A version number cannot tell you what a stale plugin cost. 0.0.1 and
0.1.1 differ by two hooks and a script, so the runbook now carries a
check that compares hook lists across cached versions and looks for
pane-route.sh directly.
Also records why this hid for five days, which is the more transferable
half. A missing deploy surface does not present as an error -- it presents
as "the migration needs manual work", and there was a ready explanation
for that, because four of five seats were non-Claude and genuinely did
need hand-holding. The seat that falsified the story was our own: a Claude
Code seat that should have self-declared and did not, and it looked
exactly like the other four. Nobody asked why the automatic path had not
fired on the one seat it was built for.
So: when a migration needs manual intervention, verify the automatic path
was actually deployed before concluding it does not apply to your case.
vh
84349d7a0e