The three rungs now sit on the same unwrapped corpus, seed, step count and token
count, so carrier size is the only variable. Held-out loss reads 3.329 at 0.6B,
3.018 at 1.7B and 2.814 at 4B -- deltas of 0.311 and then 0.204, diminishing but
still real.
4B answers the question the rung existed for. Scene-level continuity holds: on the
office-kitchen prompt it produces a named character with motivated dialogue, a
spatial layout the narrator navigates, and a physical description, all in one
passage, where 1.7B wrote pretty but eventless prose about opening doors and
looking at stars. On the letter prompt it opens the letter, promises to quote it,
and then quotes it across a paragraph break. Voice saturation is also the best of
any rung: curly quotes 17 of 18 against its own base arm's 1 of 18, and collapse 0
of 18 against 4 of 18.
Two findings that change earlier conclusions.
4B is the first rung to overfit inside one epoch. Its series runs 2.832, 2.816,
2.814, 2.820, 2.824, 2.825, 2.825 -- a minimum around step 75 and then a turn. Both
smaller rungs plateaued without turning, so the optimal epoch count shrinks as the
carrier grows and my earlier "one epoch is right for this corpus" holds only for
the small end. The consequence is operational: the adapter directory holds the
end-of-run weights at 2.825 rather than the step-75 best at 2.814, and it exists as
a recoverable checkpoint only because save_steps was set. The voice arms were cut
from the end-of-run adapter, so the booth understates 4B slightly.
The tone-override also appears to close. On the operator's frame prompt asking for
a wonderful story, 1.7B held the frame on every seed but killed the animals on two
of four; 4B kept them alive on both seeds, and one of them had the narrator doubt
the story he was told and supply a parallel childhood memory to explain the doubt.
That is a narrator with an interior position on the tale. Two samples per arm, so
directionally right rather than established.
vh
25eb65e23b