mirror of
https://github.com/openglow-org/forgefirm.git
synced 2026-10-19 02:51:42 -07:00
ScottW514
6a4ece4b0d
The focus burn's emission was judged from the burn's result alone: the daemon's own 25 Hz reads of cnc/laser_on_sampled and pic/hv_current, reported as laser_on_samples and hv_max. The one live catalog test of the wizard's burn took the daemon under test at its word for the emission it reported, where the laser.* tests judge from the test's own /status samples. run_check takes on_poll(doc), called once per poll of /wiz/dark with the status document, a caller's own witness read beside the check's; the default keeps every positional caller as it is. Witnesses, in setup_burns, reads the two attributes from sysfs at every poll and keeps each at its peak and the count of polls that read both. burn() passes it to run_check, and emission_ok(ctx, last, seen) keeps the result's three checks and adds the test's own: at least one poll read both witnesses, the LASER_ON count read nonzero from here, and the tube current read over HV_ON (30, the daemon's own rule for a lit burn, jobstream.h JOBSTREAM_HV_ON) from here. Once the result's three checks pass, the evidence carries the two peaks and the read count as emission_seen; the two readings are not compared with each other. The beam sensor's handling is unchanged, and the description names both readings. Proof: tests/test_setup_burns.py, the Unit tests step of forgetest-ci.yml (python -B -m unittest discover -s tests), 20 tests OK on Windows and on Linux, with tests/test_setup_dark.py (20 OK) for the positional callers of run_check. BurnRunTests plants cnc/laser_on_sampled and pic/hv_current under GF_SYSFS_ROOT (the shape of a bench record), the lit burn's evidence carries the two peaks with reads over zero, and a burn whose result reports a lit burn while the two attributes read 0 from here fails on the LASER_ON count, with the setting put back and the controller restarted on it. pyflakes reports no undefined name. Negative control on a scratch copy: with setup_burns.py and setup_dark.py as they were before this change, that same case passes (Failed not raised) and the evidence has no emission_seen; the two new assertions catch both. Acceptance: setup.focus's fingerprint moves (its own text, and the shared text of setup_burns.py and setup_dark.py), and every test of setup_dark.py moves through run_check: setup.check-switches, setup.check-airflow, setup.check-motion, setup.check-lens and setup.cloud-header-capture. motion.release does not move (its run_check import is inside the function body). The next campaign runs setup.focus with both readings on the bench.