The release build merges kas/source-bundle.yml, which turns on the Yocto
archiver: the upstream source of each recipe as upstream publishes it, the
patches with their series file, and the recipe with its includes. The
overlay adds tasks only, so the image manifest is unchanged and an
acceptance result still applies; proven on the build host, where the
archiver build and a plain rebuild of the same tree give the same
content_sha256.
scripts/source-bundle.py packs forgefirm-source-v<version>.tar.gz: the
archives, both license manifests, the license texts, the ForgeFIRM layers,
the kas configuration, the layer revisions and the build identity of the
image. What the bundle must hold comes from the image, not from a list in
the script: every recipe of license.manifest and image_license.manifest
whose license is in the include list must have an archive, or the release
stops with the recipe named. release.sh attaches the bundle and covers it
with sha256sums.txt; FORGEFIRM_SOURCE_SKIP=1 bypasses deliberately.
On the build host: 68 of the image's 111 recipes carry source, 313.7 MiB,
under the 2 GiB limit of a release asset.
No acceptance catalog consequence: the change is release tooling on the
build host and puts no file and no behavior on the machine. The host-side
proof is forgetest/tests/test_source_bundle.py, which holds the license
decision, the choice of archive and the refusal.
B-16: the forgetest recipe fetches the package directory whole, and the
file fetcher's checksum is taken before do_unpack drops __pycache__, so a
host `__pycache__` written by running the tests moves the recipe's task
hash with no source change. The three python steps run with -B now;
`src-sync` to the build VM excludes the caches as well. A developer who
runs the tests locally without -B still creates them; there is no exclude
on the file fetcher, so this is the floor, not a cure (BRINGUP item 11).
laser.emission-witness required the hardware button latch clear in every
sample the engine reported armed, and, after a first fix, in every sample
up to the last nonzero emission count. Both windows were drawn from
lagging signals: the engine's armed flag follows the controller's next
report, and the emission counter latches once per second and reads
nonzero about two seconds past the relock. Both reached into the tail
where the job-end relock sets the button latch by design, and the rule
refused three clean runs on image 20260902144848 (all four sides
burned; the trail shows the latch clear from the press to the relock,
emission through the fourth side, HV_ENABLE's dip in the dwell and its
return).
The rule now uses the window the hardware defines: from the first
emission, in every sample whose readback word shows the laser latch
unlocked, the button-latch bit of that same word must be clear. That
spans the kernel-run gap of the dwell and ends at the relock, and no
lagging flag can misplace it. dwell_gap() is a pure function;
tests/test_laser_dwell.py holds the relocked tail, a set inside the gap,
and a trail without emission. The recorded trail of the third run
replays to a pass (47 unlocked samples, none set).
The live runs keep a per-sample trail in the evidence (TRAIL_FIELDS: the
readback word, the switches, the lock flag, the controller's state and
messages), so a run's timeline can be read back without a rerun.
A fourth run then errored on a name the refactor had removed and one
later check still used; py_compile does not catch it and a live drill
never executes on the host, so the CI job now fails on any undefined
name in the harness (pyflakes).
Catalog consequence: the laser implementation hashes move.
The recipe URLs, the release and install URLs, the vendor check and the CI checkouts name openglow-org, and the grblHAL core fork is openglow-org/grblHAL-core. No catalog change is owed: the recipe edits move the meta-forgefirm content hash, which every test fingerprint folds in through the platform block, so the whole catalog re-runs on its own.
The documentation site, docs.forgefirm.org, is the one home for the
developer documentation. BUILD.md, kas/README.md, and docs/ACCEPTANCE.md
are on the site under Developers, and they are deleted here. Every
reference points at the site: README.md, BRINGUP.md, UPDATE-SYSTEM.md,
the kas configuration comments, release.sh, the CI workflow comments, and
the releases, forgetest, and bench READMEs.
BRINGUP.md: "Next work" item 16, step timing under CPU contention, is
closed; the video work resolved it. The items after it are renumbered.
CAMPAIGN-LOG.md records the closure.
Documentation and comments only. No layer content changes, so the
manifest identity of the next image does not change. No catalog
consequence.
