Commit Graph
230 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
ScottW514 7d982070c0 BRINGUP: the interlock loop is J8 (J6 is the speaker); the 3.3 V rail carries the fixture's coils 2026-08-23 14:35:36 -04:00
ScottW514 b54b94e8ae forgetest: the bench actuator plugs into the action seam
fixture.py: the bench's /data/forgetest/fixture.json (hostname, key,
optional ip, the channels wired, arm_press), a resolver for
<hostname>.local asked of the network directly (the image has no mDNS
resolver), and the client. The runner probes it before every run and
at most every 30 s otherwise; ctx.act asks it for a channel it covers
and still waits for the machine's own reading, falling back to the
operator's notice when the box fails. A test declares with hands=(...)
what it asks of a person beyond its typed actions; an operator test
with none, whose actions the fixture covers, is routed into the
unattended queue, its Ready gates pass, and a prompt it raises anyway
is a FAIL naming the undeclared step. Live tests never move; their arm
press stays a person's unless the bench opted in, in which case the
fixture presses when the button lights. Whatever the box still holds
after a run is released before the baseline's post pass and recorded.
The page shows what the fixture covers. Contract in ACCEPTANCE.md; the
wiring facts, with the interlock connector left to the bench to settle
(SAFETY.md and the sister map differ), in BRINGUP.

Catalog unchanged in its definitions; the cloud and laser suites'
shared code moved, so their implementation hashes move with it.
2026-08-23 14:15:53 -04:00
ScottW514 e5fa4445c0 BRINGUP: the service protocol proven by the emulator; CAMPAIGN-LOG 2026-08-23
Dev image 20260823161333, campaign c-20260823161923-0dd7, 44 of 44,
release authorized. The cloud split of the acceptance plan is complete:
the protocol by the emulator with only the app to drive, the machine's
print behavior by the offline service, the two together by one real
print, and the service's hunt paid only where it is the subject.
2026-08-23 12:38:41 -04:00
ScottW514 4c9dcca7e6 BRINGUP: the emulator test built into dev image 20260823002125, its full campaign owed 2026-08-22 20:37:41 -04:00
ScottW514 1c8197faa3 forgetest: cloud.service-protocol, the service answered by the emulator in this machine's identity
The service-protocol half of the cloud catalog on its own test: the cloud
client restarted as gfutilities' emulator under the /run/gfcloud-emulate
marker signs in, passes the firmware check, opens the WebSocket, answers
the connect-time hunt and the image requests with the dev image's canned
frames, and runs a print from the app through the real download path to
':completed' - nothing moves, nothing arms, and only the app has to be
driven, by a person or an agent through the prompt API. The real client
is restarted afterward and its hunt waited out. session_live now knows
the emulator's session is not the machine's, so enter_cloud restarts it
rather than reusing it; restart_client is the one restart the offline
and emulator entries share.

The dev image adds python3-gfutilities-emulator (the fixtures, packaged
on their own in meta-openglow); forgefirm-app moves to 12ad3b1 (gfcloud
--emulate). Catalog: 44 tests, 27 auto / 9 operator / 8 live; the new
test covers the gfutilities service layer and examples/, which step 4
will take off the other cloud tests. Replays over the prompt script;
contract and BRINGUP updated. A layer change (the dev image recipe):
everything re-requires on the next image.
2026-08-22 20:19:46 -04:00
ScottW514 0cb9044e1d forgetest: the offline jobs removed after each test; the record of the first offline campaign
Every offline test now removes the jobs it wrote under /tmp/forgetest
on its way out (the bench rule: nothing left behind in the session that
put it there). CAMPAIGN-LOG gets the 2026-08-22 entry for dev image
20260822232347: the offline service dry-checked, then campaign
c-20260822233344-08de, 13 run and 43 of 43 with the four offline tests in
5.5 minutes, and what the machine said under it. BRINGUP: the offline
service is done and bench-validated.
2026-08-22 19:59:36 -04:00
ScottW514 9cc2e4eef4 forgetest: the machine's print behavior under the offline service
Four cloud tests no longer need the app, an account, a network, or
anything on the bed: cloud.lid-interlock-abort, lid-during-button-wait,
paused-lid-cancel and oversize-stream run under the offline service
(enter_offline restarts the cloud client with the /run marker for that
one start; Offline is the socket; offline_job writes the job). The jobs
come from forgetest/puls.py: the header of a factory print of this
machine type (134 tags, MCsn 0, so the client's limits and settings come
from where a service job's do) over a square traced at a steady feed
with a leading power byte of zero and no LASER bit anywhere - the arm
unlocks the latch, the beam is never commanded, so the tests stay live
and need no scrap. A job longer than the ring (33 MiB of ticks, an hour
of squares) is an 87 kB gzip written in a tenth of a second, in place of
a full-bed raster designed in the app.

session_live reads the offline mark as "no web session"; enter_cloud
restarts an offline client with the service, so cloud.pause-resume (the
one real print left, with cloud.mode-switch the service-protocol half of
the catalog) follows the offline tests without the operator's hand.
Replays over a fake socket; the contract and BRINGUP say how the cloud
catalog splits. Catalog consequence: the four re-ported tests move;
nothing else is invalidated.
2026-08-22 19:19:50 -04:00
ScottW514 60db95634b docs: the first campaign with the operator's part cut down
CAMPAIGN-LOG: the 2026-08-22 entry for dev image 20260822204234 - the
three harness findings (the jog witness, the fading button LED, the
duplicated app cancel), the implementation-hash change they exposed,
and campaign c-20260822220701-a1c0: 43 of 43 from nothing, the 16
attended tests in 19 minutes, with what each new witness read on the
machine. BRINGUP: bench-validated, the latest campaign, the hash rule.
2026-08-22 18:48:09 -04:00
ScottW514 de324cc32f forgetest: the operator's part asked for by name, and fewer hands in a campaign
A campaign asked a person for about eighty things: lid, button and
interlock actions, app jobs, and sixteen confirmations by eye, most of
them as popups to read and answer while the head was already moving.
This is the forgetest-only step of cutting that down.

The operator channel. A test asks for its operator's part in four ways:
ctx.ready() pre-announces a timed step and waits for the click that
starts it; ctx.notice() is a standing instruction with no button, the
test watching the machine for the result; ctx.act(channel, state) is a
machine action by name (lid, interlock, button) - a notice for the
operator today, proven done by the switch reading or an `until`
condition, recorded in evidence.actions with who performed it, and the
seam a bench actuator plugs into through runner.fixture; ctx.confirm()
stays for the yes/no the evidence cannot answer. Tests declare
`actions`; a `precheck` refuses a start the machine cannot honor (a
reason, no result, a queue skips it and carries on).

