Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/scripts/yarros-corpus/build_sft_pairs.py
T
vh 533cc0ce81 build_sft_pairs: reject beats that name characters the rename removed
A leak the corpus gate structurally cannot see, found on lv-bronte.

The rename strips the author's names from the prose and leak_gate.py proves
they are gone — 0 of 365 surviving on Brontë, both controls green. But the beat
is written by an LLM that READ THE PASSAGE, and if it recognises the book it
supplies the canonical names out of its own training. The beat is the
INSTRUCTION half of the pair, so training on it re-teaches exactly the
inventions the rename pipeline exists to remove, and the gate never looks at it:
the gate reads the corpus and the renamed copies, never the generated beats.

MEASURED on the first 714 Brontë pairs, before the filter existed:
  13 beats (1.8%) named source characters — Rochester x6, Jane x3,
  Brocklehurst x2, Beck, Fairfax, Helen, Burns, Eyre, Reed, Rivers
  0 of 714 RESPONSES did. The rename was perfect; the instruction side was not.
One beat read "Saoirse confirms Rochester's flaws, then agrees in English to
marry him" — a renamed name and a canonical one in the same sentence, which is
the mechanism in miniature.

Exposure scales with how well the generator knows the book, so it is WORST for
public-domain classics and mildest for recent work. That is exactly why the
Yarros and Hemingway runs came up clean and Brontë did not — their clean runs
are NOT evidence this cannot happen to them, and both should be rebuilt with
--source-entities if they are ever regenerated.

Adds a `sourcename` reject to vet() plus --source-entities, which takes the
UNRENAMED entity map and refuses any beat naming a surface from it. Firing at
roughly 3% of attempts on Brontë.

Also adds a `bronte` register. Brontë is the far end of the same axis from
Hemingway and the register has to say so, or the beat-writer produces modern
summary prose the passages never match.
2026-09-16 21:02:49 -07:00

491 lines
27 KiB
Python
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
"""BabyYarros Option C — build instruction→response SFT pairs from the gated corpus.
The architecture question was settled on 2026-09-11: the adapted completion carrier has
the voice and cannot take direction; the instruct model takes direction and has no voice.
Skaldsong needs both, which means the corpus has to be rebuilt as instruction→response
pairs and trained through the chat template rather than as raw continuation text.
⭐ THE PROPERTY THAT MAKES THIS SAFE: the model writes the INSTRUCTION, never the
RESPONSE. Every response is real (renamed) Yarros prose, so the voice is inherited from
the corpus and not synthesised. Only the beat is machine-made, and a beat is a summary —
the easiest job in the building. A pipeline that generated the prose would be training
the carrier on a 27B's pastiche of Yarros, which is the opposite of the point.
⚠ PASSAGES, NOT PARAGRAPHS. Measured on copy0: the median Yarros paragraph is 39 words
(p90 67) against the product's 90-140 band, so one paragraph is nowhere near one product
output. Accumulating consecutive paragraphs to the band gives 6,992 passages at median
104 words / 4 paragraphs — in-band by construction, and multi-paragraph, which is also
the continuity requirement the stitching failure raised (independently-generated
paragraphs drift in POV; the pair corpus has to contain multi-paragraph examples).
⚠ ONE COPY ONLY. The rename produced 6 copies under different name maps. Six copies of
the same passage would be six near-duplicate responses differing only in proper nouns,
which is corpus inflation, not augmentation, at pair-training scale.
⚠ TRAIN SPLIT ONLY. The val split stays untouched so held-out loss remains comparable to
the raw-text arms.
Generator is the local `gen` seat: free, and abliterated, which matters here for a
non-obvious reason — the corpus contains sex and violence, and a refusing generator would
silently drop exactly the passages where the voice is most distinctive, biasing the
dataset toward its tamest regions. A refusal is a sampling bias, not just a gap.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse, json, random, re, sys, time, urllib.error, urllib.request
from pathlib import Path
GATEWAY = "http://10.250.50.70:4000"
# Matches gen_beats_chat_yarros.py verbatim so the pairs are trained in the SAME shape the
# evaluation harness measures. A pair corpus trained under a different system prompt than
# the eval drives would confound the carrier change with a prompt change.
# ⚠ DEFECT 1 of the BabyYarros pair build: the system prompt said "ONE paragraph" while every
# response was a MEDIAN OF FOUR. The carrier believed the data, correctly, and then looked
# broken against a harness that truncated at the first blank line. The prompt now describes
# what the response actually is. Both are kept: `SYS` is frozen so the shipped BabyYarros
# adapter can still be reproduced and re-evaluated under the prompt it was trained on.
SYS = ("You expand a single story beat into ONE paragraph of prose in the manner of Rebecca "
"Yarros — contemporary first-person PRESENT-tense narration, emotionally charged, sensory "
"and physical, the voice of new-adult romantasy. Render the beat itself; do not move past "
"it, do not add a new scene, do not comment. Output the paragraph only, 90–140 words.")
