Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/docs
vh fa04f450fb fix(fv): extend the Tailscale SNAT rule to NH3, ESH and Irvine
FV could not reach any site but Anaheim. The cause was a single outbound-NAT
rule on the FV gateway, added 2026-09-13 and scoped to Anaheim only --
docs/runbooks/fv-to-ana-nat.md says so in as many words: "Other remote sites
remain outside this fix's scope." Three mirrors added, same interface and
source, only the destination differing: 10.100.0.0/16, 10.0.0.0/16 and
10.6.110.0/24.

After: fv-ml1 reaches NH3, ESH, Anaheim, Irvine, the mesh and the internet.
Regression sweep clean across nh3-dev, nh3-docker and esh-docker-vm.

The runbook now records what the failure looks like, because it presents as a
routing or Tailscale fault and is neither. fv-ml1 reached mesh addresses
perfectly and LAN addresses not at all; the FV firewall log showed the outbound
passing with src=10.251.50.54 and no reply returning; temporary counting rules
proved nh3-scale received 5 packets and sent 4 replies; both peers' AllowedIPs
were correct. The discriminator that settles it is that every other site pair
works -- nh3-docker to esh/ana/FV and esh-docker-vm to FV all succeed -- so a
general subnet-to-subnet limitation is ruled out and only outbound SNAT is
left.

Also reverts the remote-site MASQUERADE rules added to nh3-scale earlier on the
asymmetric-return theory. They fired but were not the fix, so they are removed
rather than left to accumulate as NAT that achieves nothing.

Applied via source_nat/add_rule + apply with a pre-change config backup taken
first. Source scope is still fv-ml1's /32, so a second FV host will hit this
again -- flagged in the runbook.
2026-09-15 00:40:28 -07:00
..

docs/

Navigation map for the documentation tree. New session? Read orientation.md first — it's the narrative overview of the fleet, backup architecture, governing principles, and gotchas, and it points at everything else.

Tree

docs/
├── orientation.md            # start here — fleet overview + where-to-look guide
├── runbooks/                 # ops runbooks (recovery, deployment phases)
│   ├── disaster-recovery.md
│   ├── nh3-prune-ritual.md
│   └── pbs-deployment.md
└── pfi/                      # PFI-specific reference (services, models, VMs)
    ├── docker-stack.md
    ├── model-list.md
    ├── proxmox-vms.md
    ├── recommended-model-settings.md
    ├── vm-102-matrix-appservice.md
    └── vm-102-matrix-synapse.md

What goes where

  • runbooks/ — step-by-step ops procedures. Anything you'd reach for during an incident or while standing up new infrastructure. Examples: disaster recovery (blast-radius tiers + restoration steps), PBS deployment (9-phase rollout). New runbook → new file here.
  • pfi/ — PFI-specific reference material that's too narrow for the top-level CLAUDE.md but doesn't change incident response. AI model inventory, recommended inference settings, Matrix bridge config, Proxmox VM map. New stable reference → new file here.
  • Top-level (docs/orientation.md, docs/README.md) — narrative guides about the workspace itself, not about specific infra.

Cross-references

  • Fleet topology + servers table: top-level CLAUDE.md.
  • Open work + recent milestones: top-level STATUS.md.
  • Durable cross-session facts: ~/.claude/projects/-home-lkraven-development-eshpfi-management/memory/.

Conventions

  • Markdown, GitHub-flavored. CommonMark renders fine in most viewers.
  • File names are lowercase-kebab-case, descriptive. No dates in filenames — git history covers that.
  • One topic per file. If a file grows past ~500 lines, look for a natural split before adding more.
  • No checked-in binaries or checksums. Build/release artifacts belong in a build pipeline or tools/, not docs/.