The page shows what you will do before it is asked: the running test's
steps, a queue's attended tests still waiting, or the test whose title
you clicked while idle; notices and prompts sit under it. The campaign
card no longer carries baseline, queue and leftover notes: those go to
the runner journal (daemon.log, syslog as `forgetest`, and the run in
progress), with a Runner journal button in the footer.

The catalog, 43 tests (27 auto, 8 operator, 8 live; was 45: 25/12/8):
cloud.mode-switch absorbs cloud.hunt-lid-open and cloud.gfhome-homing
(the connect made with the lid open, the hunt judged lid-open with its
Z cycle, the re-hunt waited out after the close, the switch back, then
$H judged by gfhome's own "homing complete" line with its motion
windows; precheck homing_mode = gfcloud). kernel.fire-line is auto with
the HV-not-good precheck, camera.snapshot is auto (a second frame with
the lid lamp off differs and is smaller), motion.jog-roundtrip is auto
(the head accelerometer per leg, the supervisor's own witness). The
remaining attended tests use Ready gates and act(); the head's beam
detector and the button LEDs replace the eye, leaving two confirms: the
emission witness's mark and the app's display in cloud.pause-resume.

Proof: tests/test_operator.py (the channel, the precheck, the journal),
the cloud replays re-targeted to the merged round trip over a fake grbl
and the bench excerpts, 196 host tests green, coverage lint 0 uncovered.
Every re-ported attended test is owed one bench run on the next dev
image (BRINGUP). Catalog consequence: the merged and reclassified
tests' implementation hashes move; nothing else is invalidated.
2026-08-22 16:36:03 -04:00
ScottW514 4e0c90b5a5 The pulse-header envelope settled; the SoC die watched; item 19 closed
forgectrl pin b27398a: the SoC die joins the watched board temperatures
(/status temps soc_c and the kernel's CPU cooling state soc_throttle,
the Status tab, the per-job range line naming a throttle), a throttle
starting or ending is logged, and the supply sensor stays a raw count by
decision (its heatsink cannot be reached with a thermometer while the
machine runs). forgefirm-app pin e65cfc2 (0.1.16+git): every pulse-header
key without an applier is declared with its reason or counted as
undecided in the job log, and CLOUD.md carries one disposition table for
the whole header.

BRINGUP: the pulse-header envelope item is closed. Its durable content is
in the facts bank ("The factory's envelope, decoded": the mandatory tags,
the empty tach windows, the factory's pause and fail tiers, the
per-sensor units, the unarmed flow controller, and ForgeFIRM's answer
with its catalog proofs) and in the "Deliberately not gated" paragraph,
which names every declared family. Item 19 is now the bench-measured
head crash and rail-contact detector; the fire-watch item holds the
header's lid IR thresholds as its prior. The facts bank also records the
SoC's own thermal guard (85 C passive, 90 C critical, no heatsink on the
factory board) and the board temperatures at idle.

Catalog: cooling.gate-off checks the die field, the unthrottled state at
idle and the widened run-end line (the unit fake mirrors it). COOLING
section 9 and the SERVICES verification status describe the present.
2026-08-22 14:24:50 -04:00
ScottW514 9fae47cf14 The critical tier proven on a rising loop; the board temperatures watched
forgectrl pin 76115fd: the chassis LM75 and the supply sensor ride /status
as temps (degrees and a raw count), the engine ranges them over every run
session into one run-end line, and a critical fault that clears with its
session yields the reason to the standing hold.

Bench: critical_tier_drill.py (a bench tool now, registered as
critical-tier) sets the ceiling, the resume gate and the critical line a
few tenths above the live upstream reading and lets the engine's own
flow-check heater warm the loop through them inside one M8 session;
temp_calibrate.py gains supply-watch, supply-point and supply-fit for the
supply sensor against a thermometer on its heatsink, the fit shown beside
UAPI.md's unverified guess.

Catalog: cooling.gate-off checks the /status temps fields and the run-end
board-temperature line (the unit fake mirrors both, one new failure
case); cooling.critical-tier checks the reason after a faulted session.

Docs: CAMPAIGN-LOG entries for cooling.critical-tier on dev image
20260822154257 and the warm-loop drill (OVERTEMP at 10 s, CRITICAL at
14 s, the fault ending with the session); BRINGUP item 19, the facts bank
(board temperatures at idle), COOLING section 9, the bench README.
2026-08-22 12:56:40 -04:00
ScottW514 f51140e528 The coolant critical tier, with its catalog test
forgectrl pin a1875a8: cool_temp_critical_c (default 38 C) is the fail
tier above the coolant ceiling's pause: at or over it in a run session the
verdict is CRITICAL (fire blocked, hold, no resume this job), the fault
ends with the session, the settings API keeps it above the ceiling, and
its top turns the gate off.

Catalog: cooling.critical-tier (auto, 45 tests), driven through the
settings API like cooling.gate-off: a critical line at the ceiling is
refused (and undone should it ever be accepted); with the ceiling, the
resume gate and the critical line all under the coolant's temperature a
session reads CRITICAL rather than OVERTEMP with no resume and the reason
naming the tier and the coolant; after the session the ceiling alone
holds (OVERTEMP); with the critical line at its top the gate is off
(gates_off, the run-start log line) and the ceiling alone pauses;
restored, OK with nothing off. Four unit cases against a scripted engine.
_after_session takes the condition to wait for.

Docs: COOLING (verdict table, section 5, the settings table, the quick
reference), BRINGUP item 19 and the catalog count, the CAMPAIGN-LOG
paragraph for the fan-fault session rule on dev image 20260822145201.
2026-08-22 11:41:18 -04:00
ScottW514 c1591e4f69 The fan floors proven on a pinned image; a fan fault ends with its session
The dated record of dev image 20260822135848: the campaign of every
non-operator, non-live test at 18 of 18 PASS with the measured floors and
the operating-point rule (cooling.fan-gate-trips and the hunt leg of
cloud.mode-switch as recorded), and the unplugged-exhaust-fan drill:
AIRFLOW at the grace plus three ticks with the exhaust dead, the other
fans held, the reason relayed on the Grbl port, the replugged fan ok
inside the next session's grace.

