mirror of
https://github.com/openglow-org/forgefirm.git
synced 2026-09-28 01:01:12 -07:00
docs: the shakedown on 20260903163543, and the arm fix under live fire
The whole catalog ran green, 56 of 56, but on a hot-deployed suite file, so it authorizes nothing; the entry says so first. What it did was find the one real defect, the pic-soc-load bound that decided on a count of noise, and put the arm-acknowledgment fix under live fire: the emission witness passed with its airflow witness finding nothing, on the same instant button press that produced last night's burn. Also recorded: the boot clock that never stepped, and the bench fixture dropping off the network mid-queue with no address pinned to fall back to.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7722,6 +7722,71 @@ there were no QA warnings. This image supersedes 20260903011655 as the
|
|||||||
campaign's image, and the campaign must start again on it: three layer hashes
|
campaign's image, and the campaign must start again on it: three layer hashes
|
||||||
moved, so nothing is inherited.
|
moved, so nothing is inherited.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 2026-09-03: the shakedown on image 20260903163543, and the arm fix under fire
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The image went on the bench and the whole catalog ran. It does not authorize
|
||||||
|
that image, and it was never meant to: one suite file was hot-deployed part
|
||||||
|
way through, so the catalog on the machine is not the catalog in the image.
|
||||||
|
This pass was for finding defects, and the clean run on a rebuilt image is
|
||||||
|
the one that counts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Two things had to be cleared before any of it. The board came up with its
|
||||||
|
clock at March 2018 and the time daemon never stepped it, twenty-one minutes
|
||||||
|
in, with the large-step flag set and name resolution working. Every campaign
|
||||||
|
identifier and result would have carried that date, so the clock was set from
|
||||||
|
the workstation and written to the hardware clock, and the daemon disciplined
|
||||||
|
from there. Nothing in this image touches time keeping and the same pattern
|
||||||
|
appears on earlier boots, so this is not new, but it is worth a look on the
|
||||||
|
next cold boot. The fresh-boot reference itself was clean: eighty attributes,
|
||||||
|
no disagreement with the fixed values.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The unattended set then stopped at its seventh test on `kernel.pic-soc-load`.
|
||||||
|
The machine was not at fault. Over eleven runs the settle collapsed the load
|
||||||
|
dependence from a control split of six or seven counts to one, every time,
|
||||||
|
which is the drill's primary assertion and it never failed. What failed was
|
||||||
|
the third assertion, which asked the settled reader to move off the idle
|
||||||
|
regime by at least half the control split. The move is three counts against a
|
||||||
|
split of six, so the bound sat exactly on the median and decided on one count
|
||||||
|
of noise: two of the eleven runs failed while the machine read identically to
|
||||||
|
the nine that passed. The kernel's spin is a couple of counts lighter than a
|
||||||
|
Python spin, so a settled reader lands above the idle regime without reaching
|
||||||
|
the busy one, and asking it to reach halfway asked for something the mechanism
|
||||||
|
does not promise. The bound is now a third of the split, which still catches
|
||||||
|
the failure it guards, a settle that overshoots and lets the conversion fall
|
||||||
|
back to idle and so does not move at all, with a count of margin either way.
|
||||||
|
That file was hot-deployed and the set re-run: thirty-one of thirty-one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Then the attended ten, with the fix under live fire. `laser.emission-witness`
|
||||||
|
passed, and the evidence that matters is that its new airflow witness found
|
||||||
|
nothing: not one sample showed emission while the cooling engine was in a
|
||||||
|
phase that runs the fans at idle duty. The fixture pressed 0.3 s after the
|
||||||
|
button lit, the same instant press that produced last night's burn, and this
|
||||||
|
time the arm waited for the engine to take the job before the window opened.
|
||||||
|
Against last night's aborted run on the same test, emission peaked at 154
|
||||||
|
rather than 42 and the high-voltage current reached full scale rather than
|
||||||
|
236, because the job ran its whole square instead of a second of it. The
|
||||||
|
operator confirmed the mark on all four sides. The button latch never read set
|
||||||
|
while the laser latch was unlocked, the supply dipped across the two second
|
||||||
|
dwell and came back lit for the third side, and the job disarmed a tenth of a
|
||||||
|
second after Idle on the program end.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The rest went through without a stop: fifty-six of fifty-six, nothing skipped.
|
||||||
|
`laser.armed-kill` took the controller down mid-fire twice, with emission at
|
||||||
|
zero about two seconds after each, the latch relocked and the controller
|
||||||
|
respawned. `laser.disarm-in-hold` held the window open in feed hold for 60.7 s
|
||||||
|
and then disarmed on the grace. `cooling.flow-under-load` judged its rise with
|
||||||
|
the tube lit through the window. The cloud four passed, including the
|
||||||
|
operator's own judgement that the app's progress advanced as it cut.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The bench fixture dropped off the network in the middle of the attended set,
|
||||||
|
after the emission witness and before the fourth test, and was not reachable
|
||||||
|
by address or by name from either the machine or the workstation. Its config
|
||||||
|
carries no address, only a hostname resolved by a multicast query the fixture
|
||||||
|
answers itself, so when it stops answering there is no fallback. The operator
|
||||||
|
covered the presses by hand until a power cycle brought it back, and it
|
||||||
|
resumed taking the arm press immediately. Pinning its address in the config
|
||||||
|
would keep a failed name query from hiding it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Reference notes
|
## Reference notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Head-IRQ source validation — the beam-emission hypothesis
|
### Head-IRQ source validation — the beam-emission hypothesis
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user