5 Commits

Include renames

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
vh	91bda3c480	fv-ml1: complete the cutover — rename, renumber, DNS, and the LiteLLM repoint ... The box is physically at Fountain Valley, renamed, renumbered onto 10.251/16, and serving inference again. This lands the repo half of that. Host: hostname ana-ml2 -> fv-ml1, pinned to 10.251.50.54 by a dnsmasq reservation so the address the runbook, DNS and LiteLLM all assume is the address it actually has. Its headscale node is renamed too. The sweep ran from scripts/fv-ml1-rename-sweep.sh, whose allowlist is the reason this diff touches current-state files and not the record. Dated persistent-memory entries, archival-memory and incident notes still say ana-ml2 in 31 and 62 places respectively, because that is what the box was when those things happened. Rewriting them would make the history lie. LiteLLM was the load-bearing piece and needed more than the api_base sed the runbook describes. Twenty api_base entries repointed, but a grep-and-verify pass also caught a LIVE pass_through_endpoints target for the scalar-judge reward route still on the old address -- an api_base-only substitution would have left it dead. Four prose references describing current state were repointed as well; one historical note recording where a hand-test was run is deliberately left pointing at 10.250.50.54. Two facts in the server tables were wrong and are corrected here. The site is Fountain Valley, not Anaheim. And the box has FOUR RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q, not two -- verified by nvidia-smi -L and independently by PCI enumeration of four GB202GL devices. That is 391 GB of VRAM rather than 196, which changes what fits on it. DNS: fv-ml1, fv-ml1-bmc and fv-gw added under the fv site via the piggyback approach, scriberr re-homed, and the ana-ml2 records removed. Applied to all three resolvers. The BMC record carries a warning that its 802.1q VLAN tag must stay disabled -- it shipped tagging VLAN 250 into an untagged port, which made it invisible to every network-side diagnostic and is the reason it appeared dead through several cable changes. Verified end to end: summarizer and sec both answer through the Anaheim gateway across the mesh to FV seats on different ports.	2026-09-12 22:00:50 -07:00
vh	5415fd4b30	docs(gemma4-charrp): abliteration measured in isolation — close to free, but it MOVES capability ... Second bench window, operator-authorised after an initial decline and reversal. Stock BF16 against the llmfan46 abliterated BF16: same precision, same pinned upstream template, same 192 items, CoT off. Abliteration was the only axis that moved, which is what the previous run could not claim. Net core cost is 0.6 points — but the headline understates what happened. Capability MOVED rather than degraded: five items lost on contradiction detection, four gained on spatial composition, nearly cancelling. A gain was not predicted by anyone, least of all on that axis. The decision this was authorised to settle: llmfan46 stands as the trainee base. No case for re-staging on TrevorJS at KL 0.09 over 0.6 points — the KL gap between the builds is smaller than the gap this measurement failed to find. Both limits recorded rather than buried, per brokkr-smithy-dev: the swings are ~5 and ~4 items at n=32, so the -15.6/+12.5 percentages read more precisely than the measurement supports and only marginals were run; and this says nothing about quantization, because the stock-NVFP4 T2 figure came from n=16 against n=32 here — different item counts mean different item sets, so that comparison is n-confounded and is not being made. Turnaround was five minutes rather than fifteen because the gemma4-trainee-bench stack already existed — itself the residue of debugging a 35-restart crash-loop caused by the production compose hardcoding --quantization compressed-tensors. The fix outlasted the incident. gen restored and verified through the gateway; char-rp remains down deliberately; bench stack env reset to the heretic base for the post-tune gate.	2026-08-24 15:39:43 -07:00
vh	14ff4a3f57	docs(gemma4-charrp): stage two abliterated trainee bases; record the endemic stale-template trap ... The operator directed that the ERP/RP trainee base be a low-damage abliterated instruct build rather than the stock checkpoint. Two are now staged under /tank/aimodels/, both BF16, both unquantized, both matching upstream's 51.61 GB / 25.8B shape with only transformers_version differing in config: gemma4-26b-a4b-it-heretic-bf16 llmfan46, Heretic v1.2.0 ARA, KL 0.1237, refusals 3/100 gemma4-26b-a4b-it-abliterated-bf16 TrevorJS, KL 0.09, 1/100 effective and 5/686 cross-dataset "Low damage" was treated as a measurable claim rather than a description: the field spreads from KL 0.09 to 0.4118 and the table is in the README so the next choice is made on numbers. Fleet anchor for reading them — our own abliteration work found Heretic at KL 0.12 preserved the MTP head at 83.7% acceptance, so both staged builds sit inside an already-validated band rather than past it. huihui-ai is rejected despite its reputation: no published metrics, its own card calls the method a crude proof-of-concept, it