Pre-flighting the staged A16 build before handing it to brokkr-smithy-dev's
battery found a second axis hiding inside what was supposed to be a
single-variable control.
The A16 build ships a STALE chat template. Verified by hash against the upstream
weights on the same disk: google/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it is 390 lines, the RedHatAI
A4 build's is 389 and byte-identical to upstream once trailing newlines are
normalised, and the prithivMLmods A16 build's is 266 and is not. The delta is
not cosmetic — upstream and A4 open the thinking path with
`{%- set enable_thinking = enable_thinking | default(false) -%}` and branch off
it, while the A16 template has no such set and guards with
`enable_thinking is defined and enable_thinking` instead. tokenizer_config.json
corroborates: A4's response_schema carries a `thinking` property, A16's has only
role and content. That build was quantized from an older revision of the
checkpoint.
Served with its own template, the A16 arm would render a different prompt for
identical messages, and a contradiction-detection delta could be attributed to
activation precision when it was the template. That is the same failure class as
the misnamed-A16 repos — a field nobody validated, believed because the name
looked right — one layer further down, and it would have produced a result that
looked like a finding.
Overriding is safe because the tokenizers agree: vocab identical at 262,144
entries, added_tokens identical, so the same template over the same vocab
renders the same token ids. Everything else pre-flights clean — both artifacts
complete with no missing shards, generation_config.json byte-identical.
Seat NOT flipped; displacing production for the bench window is the operator's
call and is still open.
vh
24e8826219