The acceptance page is assembled by page.py from forgetest/forgetest/ui/
(index.html, page.css, help.js, app.js) plus theme.css and the vendored
Bootstrap files, which are byte for byte the ones forgectrl's panel
carries, so the two pages look like one product and share the light and
dark themes (same localStorage key). A plain file is read in a checkout;
on the dev image the recipe installs ui/ gzipped and page.py reads the
.gz sibling, inflating once at first request: the rootfs is raw ext4, so
bytes in the package are bytes on the image. The explanatory prose
(campaign rules, the queues, the campaign actions, the prerequisites
switch, the bench intro) is a "?" popover with a link into the
documentation site; operator steps, prompts, notices and the live-laser
acknowledgment stay in the page, and confirmLive() stays a blocking
dialog. The page's own rules hold: rows, prompt buttons and tool entries
are built once and updated in place, and the popovers sit on static
markup only, so no rebuild orphans one. On a phone the Run pane goes to
the top for the duration of a run.
scripts/check-ui-vendor.py compares the shared files against forgectrl
at its pinned revision (or a local checkout with --forgectrl); it runs
in forgetest-ci.yml, so the copies cannot drift.
Tests: test_page.py (the gzipped install assembles to the same bytes as
a checkout, one self-contained response, the token placeholder once, a
missing marker refused); test_server asserts the served page's
invariants; test_responsiveness keeps its rules with needles pointed at
the new files, its ASCII rule applied to our own sources (Bootstrap's
CSS carries an em dash of its own), and its self-contained rule testing
asset tags rather than the presence of https:// (the documentation links
are meant to be there). forgectrl.panel-serves gains two needles for the
panel's theme attribute and save bar. Proof: the unit suite, and the
page in Chrome against a fake catalog (both themes, popovers, the bench
tab, a full operator run with its prompt, abort).
forgectrl pinned at 9d1f6f2 (the panel on Bootstrap, one save bar, help
popovers, themes, the gzipped page); PV unchanged. The pin moves only
forgectrl's fingerprint. The forgetest changes are the harness's own and
have no catalog consequence.
cloud.pause-resume failed a print that paused, resumed with its laser
lead, completed and parked: the test waited for the single line "button
pressed while paused; resuming", and the app has logged that as two
lines since its feeder work ("button pressed while paused", then
"resuming (laser lead N ticks)" from _resume_retraced). The replay
fixture carried the old wording, so the host test kept passing.
The pause and resume are now judged on PAUSE_LINES + RESUME_LINES
through one checker shared by the three tests that drive a pause
(cloud.pause-resume, the streamed pause, the pause-then-lid test), which
also fails on the app's "resume refused" line with the reason. The
fixture carries the app's two lines.
So the wording cannot drift silently again: tests/test_cloud_needles.py
reads every log phrase the cloud suite greps for out of cloud.py (the
left side of each `x in ln`, every wait_log needle, the mark tuples, and
the phrases it builds) and checks each against the logger calls in the
app sources at the revisions the recipes pin, read from the manifest
cache the tree manifest builds (the sibling checkouts locally),
placeholder-aware under a rule that never lets a placeholder stand for
the phrase itself. CI now builds the tree manifest before the unit
tests so the cache is there. The old needle fails that check.
Replays added: the second press seen but no retraced restart, and a
refused resume. 159 unit tests pass; coverage lint clean. No catalog
consequence beyond the suite module's own hash.
scripts/acceptance-gate.py recomputes every catalog test's domain fingerprint
from /etc/forgefirm-manifest.json inside the release rootfs and requires the
committed releases/v<version>/acceptance.json to carry a matching PASS
(inherited results not core and newer than the invalidate epoch; the artifact
self-hashed; the catalog identical to the tree). release.sh runs it after the
build and stages the artifact as a release asset; FORGEFIRM_ACCEPTANCE_SKIP=1
bypasses loudly. scripts/manifest-from-tree.py builds the same manifest from
the recipe pins with git for CI and the workstation; forgetest-ci.yml runs the
unit tests and enforces the coverage lint (every manifest path covered by some
test). docs/ACCEPTANCE.md is the contract; the coverage currency rule and the
status live in BRINGUP.
ScottW514