docs(lv-mccarthy): record the gate result -- voice passes, memorisation is the cleanest in the line, NOT shipped

720 generations, 3 arms x 60 held-out beats x 4 seeds, against the design frozen
in GATE-PREREG.md before any arm existed.

AXIS A VOICE -- PASS, both candidates, both reads. Span 0.661 -> 0.370 = 0.291
achievable; ckpt900 closed 59.1% (+0.172, but only 1.2x its floor), ckpt450 52.2%
(+0.152 at 2.9x). The normalised secondary read HOLDS at +0.124 / +0.114, so about
three quarters of the gain survives stripping every punctuation mark -- the voice
is not the cheap win the register made available.

AXIS B NOT COPIED -- ckpt450 is the cleanest result in the line. 0.12 hit-rate
against the author's own held-out 0.12, and its longest match (11 words) is
SHORTER than the author's coincidental longest (12). All 96 matched runs were
read: stock grammar in the commonest words, the name-shaped hits are the RENAMED
inventions, nothing protectable. The amendment is why this reads as clean -- the
defective base control would have shown 0.12 vs 0.00 as a 12x red flag.
Separately measured: the "his register makes collisions inevitable" story that
was FALSE for Hemingway (0.01) is TRUE for McCarthy (0.12). Neither transfers.

AXIS C NO DAMAGE -- FAIL, both, and it survives reading. 20% (ckpt450) / 28%
(ckpt900) of generations overshoot the 90-140 band against base's 1%; p90 171/190
words, max 297/279. The worst case is degenerate looping, not a long McCarthy
sentence. Base is GOOD on this axis here (0.89 in-band vs Hemingway's 0.05), so
the adapter measurably makes instruction-following worse.

NOT SHIPPED. Section 7 rule 3 makes axis C disqualifying outright.

Recorded honestly: my own prereg's axis C transcribed score_beats.py's v1
criteria, including "in-band up on base", which the operator RETIRED on
2026-09-15 for exactly the reason it fails here -- base maxes it, so it is
unsatisfiable on this corpus regardless of adapter quality. Under the operator's
v2 (ran-on only) ckpt450 passes by 0.01 against a 0.200 floor. That reading was
found AFTER the numbers and was NOT used; lv-bronte's floor defect is the in-line
precedent for finding one and declining to exploit it. The prereg gets fixed
prospectively for the next author, not re-read for this one.

And the finding worth more than the adapter: the two-epoch recipe is now 0 for 3,
and this time the loss curve was CONFIDENTLY wrong. On Bronte and Hemingway the
epoch-1/epoch-2 checkpoints were tied, so preferring the earlier one cost nothing.
Here the curve resolved epoch 2 as better at 4.9x the median neighbour jitter --
and epoch 2 lost every axis that resolves: 4.0x wider seed spread, 1.8x the
author's memorisation rate against 1.0x, more ran-on, worse on-beat. Its only win
is a 0.019 voice point estimate, inside the floor, and its spread is one outlier
seed -- the third occurrence of that shape in the later checkpoint after
lv-bronte's ckpt925 and lv-hemingway's ckpt1750.

