All four notified seats re-declared within about twelve minutes and the
log went quiet. Five of five pane routes now carry the guard fields, and
delivery is confirmed on a claude seat, a pi seat and a grok seat.
Two findings survive the close-out. The herald's exclusion reason is
false for the migration case -- every declaring process was alive and
four days old with no pid wrap, and the real cause is simply that the
route predates the fields the guard needs. And the uv trap stands as the
thing most likely to bite the next person.
The third is mine. I raised non-Claude pane delivery with forseti as an
open risk on their release when forseti had personally measured it days
earlier, on the exact seats in question, and the resulting matrix is what
characterised the settle bug they fixed. The error was not caution, it
was calling something open without checking whether it was already
settled, with the peers who knew right in front of me. Recorded because
"I don't know" and "this is an open risk" are different claims and I made
the second when only the first was true.
Still open with forseti: the uv --force runbook fix, an exclusion-message
third branch, --discover-pid against a non-Claude process tree, the
one-tick latency note, and status not being durable evidence.
vh
28dd516be1