The drill showed the fault riding into idle, where the hold canceled
jogs and would have refused the cloud print that re-proves the fan.
forgectrl pin d51dbdb: the fault ends with its run session, and the next
session judges every fan afresh. cooling.fan-gate-trips checks the
verdict is OK with no hold once the tripped session is over (the unit
fake mirrors it); its covers, and the cooling tests' shared covers, gain
src/coolfmt.* (the tree manifest carries the new files at the bumped pin,
and the lint was right to ask). cloud.mode-switch samples the hunt's gate
rows twice a second: a hunt's run phase is a few seconds long.

Docs: COOLING 3a, BRINGUP item 19, CAMPAIGN-LOG.
2026-08-22 10:46:41 -04:00
ScottW514 adcd1adb9a Fan floors from the measurement; a hunt is measured, not judged
forgectrl pin 47e4256: the airflow floors set from the bench measurement
(exhaust 6400, intake 2290, air assist 6000 rpm, purge current 300, grace
15 s) and the operating-point rule: a fan is judged while the laser is
armed, when a job's profile may raise it but never lower it below the run
duty, or whenever it is commanded at the run duty; the service's hunts,
sent with the extraction fans off, are measured and published unjudged.

Catalog: cloud.mode-switch now waits out the connect-time hunt sampling
/cool/status and requires no AIRFLOW, the exhaust row unjudged and the
exhaust actually off; its covers gain forgectrl src/cool.* and
src/airflow.*. cooling.fan-gate-trips uses an 8 s test grace (the
intakes take 7 s to 90 percent and tripped under the old 2 s at the new
floor) and its off leg waits for the row state as well as gates_off.
fan_floor_measure.py names a reply that is not JSON and calls the purge
readings idle and run (the pump is always on).

Docs: COOLING 3a and the settings table, BRINGUP item 19 and a facts-bank
entry with the measured fan speeds, the bench README, and a CAMPAIGN-LOG
entry for the measurement, the two status-document finds, the hunt find
and the hot-deployed bench runs of both tests.
2026-08-22 09:56:53 -04:00
ScottW514 0bddc9eeab cooling.fan-gate-trips: a fan under its floor is a fault; pin the airflow gates
The acceptance catalog gains the test behind forgectrl 5a31d66: an
exhaust floor at the legal maximum must trip AIRFLOW after the grace and
three ticks (hold, fire blocked, no resume, the exhaust gate TRIPPED and
named in the reason); a purge current floor at the ADC rail must trip
the same way; an exhaust floor of zero must read off in gates_off and
trip nothing; restored, the next session must run OK with every fan at
or above its floor. Three host cases against a scripted engine that
models the grace and the readings. The covers map names src/airflow.*.

COOLING.md gains 3a (the airflow gates) and the five settings with their
ranges and bands; SERVICES.md the gate rule, the rows, the AIRFLOW
verdict and fan_gates; SAFETY.md names the floors among the verdict's
inputs; BRINGUP item 19 records the gates as in with provisional floors
and the catalog at 44. Pins: forgectrl 5a31d66, forgefirm-app 81027ff
(0.1.15+git); fetch-verified.
2026-08-21 19:00:06 -04:00
ScottW514 5249c1ecf8 CAMPAIGN-LOG: the job's limits pass through on a live session
cloud.pause-resume passed on dev image 20260821220926 with the service's
hunt windows (10 to 50 C) ignored as looser and the print's window (33 C,
5 C floor, 116 rpm air-assist floor) matched. The test now quotes the
print's job-limits line rather than the session's first (a hunt's), and
keeps the engine line that carries the header beside the last one.
forgectrl pin moves to e0b41b3 (the "not stricter" notice once per value).
2026-08-21 18:39:43 -04:00
ScottW514 d530f773e2 cloud.pause-resume reads the job's limits through; pin the pass-through
The pulse header's envelope now reaches the cooling engine: the cloud
client (python3-gfhardware c34faa1) derives the coolant window and the
fans' minimum speeds from the header and rides them on every report,
and the engine (forgectrl 57f6064) resolves each as the stricter of its
setting and the job's, never looser and never overruling an off gate.
cloud.pause-resume, which runs a real print, now also reads the client's
"job limits from the header:" line and the engine's "effective limits:"
line from the two logs; two host cases cover the failure paths. The
needle guard lists the engine's phrases as not the app's.

COOLING.md section 2 explains what a cloud job brings with it; BRINGUP
item 19 records the pass-through as landed. Pins: forgectrl 57f6064,
forgefirm-app c34faa1 (0.1.14+git); fetch-verified.
2026-08-21 18:07:41 -04:00
ScottW514 8ad3f79e26 CAMPAIGN-LOG: cooling.gate-off passes on the bench
First bench run of the gate-settings pattern: PASS on dev image
20260821210903 after the harness fix in f274eb1; the entry records the
failed first attempt and why it was the test's fault. BRINGUP item 19
carries the bench result.
2026-08-21 17:48:10 -04:00
ScottW514 bf3483e994 cooling.gate-off: a gate setting trips in range and is off at its far end
The acceptance catalog gains the test behind forgectrl 9e44fdc: the
coolant ceiling set just over its legal minimum must trip OVERTEMP with
a hold and fire blocked at the next run start; set to its top the engine
must skip the gate (verdict OK), report it in gates_off on /status and
/cool/status, and log the run-start line; the original values are
restored, on failure too, and proven restored. Five host cases against a
scripted engine. The cooling covers map now names the files that carry
gate state (gates, settings, status, the panel) and corrects a glob that
matched nothing: the GRBL cooling client is src/glowforge_cooling.c, not
src/gfcool*. The fake forgectrl serves /logs/tail and keeps blank form
values as "clear", which is what the daemon does with them.

