Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/docs
vh dec4ba45db docs: scope the NAT refutation to WireGuard; IPsec to colo is broken
Correcting an over-generalisation from earlier today. Proving that NAT
does not break Site Magic, I wrote it up as "no addressing outcome
threatens the inter-site tunnel." That is wrong: the fleet has two
inter-site links with opposite NAT behaviour.

- NH3<->ESH is Site Magic, i.e. WireGuard. It survives arbitrary NAT,
  proven live on RFC1918 double-NAT (192.168.200.111) with nh3-dev and
  nh3-docker reachable at ~40ms. It dials out to NH3's public edge and
  never needs inbound reachability.

- colo<->ESH is IPsec on the ana-gw FortiGate, and it is broken right
  now under those same conditions. ana-docker, pfi-pve and pbs-ana all
  fail from esh-pve-nas, and traceroute shows packets for 10.250.x
  leaving the UDM to the 5G modem and then wandering the carrier network
  before dying -- not encapsulated at all, so no SA is up and the
  traffic falls through to the default route. Site-to-site IPsec pins a
  peer IP and ESH no longer has a routable one.

So the IPv6 work keeps its justification, but on the IPsec link
specifically rather than on the tunnels generally. Operator caught the
over-generalisation.

Adds lesson 8 -- a result proven for one protocol does not transfer to
another -- and corrects the superseded-claims row rather than replacing
it, since the original claim was half right and the halves are the
point. Also records my own over-broad claim as its own superseded row.
2026-08-18 07:47:10 -07:00
..

docs/

Navigation map for the documentation tree. New session? Read orientation.md first — it's the narrative overview of the fleet, backup architecture, governing principles, and gotchas, and it points at everything else.

Tree

docs/
├── orientation.md            # start here — fleet overview + where-to-look guide
├── runbooks/                 # ops runbooks (recovery, deployment phases)
│   ├── disaster-recovery.md
│   ├── nh3-prune-ritual.md
│   └── pbs-deployment.md
└── pfi/                      # PFI-specific reference (services, models, VMs)
    ├── docker-stack.md
    ├── model-list.md
    ├── proxmox-vms.md
    ├── recommended-model-settings.md
    ├── vm-102-matrix-appservice.md
    └── vm-102-matrix-synapse.md

What goes where

  • runbooks/ — step-by-step ops procedures. Anything you'd reach for during an incident or while standing up new infrastructure. Examples: disaster recovery (blast-radius tiers + restoration steps), PBS deployment (9-phase rollout). New runbook → new file here.
  • pfi/ — PFI-specific reference material that's too narrow for the top-level CLAUDE.md but doesn't change incident response. AI model inventory, recommended inference settings, Matrix bridge config, Proxmox VM map. New stable reference → new file here.
  • Top-level (docs/orientation.md, docs/README.md) — narrative guides about the workspace itself, not about specific infra.

Cross-references

  • Fleet topology + servers table: top-level CLAUDE.md.
  • Open work + recent milestones: top-level STATUS.md.
  • Durable cross-session facts: ~/.claude/projects/-home-lkraven-development-eshpfi-management/memory/.

Conventions

  • Markdown, GitHub-flavored. CommonMark renders fine in most viewers.
  • File names are lowercase-kebab-case, descriptive. No dates in filenames — git history covers that.
  • One topic per file. If a file grows past ~500 lines, look for a natural split before adding more.
  • No checked-in binaries or checksums. Build/release artifacts belong in a build pipeline or tools/, not docs/.