mirror of
https://github.com/openglow-org/forgefirm.git
synced 2026-09-27 16:51:12 -07:00
ScottW514
619414ed2b
The cloud client turns a print away before the button wait for four reasons of its own (machine._safe_to_move): the lid or the interlock, a machine that is not idle, the coolant above its start ceiling (THERMAL.max_start_temp), a coolant sensor that reads nothing. It logs the reason and finishes the print ':cancelled' within a millisecond. The four tests that wait for the button looked only for the wait, so on the bench reference, with the loop at 27.4 C against the ceiling of 27, cloud.dark-print sat out its 120 s and said "the print never reached the button wait". wait_button_wait replaces the four waits: it ends on the print's finish line as well, and fails with the client's own lines, for example "the client turned the print away before the button wait: INFO machine:_safe_to_move machine temp is too high, temp: 27.4 (... finished with event ":cancelled")". The ceiling is the client's and stays where it is: the remedy for a warm loop is airflow, a run session for a minute or two. Proven. test_a_print_turned_away_before_the_button_fails_at_once_with_the_reason replays the bench reference's lines and fails in under 30 s with that reason; with the early exit disabled it fails after the full 120 s with the old words. Each reason is a line the pinned cloud library can log, so the phrase check passes. The unit suite passes (422) with no undefined name. On the bench reference, image 20260920211625 with this cloud.py over the image's, cloud.dark-print passes through the new wait with the loop at 25.8 C. Acceptance. cloud.dark-print, cloud.verdict-refuse, cloud.lid-during-button-wait, and every test that starts an offline print go through the new wait. The helper is module text, so every cloud.py test's fingerprint moves; no product behavior changes.