Docs: COOLING.md section 8 carries each setting's legal range and
recommended band and a new 8a on turning a gate off; SAFETY.md names
what no setting can reach; ACCEPTANCE.md records that gates are
exercised through the settings API, never GFCOOL_* env overrides;
BRINGUP item 19 records the pattern as landed and the catalog is 43.

forgectrl pin moves to 9e44fdc; fetch-verified.
2026-08-21 17:06:49 -04:00
ScottW514 f4b70a0826 BRINGUP: the first pin-file campaign is done; pin the cloud client
The full acceptance campaign on dev image 20260821181036, the first built on
the <recipe>-pin.inc layout, satisfied 42 of 42 and its export authorizes a
release, so the status header, the acceptance section and item 12 describe
that rather than a campaign still owed; the catalog count is 42, not 35.
CAMPAIGN-LOG records the completion. Item 7 stops listing the cloud work the
campaign closed (the oversize live print, the progress bar watched from the
app, packaged-path cloud boot, the lid flash), records the operator's
declines (SPKI pinning, emulator parity, the ten-event pause machine) and the
reasoned memory guards, and item 19 no longer lists MCsn and PDfm as
unchecked: the client refuses both, so seventeen mandatory tags are dropped,
not nineteen.

forgefirm-app pin moves to b82d379 (python3-gfhardware): CLOUD.md and three
present-tense comments, no behavior change. No catalog consequence beyond the
pin bump itself, which the manifest scopes to the component.
2026-08-21 15:34:25 -04:00
ScottW514 3f4cd2b621 Close the unobserved actions in the cloud item
They were open because the service has never sent them and cannot be asked
to. That is not a reason to leave them open: the factory application says
what each one does, and it says all four are hand-offs to programs this
machine does not have. BRINGUP's cloud item now records the disposition
rather than the question.
2026-08-20 15:39:40 -04:00
ScottW514 aaabfdf9b9 Check the progress a print reports, where a print already runs
Two tests already run a print end to end, and progress is a property of a
running print, so the checks go there rather than into a test of their own
that would cost the operator another job.

cloud.pause-resume takes the job that fits the ring: the client names the
length it is reporting against, and the operator is asked the question only a
person can answer, whether the bar actually moved.

cloud.oversize-stream takes the job that does not fit, which is where a moving
denominator would show: the kernel's program total grows all run long under a
live feed, and the test already samples it growing, so the check is that the
figure progress divides by is larger than that - the job, not the count the
ring had swallowed when the run started.

The forgetest replay plays a captured log from a build that predates the line,
so it carries the line where the current build emits it, as it already does
for the warm-up and the rest.

BRINGUP's cloud item now says a print reports itself again, and what is left
on it is a print watched from the app.
2026-08-20 14:16:27 -04:00
ScottW514 0ef2047625 Record what the factory does about progress
The campaign log gains the F1 entry: the question was which of three carriers
the factory uses for the progress bar, and the answer is that two of them
collapse into one. Progress rides an outbound WSS type:"progress" frame that is
itself the periodic settings report, every 30 s. The write-up lives in CLOUD.md;
the log records how it was gotten and what else the capture proved, including a
factory progress total that grew 256 KiB per interval because the factory
live-appends to its own ring.

BRINGUP's cloud item now lists F2 among the open work with the carrier settled,
so what is owed is emitting the frame against the feeder's job total rather
than the kernel byte counter.

Documentation only, no behavior change, so no acceptance-catalog consequence.
2026-08-20 13:28:43 -04:00
ScottW514 d122a6ff1d Check a print's warm-up and rest where a print already runs
cloud.pause-resume runs a print end to end, which is exactly what the job
lifecycle needs to be seen: a non-zero hold before the first fire, a non-zero
rest after the park, and neither on the connect-time hunt in the same
session. Folding the checks in there costs the operator nothing, where a
test of its own would cost another print.

The forgetest replay noticed first: it plays a real captured log from a build
that predates those lines. Rather than editing what the machine said that
day, the replay carries the two lines where the current build emits them.

BRINGUP's cloud item now names what is actually open on the header keys, the
park and the two periods, and records that the pause constants were looked
for in the wrong place.
2026-08-20 10:05:38 -04:00
ScottW514 e3d23b8099 Record the download guards and the feed watchdog
BRINGUP's cloud item said a print is capped by the ring and listed the two
gaps that closed when it stopped being. It now says what bounds a print
(memory, through pulse_reject_threshold_bytes) and what catches a feed that
wedges (progress against room, not ring depth), and it names the two new
cases that cannot be induced from the bench: a body past the memory guard,
because the service has no such job to send, and a wedged feed, because a
healthy machine will not stall on request.

forgectrl.settings-bounds gains a probe at the far end of the new byte
range, so the validator behind those keys is exercised rather than assumed.
2026-08-20 09:23:10 -04:00
ScottW514 942d9dde99 Drill the backtrack boundary, and pause a streamed print
kernel.backtrack-bounds plays a program, stops it, and holds the readback
to the bytes it played less the deceleration tail: a step past the boundary
has to be refused rather than quietly shortened, and the run at the boundary
has to play out and come back idle. Motors locked, latch locked, duty zero,
so nothing moves and nothing fires.

cloud.oversize-stream pauses and resumes the live-fed print it already has
running. That is the pause the kernel change makes possible, and it costs a
minute of a job that is on the bed either way.

BRINGUP's pause bullet, its ring facts and item 18 all said a ring under a
live feed has nothing left to back into. The gap the writer keeps clear says
otherwise; what is still open for GRBL mode is the bookkeeping above the
ring, not the kernel below it.
2026-08-20 07:41:41 -04:00
ScottW514 4300f7f4a8 Follow the pulse ring to 32 MiB
The ring and the device-tree pool that backs it are now the size the
factory firmware runs. Docs follow, and the hardware facts bank gains the
reserved-memory map: 511 MiB usable, 96 MiB reserved for DMA, ~454 MiB
left to Linux.

image.health reads the pool size and ring_mb back and fails if they
disagree, so a pool the parameter does not use cannot ship unnoticed, and
checks that free never exceeds the ring less its gap.
2026-08-19 21:21:30 -04:00
ScottW514 4a6bd5a179 docs: record what the factory does about fans, temperature and coolant
Next-work item 19 carried three open questions about the factory's
operating envelope. All three are answered now, so the item states the
policy instead of the guess.

A fan tach alert during a cut pauses the print, taking the same transition
a user pause takes, and two of the factory's three tach monitors cannot
fire at all: they treat a zero limit as unconfigured and the limits arrive
zero anyway. So a stalled extraction fan is caught by the temperature it
causes, not by its tachometer. Every temperature alert pauses as well, and
a critical fails the machine outright, which is a different state and not a
pause. The scale question behind the header's ceilings is answered by the
coolant family, which the factory carries twice, once in raw ADC counts
where the tag named min is the hot limit, and once in millidegrees. And the
factory does not verify coolant flow at all, so the cooling engine's flow
check is ahead of the factory rather than behind it.

The crash, tilt and beam-detect bullets gain the same grading: an alert
threshold that pauses and a separate abort threshold that aborts.

Also drops references to paths that resolve outside this repo, in both
documents and in two bench scripts, naming the artifact instead. In
CAMPAIGN-LOG that is a wording substitution only; no date, claim or
measurement changes.

