Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/docs
vh 0ab9da5b89 fix(fv): broaden the Tailscale SNAT rules from fv-ml1/32 to the FV LAN /24
All four outbound-NAT rules on the FV gateway now match source
10.251.50.0/24 instead of fv-ml1's single address, so a second host at FV
works on arrival rather than reproducing a failure whose symptoms point at
routing rather than NAT.

Anaheim got a /24 rule of its own through the API. The 2026-09-13 ANA rule was
written with write_config and is invisible to source_nat/search_rule, so
leaving it as the only ANA coverage would have kept one destination on a
different code path from the other three. The legacy /32 rule is now redundant
but harmless -- it NATs identically and first-match wins -- and is noted in the
runbook for deletion from the UI, since it is the one rule the API cannot see.

Descriptions rewritten to name the real scope. Three of them said "fv-ml1 to X"
while covering the whole subnet, and a description that understates a rule's
reach is the same trap as the Anaheim-only scope that caused this.

Verified after: fv-ml1 reaches NH3, nh3-dev, ESH, Anaheim, Irvine, the mesh and
the internet; nh3-dev, esh-docker-vm and ana-docker all reach FV and each
other; the FV BMC remains reachable inbound. Pre-change config backup taken.

Also records that 10.251.250.0/24 (BMC/management) is deliberately NOT covered
-- inbound reachability is what out-of-band recovery needs, but a management
host originating traffic to another site would hit this same wall.
2026-09-15 00:47:00 -07:00
..

docs/

Navigation map for the documentation tree. New session? Read orientation.md first — it's the narrative overview of the fleet, backup architecture, governing principles, and gotchas, and it points at everything else.

Tree

docs/
├── orientation.md            # start here — fleet overview + where-to-look guide
├── runbooks/                 # ops runbooks (recovery, deployment phases)
│   ├── disaster-recovery.md
│   ├── nh3-prune-ritual.md
│   └── pbs-deployment.md
└── pfi/                      # PFI-specific reference (services, models, VMs)
    ├── docker-stack.md
    ├── model-list.md
    ├── proxmox-vms.md
    ├── recommended-model-settings.md
    ├── vm-102-matrix-appservice.md
    └── vm-102-matrix-synapse.md

What goes where

  • runbooks/ — step-by-step ops procedures. Anything you'd reach for during an incident or while standing up new infrastructure. Examples: disaster recovery (blast-radius tiers + restoration steps), PBS deployment (9-phase rollout). New runbook → new file here.
  • pfi/ — PFI-specific reference material that's too narrow for the top-level CLAUDE.md but doesn't change incident response. AI model inventory, recommended inference settings, Matrix bridge config, Proxmox VM map. New stable reference → new file here.
  • Top-level (docs/orientation.md, docs/README.md) — narrative guides about the workspace itself, not about specific infra.

Cross-references

  • Fleet topology + servers table: top-level CLAUDE.md.
  • Open work + recent milestones: top-level STATUS.md.
  • Durable cross-session facts: ~/.claude/projects/-home-lkraven-development-eshpfi-management/memory/.

Conventions

  • Markdown, GitHub-flavored. CommonMark renders fine in most viewers.
  • File names are lowercase-kebab-case, descriptive. No dates in filenames — git history covers that.
  • One topic per file. If a file grows past ~500 lines, look for a natural split before adding more.
  • No checked-in binaries or checksums. Build/release artifacts belong in a build pipeline or tools/, not docs/.