docs(althing): check the hook list, not the version string
A version number cannot tell you what a stale plugin cost. 0.0.1 and 0.1.1 differ by two hooks and a script, so the runbook now carries a check that compares hook lists across cached versions and looks for pane-route.sh directly. Also records why this hid for five days, which is the more transferable half. A missing deploy surface does not present as an error -- it presents as "the migration needs manual work", and there was a ready explanation for that, because four of five seats were non-Claude and genuinely did need hand-holding. The seat that falsified the story was our own: a Claude Code seat that should have self-declared and did not, and it looked exactly like the other four. Nobody asked why the automatic path had not fired on the one seat it was built for. So: when a migration needs manual intervention, verify the automatic path was actually deployed before concluding it does not apply to your case.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -505,3 +505,32 @@ to degrading to silence. Routes written by 3.2.0 stay parseable to 3.1.2 (the ol
|
||||
ignores unknown keys), so nothing is stranded.
|
||||
|
||||
Thread: `01M1G8EJ2K1DD6NEDRNN1PR9N0`.
|
||||
|
||||
## `[2026-09-02]` THE LESSON forseti AND I BOTH WANT KEPT
|
||||
|
||||
> **A missing deploy surface does not present as an error. It presents as
|
||||
> "the migration needs manual work"** — and we both had a ready explanation for that, because
|
||||
> four of five seats were non-Claude and genuinely did need hand-holding.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠ **The seat that falsified the story was infra-ops' own** — a Claude Code seat that should have
|
||||
self-declared and did not, and it looked exactly like the other four. Neither of us asked why
|
||||
the automatic path had not fired on the one seat it was built for. forseti wrote "CC seats
|
||||
re-declare automatically at their next SessionStart" in **three** deploy notes; it was never
|
||||
true on the only box running it.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠ **Check the HOOK LIST, not the version string.** 0.0.1 vs 0.1.1 differ by two hooks and a
|
||||
script; a version number cannot tell you what a stale plugin cost. Check in
|
||||
`docs/runbooks/althing-deploy.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
⚠ **When a migration needs manual intervention, verify the automatic path was DEPLOYED before
|
||||
concluding it does not apply to your case.**
|
||||
|
||||
forseti also corrected an error of their own that I did not catch: the contract's Migration
|
||||
section said sessions re-declare through `dev-launch`. They do not — it is the plugin hook.
|
||||
Wrong since 3.2.0.
|
||||
|
||||
**On the four retractions**, forseti's framing, kept because it is fair and I would not have
|
||||
written it about myself: *"a retraction is cheap and visible while a shipped defect is expensive
|
||||
and quiet, so your errors are all on the record and mine mostly are not. You catching four of
|
||||
your own in one night is the system working."* Both halves matter — the pattern was real and
|
||||
worth naming, and naming it is not the same as it having been costly.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user