Documentation only, so no acceptance catalog consequence.
2026-08-19 17:23:02 -04:00
ScottW514 7012c7d1b2 Homing is lid-gated in practice; only the cloud hunt is not
MOTION said jogs, homing and hunts were all ungated. Jogs are:
gfsw_visible withholds the door signal while the core is idle, jogging or
homing, so a jog both starts and runs with the lid open. Homing is not.
With homing_mode = gfcloud - the only method that works today - $H hands
the cycle to a cloud homing session, and its move to the home corner is
an ordinary motion action taking the default lid_gated=True: refused with
the lid open, stopped on a lid edge mid-run. Only the lens/Z hunt inside
that session passes lid_gated=False, and that session is also the only
place a hunt happens in GRBL mode - there is no hunt outside one.

BRINGUP gains item 18: GRBL pause and resume should leave no gap in the
cut, the way the factory's does. The beam stops at the start of the hold
(disable_laser_during_hold, on by default), so the head travels the whole
deceleration dark and the resume restarts from a standstill where the
decel ended - an unburned length, then a dwell through the accel that M3
shows as a deeper spot. The kernel waypoint backtrack cloud mode uses is
refused with EPERM on a live-streamed ring, so the equivalent has to be
built above the ring, where grblHAL still holds the planned path the
kernel has already overwritten.

Two wording fixes: the cooling verdict is described as a report rather
than a file, and gfcloud homing as using the machine's builtin
credentials.

Documentation only - no behavior change, so no acceptance-catalog
consequence.
2026-08-18 07:41:37 -04:00
ScottW514 0c2dd37b2f Cover both dose models explicitly now that density is the default
grblHAL-glowforge 03d70e0, pinned here, makes density the shipped model
and $35 the density floor at 10. Every analog session in the stream
harness now selects its model rather than inheriting it: without that the
flip would have quietly turned them into density runs and taken the
analog fallback's coverage with them. laser.power-floor carries the new
floor and its PWMSAR minimum, and its description no longer describes
$35 as a duty floor.

All ten stream sessions pass on the new defaults, with the analog duties
shifting exactly as the floor predicts - min_value 12, gradient 0.115 -
along with both C harnesses and the lifecycle harness.

Recorded in BRINGUP and the campaign log, including what the defaults
rest on and what they do not: the seven ladders ran at F300 and F100 at
constant power, so production feeds, M4 into corners and the raster path
remain unproven on hardware.
2026-08-17 22:03:56 -04:00
ScottW514 1e855ab212 The density floor closes the low end: a commanded 1 percent now marks
$35 = 10 under the density model is a density floor, not a duty floor. It
maps S onto 9.4-100 percent density, so a commanded 1 percent lands at
10.2 percent, just above the marking floor the earlier ladders measured.
A ladder reweighted to the bottom of the user scale - 1, 2, 5, 10, 20,
40, 70, 100 percent of S - marked on all eight rungs, with eight current
segments over a 42.0 s window against exactly 8 x 5.25, and segment means
climbing 136 to 968.

That meets the goal the ladders started from: a user's 1 percent is a
real visible mark rather than silence, and 100 percent is full power. It
took all three pieces - density so every level is real pulses, the
minimum pulse so they stay strikeable, the floor so the user's range sits
on the band that works.

dladder no longer tells the operator to re-run at other base periods to
choose one. The period cancels out of the low end, and what a failing
rung now indicates is a floor set too low.
2026-08-17 21:58:05 -04:00
ScottW514 d7c23cce19 A longer minimum pulse is worse: the gap is what decides striking
min_ticks 6 broke 5 percent striking - seven current segments where 3 gave
eight, on a 36.5 s fire window against 41.4 s for eight rungs. Below the
minimum the model emits min ticks every min/on periods, so the interval
between pulses is min_ticks x tick / density and the base period cancels,
which is also why periods 10, 20 and 40 gave identical results earlier.
At 5 percent that is 2.26 ms at min 3, which struck, against 4.51 ms at 6,
which did not: doubling the minimum doubles the gap as well as the pulse,
and the discharge is re-struck each pulse.

min 3 sits at the factory's own operating point - its 6.5 percent engrave
jobs place 100 us pulses 1.54 ms apart against 1.64 ms for min 3 at that
density - and 6 is outside anything the factory does. The bench is back
at 3.

Measured band for this tube: strikes from ~5 percent density, marks from
~10 percent at F300. That closes the pulse-structure route to a usable
1 percent, since the interval grows as 1/density and 1 percent implies an
11 ms gap. The low end is a scaling problem, and $35 is the control.
2026-08-17 21:52:15 -04:00
ScottW514 ff454ed537 Retract the pulse-length conclusion; show the minimum in the drill table
The fifth ladder, the first with a minimum pulse, moved the floor down a
full rung: only 5 percent failed to mark, and 5 percent now strikes. The
trace carries eight current segments where the run before it had seven,
with fire beginning at 6.2 s exactly at rung 1 and the usual flat
saturated final segment anchoring the count from the other end.

That retracts what the previous entry concluded. Pulse length is not
irrelevant: 10 percent moved from no mark at F100, with three times the
dose per millimeter, to a mark at F300 at the same density, the only
change being its pulses growing from 36-71 us stubs to 106 us. The
matched-pairs argument was sound but drawn entirely from comparisons at
or above 20 percent density, where every pulse length in play was already
long enough - it generalized from the one regime where pulse length does
not bite. Above ~100 us dose governs; below it pulse length does; below
~36 us the supply does not strike. The factory's 100 us quantum sits on
that boundary.

dladder now reads laser_pulse_min_ticks and prints what is actually
emitted. Without that its table reports the pulse density alone would
give, which is wrong wherever the minimum applies - at min 6 the bottom
four rungs all emit 213 us and vary their rate instead, and the operator
reads that table to interpret the material.
2026-08-17 21:47:40 -04:00
ScottW514 a3e83c4fd5 Cover the minimum pulse width; record what the density ladders measured
Rule 15 in the stream harness holds both halves of the minimum
(grblHAL-glowforge f7e8c17, pinned here): no emitted burst falls below
laser_pulse_min_ticks, excepting one clipped by fire going off mid-burst,
and the levels too faint to fill a window still render their exact
average density. Checked against a run at minimum 1 so it cannot pass
vacuously - level 2 goes from 444 bursts of one tick to 147 of three at
the same density, and levels already above the minimum are unchanged.

Four bench ladders settle the base period at 20. The same six rungs
marked in all of them, and the matched pairs across periods separate the
variables: at identical pulse length, halving the density killed the
mark; at identical density, varying the pulse 3x changed nothing. Feed
does not move it either - 10 percent at F100 carries 44 percent more
energy per mm than 20 percent at F300, which marks, and still left
nothing. The low-end marking limit is average power, not dose per length
and not pulse length.