abliterates both thinking and non-thinking modes, and its parameter count runs ~738M over upstream. The operator's independent read matched. The more durable finding is the chat template. NOT ONE third-party Gemma-4 derivative pulled here ships upstream's — three independent repos carry the identical stale 266-line file (sha 58c66fdee4afa297), llmfan46 carries a third 365-line variant, and only the RedHatAI NVFP4 build matches upstream's 6a1015c47ccfcfa6. It propagated through the ecosystem rather than one packager slipping, and it is now recorded as a class rather than as the single incident that surfaced it during the A16 control staging. That matters twice over and silently both times: serving a mismatched template renders a different prompt, which is why production pins it; and training through `base/chat_template.jinja` means training on a different prompt format than production serves — train/serve skew with no error, presenting as a tuning failure. brokkr-smithy-dev has been warned on the training side while the harness contract is still early enough to amend.	2026-08-24 13:52:00 -07:00
vh	8d6a9390de	docs(gemma4-charrp): RETRACT the contradiction-deficit claim — the item was ill-posed ... Supersedes what commit 3446367 recorded. That message stated the A16 control "settles a question" and quoted 12% contradiction detection against gen's 81%. The quantization half of it stands; the deficit it was measuring does not exist. brokkr-smithy-dev retracted the finding after the operator asked to see the individual items. The task presented two mutually contradicting statements and asked for "the contradicting statement" — but CONTRADICTION IS SYMMETRIC. Neither statement was more the contradicting one, the model had no way to know which had been inserted, and it consistently named the absolute claim: a defensible reading that the labelling scored wrong on every single item. The tell was there and both of us walked past it: 12% on a five-option task is BELOW THE 20% CHANCE FLOOR. A below-chance score indicts the instrument before it indicts the model. That should be the first reaction to a below-chance result, not a late one, and it is now written into the README as such. Retracted: "the model owns the contradiction deficit"; "domain tuning costs 43 points of contradiction detection" (which on a sound instrument does not shrink but REVERSES); and every pre-fix T2 number for Gemma-4, MeroMero-v2, sec and gen. A second defect surfaced during the fix — all generators shared one RNG, so rewriting one task reshuffled every task after it. What survives is real and worth separating out: the A16 control result holds. Activation precision is close to free on this workload, every other task identical across the W4A4 and W4A16 builds. The two staging confounds caught before the run — the two Hub repos named NVFP4A16 that declare 4-bit activations, and the stale chat template — were independent of the item defect and remain load-bearing. On the corrected instrument Gemma leads the very axis it was suspected of failing (94% against sec's 81% and gen's 50%); its actual weak axis with thinking off is spatial composition at 69%. Recorded as a dated superseded-claims table rather than a silent edit, per the repo's quant-work convention, so notes elsewhere stop misleading people.	2026-08-24 13:07:58 -07:00
vh	1bd90eaacc	docs(gemma4-charrp): stack README — the three model dirs, the A16 control runbook ... The stack had no README and now carries three model directories that look interchangeable and are not: the BF16 QLoRA base that cannot be served here, the W4A4 quant that is served, and the W4A16 build that exists solely as an activation-axis control. Writing down which is which, and why, before someone "simplifies" the compose to the BF16 path and rediscovers the OOM. Also captures the A16 control procedure end to end, including the two confounds found while staging it — the two Hub repos named NVFP4A16 that declare 4-bit activations, and the stale chat template the real one ships — and the fact that overriding the template is safe because the tokenizers are identical. Both sides have now cross-checked this: brokkr independently diffed every non-quantization config field of both builds against the upstream BF16 and found only transformers_version differing. Residual risk recorded rather than hidden: config identity is not weight identity and nobody has done a dequantization pass. The Gemma-4 flags are documented as architecture-level rather than checkpoint-level, since that is why they survived the seat swap unchanged, and the enable_thinking:false pin is called out as mandatory rather than stylistic — without it every plain prose turn lands in reasoning_content with a null content and every consumer breaks. Notes the non-termination defect with thinking on (32 of 96 calls truncating at 12k tokens, all 16 constraint items among them, reasoning sound right up to the point it fails to stop) and why VLLM_USE_V2_MODEL_RUNNER=0 is deliberately not applied to a seat whose production mode is thinking-off. No live change: the seat is still serving the W4A4 build. Displacing it for the control run is an operator decision and is still open.	2026-08-24 12:34:50 -07:00