SYS_PASSAGE = ("You expand a single story beat into a SHORT PASSAGE of prose in the manner of "
"{author} — {register}. The passage may run to several paragraphs and should read "
"as continuous scene, not a summary. Render the beat itself; do not move past it, "
"do not begin a new scene, do not comment, do not write a chapter heading. Output "
"the prose only, 90–140 words.")
REGISTERS = {
"yarros": ("Rebecca Yarros", "contemporary first-person PRESENT-tense narration, emotionally "
"charged, sensory and physical, the voice of new-adult romantasy"),
"hemingway": ("Ernest Hemingway", "spare declarative sentences, concrete physical detail, "
"heavy unattributed dialogue, feeling shown through action and omission rather "
"than stated"),
# Brontë is the far end of the same axis from Hemingway, and the register has to say
# so or the beat-writer produces modern summary prose that the passages never match:
# long periodic sentences, an explicitly retrospective first person, and moral
# weather carried in the landscape rather than in the dialogue.
"bronte": ("Charlotte Brontë", "mid-nineteenth-century first-person retrospective narration, "
"long periodic sentences built on semicolons and dashes, heightened interior "
"analysis and moral reflection, occasional direct address to the reader, and "
"physical setting — Yorkshire weather, schoolrooms, Belgian pensionnats — "
"rendered with the feeling it carries"),
}
CONTEXT_BLOCK = """The passage is preceded by this, for reference only. Do NOT write a beat for it — it is
here so you resolve names and pronouns correctly.
PRECEDING:
{prev}
"""
BEAT_PROMPT = """{context}Below is a passage from a novel. Write the single story BEAT that a writer would have been given to produce it.
Rules:
- ONE sentence, 8 to 30 words, present tense, third person.
- Name the characters who appear, using the names exactly as the passage spells them.
- The passage is first-person and its narrator is usually UNNAMED in it. Call that person
"she" or "he" as the passage implies. Never write "the narrator", "the speaker" or "I".
- State WHAT HAPPENS — the action, the turn, the decision, the reveal. Not how it is written.
- Do NOT describe the passage ("this excerpt shows..."), do NOT mention prose, style, tone or the author.
- Do NOT reuse distinctive phrases from the passage. Say the event in your own plain words.
- Output the sentence alone, with no label, no quotes and no preamble.
PASSAGE:
{passage}"""
ABBREV = re.compile(r"\b(Mr|Mrs|Ms|Dr|St|Sr|Jr|Lt|Col|Gen|Capt|Sgt|Prof|vs|etc|No)\.$")
META = re.compile(r"\b(passage|excerpt|paragraph|prose|narrat(?:or|ion)|the (?:author|text|scene) (?:is|describes)|this (?:scene|chapter))\b", re.I)
# ⚠ MEASURED, and it was a composition bias rather than a nuisance: of 23 `meta` rejects in
# a 150-passage diagnostic, **22 were the single word "narrator"** and 1 was the story-word
# "passage". Those beats were otherwise clean ("Miguel shouts a warning as the venin
# advances, while the dark wielder taunts the narrator..."). The model reaches for "the
# narrator" precisely when the POV character is an ACTOR, so rejecting on it silently drops
# action scenes and keeps the ones where she only observes -- a systematic skew in what the
# carrier would learn to render, invisible in any spot-read of the kept pairs. The fix is a
# single bounded RETRY with the correction restated, not a substitution: the generator knows
# the character's gender from the prose and this session does not, and guessing it wrong
# across 780k words of first-person narration is the worse failure.
NARRATOR_ONLY = re.compile(r"\bnarrat(?:or|ion)\b", re.I)
RETRY_NOTE = ("\n\nYour previous answer used the word \"narrator\". Rewrite it referring to that "
"person as \"she\" or \"he\" — whichever the passage implies — and change nothing else.")
def ctx_block(prev: str | None) -> str:
"""The beat generator sees the PRECEDING passage even when the pair will not carry it.