The F100 trace separates two failures that look alike on the material:
seven current segments for eight rungs, anchored by a flat saturated
final segment that can only be full density, put 5 percent at no
discharge at all and 10 percent at a full 15 seconds of current with no
mark. Only the first is ours, and the minimum pulse is the answer to it.

Also recorded: the factory's Precision Power 1 runs a 19.53 percent FIRE
duty cycle at full PWM duty, and its 1-100 scale maps onto density
18.9-79.5 percent, so its 1 percent is the bottom of the useful band
rather than 1 percent of the range. Under the density model $35 and $36
are that same control - a density floor and ceiling - which makes the
user-facing scale a settings choice rather than new code.
2026-08-17 21:37:41 -04:00
ScottW514 c2c627d9b6 Prove the density dose model host-side; close the idle-gap level loss
Four new sessions in the stream harness cover the model (grblHAL-glowforge
2bca017, pinned here). Density renders the commanded level exactly -
levels 2, 3, 7, 15, 25 and 38 came back as 0.0158, 0.0237, 0.0551,
0.1182, 0.1969 and 0.2993 against level/127 of 0.01575, 0.02362, 0.05512,
0.11811, 0.19685 and 0.29921 - S1000 renders 1.0000 and still ends dark,
every power byte carries full duty, and a level change inside a run costs
no stream byte where analog ships one per level.

Rule 13 is the one worth having: the same job run under both models
produces an identical motion grid tick for tick, and all 20051 density
FIRE ticks fall inside the 169776 the analog run fired. The model masks
the core's fire state and never sources one, measured rather than argued.

Rule 14 covers the idle-gap fix: a standalone S between moves, from a
sender slow enough to drain the planner, now fires each move at its own
level (28338 ticks each at duties 30, 52 and 84). Before the fix duty 30
held all 85014 and the other two levels never appeared. That closes
"Next work" item 18, which this work opened earlier today.

The harness now derives its expectations from the board's floor and
chains two launches over one settings file, because the core precomputes
the S to duty mapping once when the spindle is enabled: $35 written at
runtime persists and reports immediately but only enters force at the
next controller start. That is recorded in BRINGUP beside the existing
defaults note, and laser.power-floor's failure message now says so.

Acceptance: the density path shipping off by default is inert until
laser_power_model is set, and the laser tests' covers already name
grblhal-glowforge src/**; the model's own acceptance test waits on the
bench drill that picks the base period.
2026-08-17 20:24:43 -04:00
ScottW514 cb41a6030c Commission the laser duty floor; record how the factory sets power
The pthresh ladder on scrap puts the tube's two thresholds far apart: the
discharge strikes between 2 and 3 percent duty, but nothing lases usefully
below 16 percent (PWMSAR 20), and the rungs between show only a spot at
each line start. $35 ships at 16 (grblhal-glowforge 9466f76, pinned here).

The drill said current lift-off and first mark share a rung; this run
falsifies that, so its docstring and read-the-material text now name both
thresholds and warn that a start-of-line spot is below the threshold, not
at it.

A start-of-line spot is also what a full-power leak at a kernel run start
would look like, so laser_stream_test gains a ladder session (rule 10):
every FIRE tick must ride a commanded duty, and the fire ticks must divide
evenly across rungs. Both hold exactly - six commanded duties, no others,
and 28296 fire ticks on every rung - so the spots are the tube, not the
stream. The harness now derives its expectations from the floor, which
moves the M4 session's S500 plateau from 63 to 73.

laser.power-floor is a new auto acceptance test, the suite's only
non-firing one: a machine must actually carry the commissioned floor,
since stored settings beat freshly baked defaults.

Three cloud cuts of one square at Precision Power 1, 100 and Full Power
show what the analog path is competing with: the power byte is pinned at
127 in all three, dose is FIRE-bit density on a fixed 7-tick period with
the on-count dithered between adjacent integers, and the power setting
never reaches the machine at all. Facts bank and item 17 carry the
numbers; CAMPAIGN-LOG carries both sessions.
2026-08-17 19:45:19 -04:00
ScottW514 64a720bbab Pin the producer-lead change; record what the bench measured
Bump the grblHAL pin to the producer lead and margin instrumentation.

Rewrite BRINGUP item 16 to the present state. The scheduling half is
done - the producer runs SCHED_FIFO below the shipper, core_mx carries
priority inheritance, and clamping is reported per run - and two bench
runs 90 s apart on one image show what that does and does not cover: a
nice-5 CPU hog passes clean while the camera streaming clamps 7 runs,
because per-frame cache maintenance over a 4.8 MB non-coherent capture
buffer is kernel-context work no userspace priority can preempt.

Record the margin finding, since it explains why a 4 ms stall was
enough: the queue depth cancels between the shipper's due index and the
producer's base, so the pacing lead is the only slack. Record the
cycle-churn ceiling that caps that lead at 10 ms, and that the re-base
fix is what unlocks more.

Camera gating stays owed, with capture resolution named as the lever
that shortens the stall rather than merely spacing stalls out.
2026-08-17 17:59:11 -04:00
ScottW514 faaa6cb40b Cover step timing under CPU contention; record the laser power model
Bump the grblHAL pin to the real-time producer change.

Add motion.step-timing-under-load: the catalog had nothing that
exercised step generation while userspace competed for the single core,
which is exactly the gap that let the condition go unnoticed - the ring
never runs dry, so cnc/underruns reads 0 through it. The test asserts
the producer and the shipper both hold SCHED_FIFO, then drives
2000 mm/min round trips against a deliberate nice-5 CPU hog and requires
the controller to report no clamped events.

Add the pthresh live-fire drill: a constant-power ladder from 2 % to
30 % of full on scrap. Because $35 is a percent of full duty and the
rungs are percents of $30 with $31 = 0, the lowest rung that marks reads
directly as the $35 value. It needs $35 = 0 for the run, or the floor
lifts every rung and hides the threshold.

Record both open items in BRINGUP. The laser one carries the finding
that the factory never uses duty as a power control - all five firing
jobs in the captured pulse files pin the power byte at 127 and modulate
dose by dithering the FIRE bit at 6.5-18.8 % density - so the captures
cannot supply a $35 default, and the duty to optical-power transfer
function of this supply has never been measured.
2026-08-17 16:45:37 -04:00
ScottW514 c425822b82 docs, acceptance: the cameras as users meet them, and 8 MP at full resolution
docs/VIDEO.md is the user-facing camera guide: what the endpoints return, what
the sensors can do that ForgeFIRM does not send and why, the privacy gate, and
the state of 8 MP support.

