I claimed in 100670e that DCGM's config enforcement was plausibly gated to datacenter
SKUs and told the operator not to plan around it. That was a guess presented as a caveat
and it is wrong. Verified against NVIDIA's own documentation at the operator's request.
Supported platforms explicitly cover 'All NVIDIA Maxwell and newer non-datacenter (e.g.
NVIDIA GeForce or NVIDIA Quadro) GPUs', and the feature-overview table marks
Configuration Management as supported for Tesla, Titan, Quadro and GeForce alike --
where Configuration Management explicitly includes 'Power Limit: Set the maximum allowed
power consumption'. What is actually gated on non-datacenter cards is diagnostics: Level
1 only, against All Levels on Tesla. Configuration was never the restricted part.
One soft edge retained rather than papered over: the table says 'Quadro', the former name
for the professional line, and RTX 6000 Ada / RTX PRO 6000 are its successors, so placing
them in that column is inference rather than quotation. One command on the box settles it.
What does not change is the distribution question. DCGM_CONFIG_POWER_BUDGET_GROUP is
available to us, but the docs still never state how a group budget is divided, and the
NVML argument is untouched -- there is no bank-level register, so it resolves to per-GPU
writes either way and the likely finding is static even division, which is exactly
4 x 250 W. The experiment is therefore promoted from curiosity back to a real test.
vh
5a5f5c267e