Found in the positive control: passage [4] of nova ch16 is genuinely ambiguous about
who is buried and who is digging, and the hand beat and the model beat disagreed for
exactly that reason. A mid-scene passage can underdetermine its own referents; showing
the generator the previous passage fixes the pronouns without putting anything in the
instruction that the response does not support.
"""
return CONTEXT_BLOCK.format(prev=prev) if prev else ""
def post(path: str, payload: dict, key: str, timeout: int = 120) -> dict:
req = urllib.request.Request(
GATEWAY + path, data=json.dumps(payload).encode(),
headers={"Content-Type": "application/json", "Authorization": f"Bearer {key}"})
with urllib.request.urlopen(req, timeout=timeout) as r:
return json.loads(r.read())
HEADING_MAX_WORDS = 6
def drop_leading_heading(paras: list[str], enabled: bool) -> list[str]:
"""Drop a unit's opening block when it is a bare chapter heading.
⚠ DEFECT 3 of the BabyYarros pair build, and it is far worse on Hemingway: 20 of 600
Yarros responses carried a chapter heading (3.3%), but **315 of 318 Hemingway units open
with one** because these editions set `I`, `27` or a story title on its own line. The
corpus builder KEEPS those headings deliberately -- they are part of the form the voice
lives in and dropping them would teach the model that chapters begin mid-scene -- so the
removal belongs here, at pair construction, not upstream in the corpus.
A response beginning `CHAPTER SIXTY-SIX` teaches the carrier to emit chapter headings when
asked for prose, which is exactly what the pilot adapter did.
"""
if not enabled or not paras:
return paras
return paras[1:] if len(paras[0].split()) <= HEADING_MAX_WORDS else paras
def chunk(corpus: Path, lo: int, hi: int, split: str, drop_heading: bool = False) -> list[dict]:
"""Accumulate consecutive paragraphs into product-band passages, per chapter.
Chapter-bounded so a passage never straddles a chapter break. The trailing buffer of
each chapter is DROPPED rather than emitted short -- an out-of-band response would
teach the length the product is trying to hold.
"""
out = []
for f in sorted(corpus.glob("*.copy0.jsonl")):
for line in f.read_text(encoding="utf-8").splitlines():
d = json.loads(line)
if d.get("split") != split:
continue
paras = [p.strip() for p in re.split(r"\n\s*\n", d["text"]) if p.strip()]
paras = drop_leading_heading(paras, drop_heading)
buf, n, prev = [], 0, None
for p in paras:
buf.append(p); n += len(p.split())
if n >= lo:
if n <= int(hi * 1.6):
out.append({"work": d["work"], "chapter": d["chapter"], "split": d["split"],
"response": "\n\n".join(buf), "words": n, "prev": prev})
prev = "\n\n".join(buf)
else:
prev = None # oversized run dropped; context would be a lie
buf, n = [], 0
return out
def ngrams(text: str, n: int) -> set[str]:
w = re.findall(r"[a-z']+", text.lower())
return {" ".join(w[i:i + n]) for i in range(max(0, len(w) - n + 1))}
def vet(beat: str, passage: str, overlap_n: int,
source_pat: "re.Pattern[str] | None" = None) -> tuple[str | None, str]:
"""Return (clean_beat, reason). reason is '' on accept.
Every rejection is a dataset defect that would otherwise train silently:
echo -- a beat quoting the passage teaches the model to copy its instruction
back, not to expand it. This is the one that would look fine in a
spot-read and poison the whole run.
meta -- 'this passage shows...' is a description of text, not a story beat
length -- a 60-word beat is a summary; a 4-word beat is a title
sourcename -- ⭐ the beat names a character the RENAME removed. See below.
⚠⭐ `sourcename` IS A LEAK THE CORPUS GATE STRUCTURALLY CANNOT SEE, and it was found
on lv-bronte (2026-09-16). The rename strips the author's names from the prose and
leak_gate.py proves they are gone — but the beat is written by an LLM that READ THE
PASSAGE, and if it recognises the book it supplies the canonical names from its own
training. Measured on Brontë: 13 of the first 714 beats (1.8%) named Rochester (x6),
Jane (x3), Brocklehurst (x2), Beck, Fairfax, Helen, Burns, Eyre, Reed and Rivers,
while 0 of 714 RESPONSES did — the rename was perfect and the instruction side was
not. One beat read `Saoirse confirms Rochester's flaws`, mixing a renamed name and a
canonical one in a single sentence, which is the mechanism in miniature.