The 8 MP (OV8856) capture path now reaches the sensor's full 3264x2448 frame.
Its stock RAW10 full-resolution mode runs the link at 1.44 Gbps/lane and the
i.MX6 CSI-2 D-PHY stops at 1 Gbps; the BSP adds a RAW8 mode that carries the
same frame at half the rate, so an HD machine is no longer limited to the
binned quarter-pixel mode. kas/README.md carries the reasoning, the register
deltas and the factory configuration to fall back to if the receiver will not
lock at 720 Mbps/lane.

Acceptance: camera.sensor-profile expects the new OV8856 geometry, the camera
covers map names src/camhealth.* (the src/cam.* glob does not match it, so the
lint would have gone quiet on an uncovered file at the next pin bump), and a
new auto test camera.frame-health asserts a burst of captures with no frames
the capture queue flagged errored - a real signal about the camera ribbon even
though those frames never reach a client.
2026-08-17 14:34:36 -04:00
ScottW514 05d68ba0a8 docs: BRINGUP describes the present, CAMPAIGN-LOG carries the dated record
BRINGUP had grown to 3,122 lines in which the same subject was answered
differently depending on where the reader stopped: GATE A "stays open, no
live-fire" in the phase text and closed in the campaign record, the catalog
at 24 tests in one section and 35 in another, several "bench validation
pending" headings over bodies that recorded the pass.

Split by kind rather than by age. BRINGUP (907 lines) is the present state
only - status, bench runbook, laser, lid/interlock/button policy, homing,
forgectrl, diagnostics, logging, release acceptance, the measured facts
bank, and a Next work list of the 15 items that are actually open.
CAMPAIGN-LOG (2,657 lines) takes the dated blocks verbatim, in
chronological order, and is append-only: a correction is a later entry, not
an edit. Its two reading rules are stated up front, since moved text keeps
its original "above"/"below" and its pre-split item numbers.

Facts corrected against the tree while rewriting: the liveness probe gates
at p2p 800, not 500, with the real wedge, noise and jolt figures; the panel
has seven tabs including Logs and is built from src/ui/, not ui.c; the
devserver replaced tools/mock.py; /status reports real head presence; the
estop_halts_motion opt-in is gone; core PR #999 is merged, leaving only the
step_us_min commit fork-only; the update system stands at Phase 5, the
uSDHC pads and the 2026-08-08 kernel batch have shipped, and 8 MP camera
capture is tracked here for the first time.

SAFETY and UPDATE-SYSTEM point their drill records at the log. ACCEPTANCE
records that inheritance is local: there is no import of a published
artifact, so a second bench starts from a full campaign - one of the four
open items the retired tool plan held, the rest of which are now in
BRINGUP's acceptance item.

Documentation only, no behavior change and no catalog consequence: docs/
is outside every layer and .md is excluded from the layer content hash.
2026-08-17 11:19:52 -04:00
ScottW514 74adaf40b8 BRINGUP: lid / button / interlock parity is done; items 4 and 12 close with it
Item 16 becomes the record of what the machine does rather than a list of
what is left: both modes cancel a job on a lid or interlock open - running
or paused - and return the head to where the job started with the lid still
open; the park ignores the lid; the arm wait cancels with the reason named;
the button pauses and resumes, with the factory's backtrack and lead in cloud
mode and feed hold / cycle start in GRBL; lid_policy = hold keeps the stock
door behavior for senders that want it. Item 4's mid-job Door hold is that
policy now, and item 12's LightBurn door handling is closed by the cancel -
LightBurn never lives in Door on the default path.

The GRBL resume dwell that was left open is decided against, on measurement
rather than on the mark: the chain re-arms within ~3 ms of the resume while
motion restarts ~219 ms later, so there is nothing to cover.

The two planning files at the tree root are merged and removed, as the audit
plans were. What was durable in them lives here now: the factory's own
reaction timings on 2.6.0-2228, the pause/resume behavior of the safety chain
at pad resolution, and why the hardware button latch is what makes the armed
window honest. The factory session log they were written from is archived
under _RESOURCES/.

Item 15 gains the catalog's current shape: 35 tests after the parity work and
the sweep that merged the tests sharing a setup, with the auto tests left
separate.
2026-08-17 10:02:25 -04:00
ScottW514 86ce0419e5 forgetest: cloud tests stay in cloud mode; the page can ignore prerequisites
The cloud job tests (lid-abort, lid-during-button-wait, hunt-lid-open,
pause-resume) run in cloud mode and leave the machine there: enter_cloud
reuses a live session (pid-scoped from the client's own websocket state
lines) and switches once from GRBL mode, declaring the change to the
baseline; nothing switches back. Each test judges the log from its own
window, the print by its own "print [id]: finished" line, and waits the
service's follow-up moves out (wait_quiet) before it ends. hunt-lid-open
restarts the cloud client through the supervisor's stop/start lever for
a fresh connect. The former switch-back is what failed the last bench run
of hunt-lid-open (409 machine is not idle: the service was still
re-finding the head after the lid closed).

The baseline is mode-aware: in cloud mode the client owns the GRBL
controller's init values, the lid lamp, and the position counters; the
mode itself is preserved unless the run declared the change
(Context.mode_changed); controller_mode is never handed back as a bare
setting (a bare write left the persisted mode out of step with the live
one). The undeclared-change restore now uses the captured state, which
the post pass never saw before.

The acceptance page gets an "Ignore prerequisites" switch (remembered by
the browser): POST /start {ignore_requires} starts a test whose requires
are unmet, and the run records the unmet prerequisites in its evidence
and log; they stay required for the release. The cloud tests' requires
no longer chain through cloud.mode-switch.

