Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/docs
vh 2da0c76d99 correct the hardware: fv-ml1 is 4x Blackwell Max-Q 300W, ana-ml3 is 2x Ada RTX 6000 — and four cards is a breaker problem
Operator clarification, and it separates two boxes I had been conflating. fv-ml1 is
4x Blackwell RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q at 300 W each (Max-Q being the reduced-TGP SKU; the
Workstation Edition is the 600 W part), 391 GB VRAM, deployed and currently dark.
ana-ml3 is 2x Ada Generation RTX 6000 at 300 W, 96 GB VRAM, not yet deployed. The 200 W
cap directive is ana-ml3's.

With the TGP known, the outage stops being a vague 'undersized' and acquires a
mechanism: two Max-Q cards at 300 W is ~600 W of card, plus a host carrying 566 GB of
RAM, drives, fans and PSU conversion loss at perhaps 200-350 W, against an Eaton 1500
VA's real ~900-1200 W. That lands at or just over the rating, which is precisely what
explains a full day of service on one card and failure minutes into the second. The host
term is the only one being guessed; idle-at-the-plug measures it directly.

It also surfaces something that is not a UPS question at all. Four cards at 300 W plus
~300 W of host is ~1500 W against a 15 A circuit's 1440 W continuous derating, so four
cards uncapped is marginal on the breaker with no UPS in the path. Capping therefore
belongs at fv-ml1 as well as ana-ml3, or fv-ml1 needs a 20 A feed -- and worth noting
today's incident only ever had two of the four cards working.

ana-ml3's placement constraints sharpen too: sm_89 has native FP8 but no NVFP4, so the
in-house NVFP4 quants stay at FV, and at 96 GB total it cannot host the Flash-Next seat
at all -- that needs 74 GiB resident on a single card, and the offload moves the n-gram
table rather than the experts.
2026-09-13 00:26:29 -07:00
..

docs/

Navigation map for the documentation tree. New session? Read orientation.md first — it's the narrative overview of the fleet, backup architecture, governing principles, and gotchas, and it points at everything else.

Tree

docs/
├── orientation.md            # start here — fleet overview + where-to-look guide
├── runbooks/                 # ops runbooks (recovery, deployment phases)
│   ├── disaster-recovery.md
│   ├── nh3-prune-ritual.md
│   └── pbs-deployment.md
└── pfi/                      # PFI-specific reference (services, models, VMs)
    ├── docker-stack.md
    ├── model-list.md
    ├── proxmox-vms.md
    ├── recommended-model-settings.md
    ├── vm-102-matrix-appservice.md
    └── vm-102-matrix-synapse.md

What goes where

  • runbooks/ — step-by-step ops procedures. Anything you'd reach for during an incident or while standing up new infrastructure. Examples: disaster recovery (blast-radius tiers + restoration steps), PBS deployment (9-phase rollout). New runbook → new file here.
  • pfi/ — PFI-specific reference material that's too narrow for the top-level CLAUDE.md but doesn't change incident response. AI model inventory, recommended inference settings, Matrix bridge config, Proxmox VM map. New stable reference → new file here.
  • Top-level (docs/orientation.md, docs/README.md) — narrative guides about the workspace itself, not about specific infra.

Cross-references

  • Fleet topology + servers table: top-level CLAUDE.md.
  • Open work + recent milestones: top-level STATUS.md.
  • Durable cross-session facts: ~/.claude/projects/-home-lkraven-development-eshpfi-management/memory/.

Conventions

  • Markdown, GitHub-flavored. CommonMark renders fine in most viewers.
  • File names are lowercase-kebab-case, descriptive. No dates in filenames — git history covers that.
  • One topic per file. If a file grows past ~500 lines, look for a natural split before adding more.
  • No checked-in binaries or checksums. Build/release artifacts belong in a build pipeline or tools/, not docs/.