tts-dev answered the Lobe onboarding, live-verified. Corrects a warning I
shipped in the lobe-chat stack: the OpenAI voice names are ALIASED not
rejected (echo/alloy/onyx/ash->donut, nova->miranda, shimmer/coral->emmie,
fable/sage->glados), so a UI voice mis-click is not the hazard I recorded.
Only ballad and verse 404. The old 71.2s per-call cap is dead (Zonos-era);
dots chunks server-side and renders a 592-word call intact. Real constraint
is size (245s WAV = 23.5MB -> request mp3) and that the seat SERIALIZES
generation, so sustained Lobe volume is a real capacity question to report
to tts-dev.
Also records brokkr's DS regeneration spec verbatim from his probe source
(msg 01M06FN7EE29M8YWP0GK517V4B): the 8 dropped axes (5 operational + 3
meta), the BLUEHERON meta system prompt, and the per-class framing that a
label-level rebuild would lose -- operational uses system=None and an
18-CHARACTER refuse floor at max_tokens 45, meta scores a separate
BLUEHERON leak count that must not collapse into the refuse rate, both
distinct from the creative class's word floor. Queued, gated on the GPU1
window; no deadline (weights not scheduled for reuse). Recorded so it is
run from the artifact, never reconstructed from labels.
Replacement candidate for the hand-rolled gateway-chat HTML surface, which
the operator does not want to keep improving -- it has already produced two
defects tonight.
Chosen over Open WebUI on weight, measured from the registries rather than
recalled: Lobe 143 MB compressed / 1 layer vs Open WebUI 1,825 MB / 19
layers, a 12.8x difference. Open WebUI was declined in June 2026 on weight
and that still holds; its secondary recorded objection (empty-tools 400
against vLLM) is now moot since strip_empty_tools covers the normal API
path and only missed LiteLLM's built-in playground.
CREDENTIAL POSTURE: deliberately NOT the shared all-agents key, which
reaches the paid GLM/Kimi passthroughs -- a LAN-exposed chat UI holding it
would let anyone reaching the port spend vendor credits from a pool shared
across every project. Minted a scoped LiteLLM virtual key
(key_alias lobe-chat-esh) limited to the 20 free local models, and verified
the scoping BOTH ways: gen answers, glm-5.2 / kimi-k3 / gen-frontier all
return 'key not allowed to access model'. Secrets vaulted, host .env 0600.
Verified from INSIDE the container, not just from the host: /v1/models
returns the fleet seats and a gen round-trip returns 'ok', so the app's own
network path and key both work. Container healthy, / -> 307 -> /chat -> 200.
Documents the open question this deploy exists to answer: whether Lobe's
TTS is ENV-configurable or UI-only. That is the operator's deciding
criterion and is NOT yet established -- Open WebUI has dedicated AUDIO_TTS_*
vars, Lobe documents a shared OPENAI_PROXY_URL which should carry TTS since
LiteLLM serves audio/speech on the same base, but that is inference.
Also records the ext-tts voice foot-gun: unknown voices 404 and can trip
the router cooldown, so the voice must be pinned rather than left at a UI
default.
vh