Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/docs/runbooks
vh 87a1cff6de docs(althing): retract the "bare shell" claim — it was never verified
I wrote that Claude Code runs the status line in a bare shell. What I
actually measured was that a HAND-RUN from an interactive session inherits
that session's exported ALTHING_HANDLE; Claude Code's own invocation is a
different execution and was not observed. forseti caught it before the
sentence had been read by anyone else.

The evidence points the other way: this box's Claude Code process carries
ALTHING_HANDLE and ALTHING_POST_OFFICE in its own environ, inherited from
the dev-launch shell, and a spawned child would normally inherit both —
observed independently on two seats. Whether Claude Code scrubs before
spawning was not observed either.

Nothing depends on the answer, which is why the page now says "do not depend
on the environment being present" instead of asserting its absence, and
records it as an open question with both sides. The smoke test still strips
the variables, because that is the harder case and the one whose false pass
caught two agents inside an hour.
2026-09-02 10:14:08 -07:00
..