Operator ruling: "he's a great writer because of his research, not because he has a strong
identifiable voice."
That reason is about the AUTHOR rather than the data, and it is the better of the two on the
table -- the other being the unmeasurable fraction of quoted material. It also names a
selection criterion this line did not have: ask whether there IS a voice worth adapting
before investigating whether a clean corpus can be built. That question was never asked here.
I surveyed the holdings, built the corpus, measured all fifteen containment pairs, and fixed
three stripping defects the name guard caught -- all real work, none of it touching the thing
that decided it.
A voice adapter is worth its corpus-plus-training-plus-gate only when the target has a prose
signature a reader could pick out blind. McCarthy: 0.0 quote marks per 10k against Hemingway's
838. Hemingway: spare declaratives, heavy unattributed dialogue. Brontë: periodic sentences
built on semicolons and dashes. If that sentence is hard to write, the author is a park.
Nothing is deleted. The corpus (126 units, 422,880 words) and the builder stay committed and
re-runnable; the park entry records what exists, what was never started (D2), and what would
unpark it -- a re-extraction preserving indentation and italics, which would fix the quoted-
material problem but not the operator's objection. The builder's own docstring now carries a
stop notice so a future session finds the reason at the artifact rather than only in memory.
vh
82aa0b6d76