The beat is the INSTRUCTION half of the pair, so training on it re-teaches exactly the
inventions the rename pipeline exists to remove, and the corpus gate never looks at it:
the gate reads the corpus and the renamed copies, never the generated beats.
⚠ Exposure scales with how well the generator knows the book, so it is WORST for
public-domain classics and mildest for recent work — which is precisely why Yarros and
Hemingway did not surface it and Brontë did. Do not read their clean runs as evidence
this cannot happen; pass --source-entities on every corpus.
"""
beat = " ".join(beat.strip().split())
beat = re.sub(r'^(?:beat|answer)\s*[:\-]\s*', '', beat, flags=re.I).strip().strip('"“”')
if not beat:
return None, "empty"
# First sentence only -- the model sometimes adds a second.
# ⚠ An abbreviation is not a sentence end. The naive `.+?[.!?]\s` truncated
# "Jeremias arrives with Mr. Derrick and he sizes him up" to "...with Mr." -- caught in the
# Hemingway positive control, and it would have been near-invisible in the built pairs
# because the result is still a short grammatical-looking fragment. Hemingway is full of
# `Mr. Singh`, `Mr. Bobby`, `Mr. Derrick`, so this fires constantly on this corpus and
# essentially never on Yarros -- a defect one corpus exposes and another hides.
m = re.match(r"^(.+?[.!?])(?:\s|$)", beat)
while m and ABBREV.search(m.group(1)):
nxt = re.match(r"^(.+?[.!?])(?:\s|$)", beat[m.end():])
if not nxt:
m = None
break
m = re.match(r"^(.{%d,}?[.!?])(?:\s|$)" % (m.end() + 1), beat)
if not m:
break
if m:
beat = m.group(1).strip()
nw = len(beat.split())
if nw < 6 or nw > 34:
return None, f"length({nw})"
if META.search(beat):
return None, "meta"
if ngrams(beat, overlap_n) & ngrams(passage, overlap_n):
return None, f"echo({overlap_n}gram)"
if source_pat is not None:
m = source_pat.search(beat)
if m:
return None, f"sourcename({m.group(1)})"
return beat, ""
NAME = re.compile(r"(?<![.!?“\"]\s)(?<!^)\b([A-Z][a-z]{2,})\b")
def names_not_in_response(beat: str, response: str) -> list[str]:
"""Names the BEAT introduces that the RESPONSE never spells out.
Reported, deliberately NOT rejected. Giving the generator the preceding passage fixed
the referent ambiguity the positive control exposed -- it corrected a hand-written beat
that had the buried and the digging characters backwards -- but it also lets a beat name
someone who appears only in that preceding text. Rejecting on this would drop exactly the
passages whose POV character is unnamed, which is a sampling bias dressed as a guard
(same argument as the refusing-generator note above). So it is counted and surfaced in
provenance, and the rate decides whether it needs a rule.
"""
return sorted({n for n in NAME.findall(beat) if n not in response})
def main() -> int:
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--corpus", required=True, help="dir holding *.copy0.jsonl")
ap.add_argument("--out", required=True)
ap.add_argument("--key-file", default=None, help="file holding the gateway key")
ap.add_argument("--key", default=None)
ap.add_argument("--model", default="gen")
ap.add_argument("--n", type=int, default=600)
ap.add_argument("--lo", type=int, default=90)
ap.add_argument("--hi", type=int, default=150)
ap.add_argument("--split", default="train")
ap.add_argument("--seed", type=int, default=4919)
# ⚠ DEFECT 2 of the BabyYarros pair build, and the one that shaped its output most.
# The chunker starts each passage where the last one ended, so a passage opens MID-SCENE
# with lead-in the beat does not describe -- the beat summarises the whole span. At 0.4 the
# pair usually withheld the preceding text, so the carrier learned "open somewhere
# unrelated, then drift toward the beat", which is exactly what the pilot generations did:
# the beat material landed in block 3 or 4.
# Setting this to 1.0 motivates the opening instead of hiding it, and it matches how
# Skaldsong actually calls the model -- a stitcher always has the previous passage. A
# passage at the START of a unit has no predecessor and stays a genuine cold open, which is
# correct: a chapter's first passage IS one, and its beat legitimately describes its start.
ap.add_argument("--context-frac", type=float, default=0.4,
help="fraction of pairs carrying the preceding passage as context; "
"use 1.0 for the corrected recipe (see DEFECT 2)")
ap.add_argument("--overlap-n", type=int, default=6)
ap.add_argument("--source-entities", default=None,
help="entities json for the UNRENAMED source. Any beat naming a surface "
"from it is rejected as `sourcename`. Pass this on every corpus: the "
"generator reads the passage and will supply canonical names from its "
"own memory of the book if it recognises it, which the corpus leak "
"gate cannot see because it never reads the generated beats.")
