blame History

[2026-06-14] Artifact-only contract review can't validate against a dependency's ACTUAL behavior. /heid-contract-review sees only the contract, never the external library (bifrost) — so "the consumer under-built against bifrost's real semantics" is invisible to it by construction (the affect idempotency model shipped wrong because of this). Real-lib TDD against the shipped library + the executable reference store + the #195 parity test are the gate. Don't treat a clean contract review as evidence the code matches the dependency.

545 B Raw Blame History

545 B

Raw Blame History