fa04f450fb
FV could not reach any site but Anaheim. The cause was a single outbound-NAT rule on the FV gateway, added 2026-09-13 and scoped to Anaheim only -- docs/runbooks/fv-to-ana-nat.md says so in as many words: "Other remote sites remain outside this fix's scope." Three mirrors added, same interface and source, only the destination differing: 10.100.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/16 and 10.6.110.0/24. After: fv-ml1 reaches NH3, ESH, Anaheim, Irvine, the mesh and the internet. Regression sweep clean across nh3-dev, nh3-docker and esh-docker-vm. The runbook now records what the failure looks like, because it presents as a routing or Tailscale fault and is neither. fv-ml1 reached mesh addresses perfectly and LAN addresses not at all; the FV firewall log showed the outbound passing with src=10.251.50.54 and no reply returning; temporary counting rules proved nh3-scale received 5 packets and sent 4 replies; both peers' AllowedIPs were correct. The discriminator that settles it is that every other site pair works -- nh3-docker to esh/ana/FV and esh-docker-vm to FV all succeed -- so a general subnet-to-subnet limitation is ruled out and only outbound SNAT is left. Also reverts the remote-site MASQUERADE rules added to nh3-scale earlier on the asymmetric-return theory. They fired but were not the fix, so they are removed rather than left to accumulate as NAT that achieves nothing. Applied via source_nat/add_rule + apply with a pre-change config backup taken first. Source scope is still fv-ml1's /32, so a second FV host will hit this again -- flagged in the runbook.
docs/
Navigation map for the documentation tree. New session? Read
orientation.md first — it's the narrative overview
of the fleet, backup architecture, governing principles, and gotchas,
and it points at everything else.
Tree
docs/
├── orientation.md # start here — fleet overview + where-to-look guide
├── runbooks/ # ops runbooks (recovery, deployment phases)
│ ├── disaster-recovery.md
│ ├── nh3-prune-ritual.md
│ └── pbs-deployment.md
└── pfi/ # PFI-specific reference (services, models, VMs)
├── docker-stack.md
├── model-list.md
├── proxmox-vms.md
├── recommended-model-settings.md
├── vm-102-matrix-appservice.md
└── vm-102-matrix-synapse.md
What goes where
runbooks/— step-by-step ops procedures. Anything you'd reach for during an incident or while standing up new infrastructure. Examples: disaster recovery (blast-radius tiers + restoration steps), PBS deployment (9-phase rollout). New runbook → new file here.pfi/— PFI-specific reference material that's too narrow for the top-level CLAUDE.md but doesn't change incident response. AI model inventory, recommended inference settings, Matrix bridge config, Proxmox VM map. New stable reference → new file here.- Top-level (
docs/orientation.md,docs/README.md) — narrative guides about the workspace itself, not about specific infra.
Cross-references
- Fleet topology + servers table: top-level
CLAUDE.md. - Open work + recent milestones: top-level
STATUS.md. - Durable cross-session facts:
~/.claude/projects/-home-lkraven-development-eshpfi-management/memory/.
Conventions
- Markdown, GitHub-flavored. CommonMark renders fine in most viewers.
- File names are lowercase-kebab-case, descriptive. No dates in filenames — git history covers that.
- One topic per file. If a file grows past ~500 lines, look for a natural split before adding more.
- No checked-in binaries or checksums. Build/release artifacts belong
in a build pipeline or
tools/, notdocs/.