ap.add_argument("--register", choices=sorted(REGISTERS), default=None,
help="DEFECT 1 fix: emit the PASSAGE system prompt for this author instead "
"of the frozen one-paragraph Yarros prompt. Omit to keep the original.")
ap.add_argument("--temperature", type=float, default=0.3)
ap.add_argument("--control-out", default=None,
help="write the first --control-n passages out for hand-written beats")
ap.add_argument("--control-n", type=int, default=10)
ap.add_argument("--dump-passages", action="store_true", help="chunk and report, generate nothing")
ap.add_argument("--drop-leading-heading", action="store_true",
help="DEFECT 3 fix: drop a unit's opening block when it is a bare chapter "
"heading. OFF by default so the BabyYarros pair set stays byte-reproducible.")
ap.add_argument("--control-in", default=None,
help="JSON of hand-written beats [{idx,beat}]; generate beats for the SAME "
"passages and print side by side. The positive control -- a beat "
"generator nobody checked against a human can produce a clean-looking "
"dataset that teaches the wrong mapping, and nothing downstream would show it.")
a = ap.parse_args()
sys_prompt = SYS
if a.register:
author, register = REGISTERS[a.register]
sys_prompt = SYS_PASSAGE.format(author=author, register=register)
key = a.key or (Path(a.key_file).read_text().strip() if a.key_file else None)
passages = chunk(Path(a.corpus), a.lo, a.hi, a.split, a.drop_leading_heading)
print(f"[chunk] {len(passages)} passages in split={a.split}, band {a.lo}-{a.hi}", flush=True)
if not passages:
print("REFUSING: no passages -- wrong corpus dir or split", file=sys.stderr)
return 2
random.seed(a.seed)
random.shuffle(passages)
if a.control_out:
ctl = [{"idx": i, "work": p["work"], "chapter": p["chapter"], "response": p["response"],
"beat_handwritten": ""} for i, p in enumerate(passages[:a.control_n])]
Path(a.control_out).write_text(json.dumps(ctl, indent=2, ensure_ascii=False), encoding="utf-8")
print(f"[control] wrote {len(ctl)} passages to {a.control_out} for hand-written beats")
if a.dump_passages:
return 0
if not key:
print("REFUSING: no gateway key (--key or --key-file)", file=sys.stderr)
return 2
# The alias is not the model. `gen` has pointed at different concrete backends over
# time; counting by an alias once inflated an exposure figure 4.7x on this fleet. The
# build fingerprint is resolved at START and again at END and both go in provenance --
# a seat repointed mid-run would otherwise be invisible in the artefact.
def fingerprint() -> str:
try:
r = post("/v1/chat/completions", {"model": a.model, "max_tokens": 1,
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "ok"}]}, key, 60)
return r.get("system_fingerprint") or "unknown"
except Exception as e:
return f"unresolved:{e}"
fp_start = fingerprint()
print(f"[seat] {a.model} fingerprint at start: {fp_start}", flush=True)
if a.control_in:
hand = {h["idx"]: h["beat"] for h in json.loads(Path(a.control_in).read_text(encoding="utf-8"))}
agree = 0
for i in sorted(hand):
psg = passages[i]
r = post("/v1/chat/completions", {
"model": a.model, "temperature": a.temperature, "max_tokens": 80,
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": BEAT_PROMPT.format(passage=psg["response"], context=ctx_block(psg["prev"]))}],
}, key)
beat, why = vet(r["choices"][0]["message"]["content"] or "", psg["response"], a.overlap_n)
print("=" * 72)
print(f"[{i}] {psg['work']} ch{psg['chapter']}")
print(f" HAND : {hand[i]}")
print(f" MODEL: {beat if beat else '<<REJECTED: ' + why + '>>'}")
if beat:
agree += 1
print("=" * 72)
print(f"[control] {agree}/{len(hand)} model beats passed the guards; "
f"judge the EVENT match by reading, not by this count")
return 0
out_path = Path(a.out)
source_pat = None
if a.source_entities:
_e = json.loads(Path(a.source_entities).read_text())
_surf = sorted({(v.get("surface") or k)
for w in _e.values() for k, v in w["entities"].items()
if "\u2019" not in k and "'" not in k},
