Deployed gap-injection run closed by operator steer 2026-07-04: R30 graduates on offline-tests + human face-validity, no deployed harness build, no endpoint. Harness (read/predict/record; write side stubbed) + brokkr's R30.10 protocol pin (de8357f) banked as drop-in for the parked powered true-tau perceptual study. predict() self-validated against brokkr's N=0 anchors (1h/10h/1wk).
3.1 KiB
R30 gap-injection — deployed-run harness (BANKED, not run)
Status: CLOSED — not executed. On 2026-07-04 the operator steered close R30 on
offline-tests + human face-validity, no deployed harness build, no endpoint. No
(agent, N, Δt, observed p/a/d) series was collected. This harness + brokkr's protocol
are banked / drop-in for the parked powered true-τ perceptual study if it is ever
commissioned.
Spec pin: brokkr R30.10 protocol de8357f —
brokkr-smithy/research/R30-ocean-derived-mood-dynamics/empirics/r30-gap-injection-protocol.md.
Why it was closed (not built)
The deployed gap-injection run was confirmatory, not measuring (brokkr's §0 reframe:
against a deployed system the fade is exp(−Δt/τ_shipped) by construction, so a fit
returns τ_shipped tautologically — the run graduates the interim coefficients, it does not
measure them). Given that:
- The repo's offline tests already cover the OU formula + BOTH directions
(
high_N_fades_slower_than_low_Ndecay,phenotype_high_n_bigger_negative_excursiongain). - b17 is deployed-clean on demo + personal.
- The ①-approved mood-holds-within-conversation IS the face-validity call.
…the interim coefficients graduate validated-as-shipped with no deployed run needed.
The build cost that would have been required (and was declined):
- No deployed write affordance exists; the in-memory
_user_moodscache shadows rawpersona_mood.dbwrites, so a clean inject needs an in-service set-mood/back-date endpoint (set p/a/d +updated_at+ evict cache). moody-lofn N=+0.8does not exist (only lofnN=−0.5; tier-3 empty OCEAN → N=0), so the gain half would have needed a new high-N tier-1 agent + deploy — dropped as the expensive, offline-redundant half.
What is validated (harness self-check)
harness.py::predict() reproduces brokkr's stated N=0 P-axis retention anchors exactly:
| Δt | predicted | brokkr stated |
|---|---|---|
| 1h (3600s) | 0.904837 | 0.905 |
| 10h/overnight (36000s) | 0.367879 | 0.368 |
| 1 week (604800s) | 5.06e-08 | 5e-08 |
Per-axis τ confirms arousal fades ~1.9× faster (N=0: τ_P = τ_D = 10h, τ_A = 5.26h).
Personal :8081 b17 baseline survey (candidate N-grid agents, all at rest)
| agent | baseline p/a/d | note |
|---|---|---|
| lofn | 0.809 / −0.153 / 0.248 | production, N=−0.5 |
| mask | 0.0 / 0.0 / 0.0 | zero baseline → zero-N candidate |
| forseti | 0.239 / −0.696 / 0.095 | production |
| mimir | 0.615 / −0.438 / 0.304 | production |
(sindra 404s — owner-scoped tier-3, expected.)
To un-bank (if the powered study is commissioned)
- Worldtree builds the in-service set-mood/back-date endpoint (set p/a/d +
updated_at- evict
_user_moods), or the read-only fade-preview variant if that satisfies D1.
- evict
- Wire
harness.py::freeze_start()+backdate()to that endpoint (near-zero rebuild). - Run the 3×8 grid (frozen start p=−0.6/a=+0.5/d=−0.3 × Δt grid), hand brokkr the
(agent, N, Δt, observed p/a/d)table + per-agentbaseline_pad(); he runs D1/D2/D3.