Proof: tests/test_cloud_suite.py replays the four tests on the bench's
own gfcloud excerpts (fixtures/) and the run loop's emitted pause/resume
lines under the real runner Context against a fake forgectrl; baseline
mode tests and the server override test; the whole suite (98) and the
coverage lint pass. Catalog consequence: cloud.* fingerprints move with
the module; the catalog hash moves with the requires.
2026-08-17 06:42:48 -04:00
ScottW514 9878c8d3b9 forgetest: kernel counters prove the return, and ring residue is a leftover that blocks the jog
The lid-cancel tests (motion.lid-cancel-home, laser.lid-cancel-mid-fire)
now check that the KERNEL position counters returned to the job start,
not only grbl's MPos - grbl's drift read 0.000 while the head had not
moved. The baseline reports unplayed bytes queued in the kernel ring
(cnc/position total minus processed) as a leftover and refuses its
return jog while any exist: a run started on top of them replays them
first, which is what put the head into the rail. BRINGUP item 16 records
the bench finding and the stream-engine fix.
2026-08-16 20:47:32 -04:00
ScottW514 b68d790b71 baseline: take the fresh-boot reference after the controller applied its config
/mode reports controller=running at the spawn, so the reference dump
raced grblHAL's init writes and captured the supervisor's motion-probe
values (motor_lock 0, step_freq 10000, y_mode at the module default)
instead of the resting state. boot_reference() now waits for the
controller's markers (step_freq/motor_lock/y_mode at their fixed values,
bounded 20 s, GRBL mode only) plus a 1 s settle before dumping, retakes
a saved reference that shows the pre-config state while the boot is
still fresh, and marks it otherwise. Tests cover the wait, its timeout,
the non-GRBL no-op, the pre-config recognition and the retake.
2026-08-16 20:00:08 -04:00
ScottW514 914c72f8e5 BRINGUP item 16: the arm-wait cancel is a clean soft reset 2026-08-16 19:31:53 -04:00
ScottW514 c4ea96127c Lid/button parity: harness cases, acceptance tests, operator and safety docs, BRINGUP item 16
laser_lifecycle_test.py: the button toggle (press = Hold, press = Run;
the arming press is not a pause), lid and interlock cancel mid-job with
the return to the job start and no alarm, and lid_policy=hold.

Acceptance catalog: motion.button-hold-resume, motion.lid-cancel-home
(operator: travel job, lid open -> cancel message, banner, no alarm,
autonomous return, Idle at the start), laser.lid-cancel-mid-fire (live:
emission stops in hardware, cancelled, returned, armed=false, latch
locked, hardware button latch SET). covers name the switch and laser
sources explicitly.

LIGHTBURN.md: what the lid, Stop and the button now do; SAFETY.md: the
door policy and the button as a software layer; BRINGUP.md: item 16
records the whole parity change (host-proven, bench validation pending)
and items 4/12 point at it.
2026-08-16 19:26:11 -04:00
ScottW514 cd8a01a3d9 bench: every board-runnable tool ported to the bench page
The remaining bench diagnostics run from forgetest's #bench tab. The
tools that also run from a LAN host share scripts/bench/gfbench.py:
GF_HOST names a remote machine (host mode, sysfs through ssh, Grbl and
forgectrl over the LAN); unset, the tool runs on the board itself
(local mode, sysfs directly, everything on 127.0.0.1), which is how the
page runs them - with GF_HOST=127.0.0.1, the panel token in GF_TOKEN
and their data files under <data>/bench/ (FORGETEST_BENCH_DATA). The
helper also reads a machine setting from forgectrl, or from the settings
file on the board while forgectrl is stopped.

Ported: pwm_sweep / pwm_hold (scope = a takeover; the latch relocked,
the write refused if FIRE or LASER_ON reads active), pwm_stream_test
(PASS/FAIL exit), flow_characterize, flow_recheck_char,
flow_warm_validate and flow_matrix (takeovers: forgectrl owns the
thermal hardware, so the page's takeover replaces the tools' own
controller stop/restart, whose command line predated the supervisor;
results and logs in the bench data directory), flow_sustained,
fan_test, temp_calibrate (dry; watch bounded in seconds; the threshold
and the coolant conversion from the shared code), flow_escalate_drill
(cool_confirm_max_s shortened through forgectrl's settings for the
drill and restored; the setting's minimum is the default budget), and
live_fire_drills (<drill> [S] [F], all six drills, host from GF_HOST,
token from the board). flow_matrix joins the registry. What stays
unported cannot run against the machine at all: the two null-sink CI
harnesses and the .puls decoder.

Runner: a scope tool runs inside the takeover wrapper; the bench
environment above is passed to every tool. Tests: test_bench_registry
(registry <-> scripts/bench consistency, every ported tool builds its
command line, every script compiles, gfbench host/local modes) and the
server test (scope tool takeover, the environment reaching the tool).
Local mode smoke-run on the bench (temp_calibrate watch, setting, token)
from /tmp, removed after.

No catalog consequence: bench tools are not image components (dev-only
forgetest); the acceptance catalog is unchanged.
2026-08-16 16:28:39 -04:00
ScottW514 b51e695fb1 manifest: component pins are not layer content
A component pin bump counted as a platform change: the layer content hash
in the platform identity covered the recipe carrying the SRCREV, the
platform is folded into every acceptance fingerprint, so every image
that carried any component update invalidated the whole catalog (dev
image 20260816191951: every test domain-changed after a one-line
forgectrl bump; the two manifests differ only in
platform.layers.meta-forgefirm). The component entry already identifies
the pinned source file by file; the pin double-counted it.

Component pins now live in <recipe>-pin.inc (SRCREV and the PV that
moves with it, nothing else) - forgectrl, grblhal-glowforge and
forgefirm-app here, the BSP components in meta-openglow - and
forgefirm-image-manifest.bbclass leaves *-pin.inc out of the layer
content (FORGEFIRM_MANIFEST_PIN_SUFFIX). Recipe bodies, patches, config
fragments, init scripts and third-party pins with no manifest entry stay
layer content; a pin written into a recipe body still hashes (the safe
direction). manifest-from-tree.py mirrors the rule and reads pins
through the recipe's requires; test_tree_manifest.py proves both
(pin bump: hash unchanged; recipe body or inline pin: changed).
Bitbake resolves the same SRCREV/PV for every pinned recipe.

Docs: ACCEPTANCE.md (what layer content is), kas/README.md (the pin
files in the push order), BRINGUP.md (the finding and the bench
consequence: the first image built with the pin files is itself a
platform change, so its campaign is a full one; pin bumps inherit
after it).

No catalog consequence: nothing in the image's behavior changes; the
change is to the acceptance identity computation, proven by the unit
tests and the CI lint on the tree manifest.
2026-08-16 16:06:58 -04:00
ScottW514 bf066d4e27 BRINGUP: images 20260816191838 / 20260816191951 built with forgectrl c8f6558 and the day's forgetest 2026-08-16 15:21:55 -04:00
ScottW514 57465d2c00 BRINGUP: item 15 - the acceptance tool is bench-validated; the confirmation run rides the next image 2026-08-16 15:12:48 -04:00