Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/docs
vh 94fb7b7208 power: answer the bank-budget question — DCGM has the concept, the dynamic part is a control loop, and 4x250 already is 1000 W
DCGM_CONFIG_POWER_BUDGET_GROUP ('the power budget for the entire group') exists
alongside DCGM_CONFIG_POWER_CAP_INDIVIDUAL, so the concept is first-class. The docs do
not state how a group budget is distributed, and the deduction is that it cannot be
anything exotic: the only enforcement primitive underneath is NVML's per-GPU
nvmlDeviceSetPowerManagementLimit and there is no bank-level register, so any group
budget resolves to N per-GPU writes. Static even division is one write each; 'each card
free until they are all loaded' requires continuous re-writing, which is a control loop
rather than a hardware feature. Worth a ten-minute test when the box returns, in case
NVIDIA already runs that loop.

Records the design constraint that matters more than the logic: power readings lag and
-pl application takes tens of milliseconds, so a reactive daemon overshoots during a load
ramp -- and the ramp is the dangerous moment, being the same all-cards-at-once shape as
this box's ten restart:unless-stopped containers starting together. So any such loop must
be safe-by-default and opportunistic upward: boot at budget/N, only ever raise after
observing idle neighbours. Inverted, it works for weeks and then fails on precisely the
event it existed to prevent.

And the reason to defer it: 4x250 W is already 1000 W, so the static cap is the
conservative floor of the dynamic scheme rather than an alternative. The daemon's entire
contribution is the one-card-busy case, worth perhaps 5% throughput, which is rare for a
serving fleet that puts one seat per card and common only for a training window.
2026-09-13 00:30:58 -07:00
..

docs/

Navigation map for the documentation tree. New session? Read orientation.md first — it's the narrative overview of the fleet, backup architecture, governing principles, and gotchas, and it points at everything else.

Tree

docs/
├── orientation.md            # start here — fleet overview + where-to-look guide
├── runbooks/                 # ops runbooks (recovery, deployment phases)
│   ├── disaster-recovery.md
│   ├── nh3-prune-ritual.md
│   └── pbs-deployment.md
└── pfi/                      # PFI-specific reference (services, models, VMs)
    ├── docker-stack.md
    ├── model-list.md
    ├── proxmox-vms.md
    ├── recommended-model-settings.md
    ├── vm-102-matrix-appservice.md
    └── vm-102-matrix-synapse.md

What goes where

  • runbooks/ — step-by-step ops procedures. Anything you'd reach for during an incident or while standing up new infrastructure. Examples: disaster recovery (blast-radius tiers + restoration steps), PBS deployment (9-phase rollout). New runbook → new file here.
  • pfi/ — PFI-specific reference material that's too narrow for the top-level CLAUDE.md but doesn't change incident response. AI model inventory, recommended inference settings, Matrix bridge config, Proxmox VM map. New stable reference → new file here.
  • Top-level (docs/orientation.md, docs/README.md) — narrative guides about the workspace itself, not about specific infra.

Cross-references

  • Fleet topology + servers table: top-level CLAUDE.md.
  • Open work + recent milestones: top-level STATUS.md.
  • Durable cross-session facts: ~/.claude/projects/-home-lkraven-development-eshpfi-management/memory/.

Conventions

  • Markdown, GitHub-flavored. CommonMark renders fine in most viewers.
  • File names are lowercase-kebab-case, descriptive. No dates in filenames — git history covers that.
  • One topic per file. If a file grows past ~500 lines, look for a natural split before adding more.
  • No checked-in binaries or checksums. Build/release artifacts belong in a build pipeline or tools/, not docs/.