key=len, reverse=True)
if _surf:
source_pat = re.compile(r"\b(" + "|".join(re.escape(x) for x in _surf) + r")\b")
print(f" source-entity filter: {len(_surf)} surfaces the beat may not name")
rejects: dict[str, int] = {}
kept = 0
name_drift = 0
retried = 0
retry_saved = 0
drift_examples: list[dict] = []
t0 = time.time()
with out_path.open("w", encoding="utf-8") as fh:
for p in passages:
if kept >= a.n:
break
try:
r = post("/v1/chat/completions", {
"model": a.model, "temperature": a.temperature, "max_tokens": 80,
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": BEAT_PROMPT.format(passage=p["response"], context=ctx_block(p["prev"]))}],
}, key)
raw = r["choices"][0]["message"]["content"] or ""
except (urllib.error.URLError, urllib.error.HTTPError, KeyError, TimeoutError) as e:
rejects["transport"] = rejects.get("transport", 0) + 1
print(f"[warn] {type(e).__name__}: {e}", flush=True)
continue
beat, why = vet(raw, p["response"], a.overlap_n, source_pat)
if beat is None and why == "meta" and NARRATOR_ONLY.search(raw):
retried += 1
try:
r2 = post("/v1/chat/completions", {
"model": a.model, "temperature": a.temperature, "max_tokens": 80,
"messages": [
{"role": "user", "content": BEAT_PROMPT.format(
passage=p["response"], context=ctx_block(p["prev"]))},
{"role": "assistant", "content": raw},
{"role": "user", "content": RETRY_NOTE.strip()},
]}, key)
beat, why = vet(r2["choices"][0]["message"]["content"] or "",
p["response"], a.overlap_n, source_pat)
if beat is not None:
retry_saved += 1
except (urllib.error.URLError, urllib.error.HTTPError, KeyError, TimeoutError):
pass
if beat is None:
rejects[why.split("(")[0]] = rejects.get(why.split("(")[0], 0) + 1
continue
drift = names_not_in_response(beat, p["response"])
if drift:
name_drift += 1
drift_examples.append({"beat": beat, "names": drift})
use_ctx = p["prev"] is not None and random.random() < a.context_frac
fh.write(json.dumps({
"work": p["work"], "chapter": p["chapter"], "split": p["split"],
"beat": beat, "context": p["prev"] if use_ctx else None,
"response": p["response"], "words": p["words"],
}, ensure_ascii=False) + "\n")
kept += 1
if kept % 50 == 0:
print(f"[gen] {kept}/{a.n} {time.time()-t0:.0f}s rejects={rejects}", flush=True)
fp_end = fingerprint()
prov = {
"generated_at": time.strftime("%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%z"),
"generator_model_alias": a.model,
"generator_fingerprint_start": fp_start,
"generator_fingerprint_end": fp_end,
"generator_repointed_midrun": fp_start != fp_end,
"gateway": GATEWAY, "temperature": a.temperature,
"corpus": str(a.corpus), "split": a.split, "copy": "copy0",
"band_words": [a.lo, a.hi], "seed": a.seed, "context_frac": a.context_frac,
"overlap_guard_n": a.overlap_n,
"passages_available": len(passages), "pairs_kept": kept, "rejects": rejects,
"narrator_retries": retried, "narrator_retries_recovered": retry_saved,
"beats_naming_absent_entity": name_drift,
"beats_naming_absent_entity_rate": round(name_drift / max(1, kept), 4),
"beats_naming_absent_entity_examples": drift_examples[:15],
"reject_rate": round(sum(rejects.values()) / max(1, kept + sum(rejects.values())), 4),
"elapsed_s": round(time.time() - t0, 1),
"system_prompt": sys_prompt,
"register": a.register or "yarros-frozen-one-paragraph",
"drop_leading_heading": a.drop_leading_heading,
}
Path(str(out_path) + ".provenance.json").write_text(json.dumps(prov, indent=2), encoding="utf-8")
print(f"[done] {kept} pairs -> {out_path}")
print(f"[done] rejects {rejects} (rate {prov['reject_rate']})")
print(f"[done] narrator-retries {retried}, recovered {retry_saved}")
print(f"[done] beats naming an entity absent from their response: {name_drift}/{kept} "
f"({prov['beats_naming_absent_entity_rate']}) -- reported, not rejected")
if prov["generator_repointed_midrun"]:
print("⚠ SEAT REPOINTED MID-RUN -- the pairs are not from one generator", file=sys.stderr)
return 0
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(main())