Files
esh-pfi-infrastructure/persistent-memory.d/2026-07-14-gitea-test-delivery-204-is-not-proof-a.md
T
vh d710e56aca memory: migrate persistent-memory.md to two-tier index (53 detail files)
Split the 53 over-threshold dated log entries (Recent decisions, Tried
and abandoned) into per-entry persistent-memory.d/<slug>.md detail files,
leaving one-line pointers in the index; the 10 short entries stay inline.
Startup index drops 60,527 -> 25,256 bytes (492 -> 270 lines); entry
bodies move verbatim to on-demand detail files, so a fresh session loads
~25 KB instead of ~60 KB and pulls a detail file only when its pointer is
relevant. Top matter (Repo purpose, Tools & conventions, Current state)
is unchanged; both archival back-references preserved.

CLAUDE.md persistent-memory section now documents the index<->detail read
discipline (read the index, pull details on demand, never bulk-read the
dir, commit both together).

Auto-archival still held every dated entry back (all <30 days old); the
July burst begins aging past the 30-day guard ~2026-07-31.
2026-07-15 13:33:42 -07:00

429 B

  • [2026-07-14] gitea "test-delivery 204" is NOT proof a webhook works (204 = gitea queuing, not the listener receiving) — and a proxy test signing with the listener's OWN secret proves the listener, not gitea's real delivery. Both red herrings cost a round of the soong-lab webhook diagnosis. Diagnose from BOTH ends: sender (docker logs gitea | grep webhook → the deny '<ip>' line) AND an instrumented receiver.