R49 name-pool token-split re-measurement after the dense-Qwen3 carrier ruling. Run 2026-09-09 23:2x PT on pfi-gx10 via scripts/training-probes/tokenize_name_pool.py against brokkr-smithy research/R49-author-voice-adapters/tools/name_dictionary.json (unmodified). Names tokenized with a leading space. Pool DEDUPED across locales, which reconciles with the dictionary's own `totals` block: male_given 5,339 and female_given 5,226 match exactly. dictionary totals block: {"male_given": 5339, "female_given": 5226, "surnames_neutral": 11840, "surnames_gendered_pairs": 3, "ambiguous_dropped": 167} deduped measured : {"male_given": 5339, "female_given": 5226, "surnames": 13549} sum 24114 (surnames differs because this unions surnames_male/surnames_female in as well.) == Qwen3-1.7B-Base config vocab 151,936 tokenizer.vocab_size 151,643 male_given mean 2.40 multi 87.1% 1tok 12.9% 2tok 47.2% 3tok 29.0% 4tok 9.1% 5tok 1.6% 6tok 0.2% female_given mean 2.44 multi 92.3% 1tok 7.7% 2tok 51.7% 3tok 30.9% 4tok 8.5% 5tok 1.1% 6tok 0.2% surnames mean 2.48 multi 90.7% 1tok 9.3% 2tok 44.7% 3tok 35.9% 4tok 9.0% 5tok 1.2% 6tok 0.1% POOL mean 2.46 multi 90.3% == Qwen3.5-2B-Base config vocab 248,320 tokenizer.vocab_size 248,044 male_given mean 2.25 multi 83.6% 1tok 16.4% 2tok 50.5% 3tok 25.5% 4tok 6.6% 5tok 0.9% 6tok 0.0% female_given mean 2.33 multi 90.2% 1tok 9.8% 2tok 55.5% 3tok 27.8% 4tok 6.1% 5tok 0.9% 6tok 0.0% surnames mean 2.36 multi 88.8% 1tok 11.2% 2tok 49.2% 3tok 32.9% 4tok 6.1% 5tok 0.5% 6tok 0.0% POOL mean 2.33 multi 88.0% READ: the multi-token property STRENGTHENS on the dense carrier, 88.0% -> 90.3%, mean 2.33 -> 2.46. A smaller vocabulary fragments more, so Qwen3's 151,936 splits names into more pieces than Qwen3.5's 248,320. The operator's requirement -- multi-token names forcing reconstruction from the prefix rather than recall of one embedding -- is better served after the ruling, not worse. POSITIVE CONTROL: the Qwen3.5 column reproduces R49 F02's published figure for the same pool on the same tokenizer (F02: 89% multi-token, mean 2.35; here: 88.0%, 2.33). Within a point on both, so the instrument recovers a known-true value before being asked about an unknown one.