Raw artifacts committed at scripts/mccarthy-corpus/gate-results/ so the claims can
be re-read without gx10.
This commit is contained in:
Vuong Hoang
2026-09-21 16:31:41 -07:00
parent 0d80e493a8
commit 4c3f3896f1
8 changed files with 561 additions and 11 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,217 @@
# `[2026-09-21]` lv-mccarthy: gate run, NOT SHIPPED — the voice works, the memorisation is the cleanest in the line, and the length discipline is gone
**Status: NOT SHIPPED.** Both gated candidates are disqualified by axis C under the
pre-registration as frozen. The operator had pre-authorised "ship it if the gate passes";
it did not pass, and their conditional preserved that branch.
Gate design pre-registered before any generation existed:
`scripts/mccarthy-corpus/GATE-PREREG.md`, commit `9c8a4e9`, amended `b4ba731` and `0d80e49`.
Raw artifacts committed at `scripts/mccarthy-corpus/gate-results/`; arms and generations at
`gx10:~/r49-runs/mccarthy-eval/`.
## First: the run WAS complete, and had been for three days
`persistent-memory.md` carried "lv-mccarthy's run outcome STILL UNVERIFIED" as the top
in-flight item for two days. It finished **2026-09-18 00:49 PT** — 1,380/1,380 steps in
2h30m47s, `train_loss` 2.172. Three days of "unverified" was a reporting gap, not a failure.
⚠ `~/r49-runs/` does not exist on nh3-dev; the runs are on **pfi-gx10 = 10.100.50.60**, which
does not resolve by name from nh3-dev.
## The result — 3 arms × 60 held-out beats × 4 seeds = 720 generations
| axis | ckpt900 (ep 1.96, loss min) | ckpt450 (ep 0.98) | verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| **A. VOICE** | +0.172, **1.2×** floor 0.148 | +0.152, **2.9×** floor 0.052 | ✅ both PASS, both reads |
| **B. NOT COPIED** | 0.22 = 1.8× the author | **0.12 = 1.0× the author** | ✅ ckpt450 clean, ckpt900 elevated |
| **C. NO DAMAGE** | fails all three criteria | fails two of three | ❌ **both FAIL** |
```
same-author target (held-out McCarthy vs itself) delta_cb 0.370 <- best achievable
ckpt900 0.490
ckpt450 0.509
base-unadapted 0.661
```
Span 0.661 → 0.370 = 0.291. ckpt900 closed **59.1%**, ckpt450 **52.2%** — between lv-bronte
(48%) and lv-hemingway (73.8%), on an axis deliberately made harder (§5a hands the register's
punctuation tics to the control).
## ⭐⭐ AXIS B: the corrected control turned a 12× red flag into a clean pass
The pre-registration as first written inherited `memorization_check.py`'s **base-unadapted**
negative control, which the lv-hemingway record had already established is defective. Caught
while the base arm was still generating and amended append-only before any McCarthy number
was read (AMENDMENT 1). The correct innocent sample is the author himself.
```
sample n hit-rate mean-longest max
HELD-OUT McCARTHY (untrained) 364 0.12 1.0 12 <- the innocent rate
base-unadapted 240 0.00 0.0 8
ckpt450 240 0.12 1.1 11
ckpt900 240 0.22 1.9 11
positive control (train vs train) 160 <- not blind
```
⭐ **ckpt450 is INDISTINGUISHABLE from real unseen McCarthy** — 0.12 against 0.12, and its
longest match (11 words) is **SHORTER than the author's own coincidental longest (12)**. That
is the best axis-B result in the line. Against the defective base control its 0.12-vs-0.00
would have read as a **12× red flag**; against the correct one it is **1.0×**. The amendment
is the only reason this adapter is not on the record as memorising.
⭐ **And the "register makes collisions inevitable" story — FALSE for Hemingway — is TRUE
here, measured rather than assumed.** Hemingway's held-out rate was 0.01; McCarthy's is 0.12.
His idiom really does self-collide at 8 grams (`and he looked at the`), so the same argument
that was a comfortable excuse there is a fact here. Authors are not interchangeable on this
axis and neither number transfers.
**All 96 matched runs were READ** (`gate-results/memorisation-matches.txt`), not counted.
Longest 11 words, every one stock grammar in the commonest words:
```
he looked at the wolf and he looked at him
leaned back in his chair and looked at the boy
He reached into his pocket and took out the
I dont know What are you goin to do
```
The name-shaped hits (`Adam Caleb`, `Toribio`) are the **RENAMED invented names**, not
McCarthy's — the `swift tristan` precedent exactly. No plot, no imagery, nothing protectable.
⚠ McCarthy is in copyright with a living estate and this axis still comes out clean for
ckpt450.
## ❌ AXIS C: the damage is real, and reading it confirms the criterion
```
arm n in-band on-beat ran-on words p90 max over-140
base 240 0.89 0.71 0.01 110 126 149 1%
ckpt450 240 0.67 0.45 0.20 108 171 297 20%
ckpt900 240 0.67 0.42 0.28 114 190 279 28%
floor 0.200
```
Not an artifact. **Base is GOOD here** (0.89 in-band against Hemingway's 0.05, because
McCarthy's register prompt is far more prescriptive and Qwen3-4B-Instruct follows it), and the
adapter measurably makes it worse — 22 points of in-band, 26–29 of on-beat, and 20–28× base's
overshoot rate.
Read the worst case and it is **degenerate looping**, not a long McCarthy sentence:
> *…and then he looked at the wolf and he looked at the road and he looked at the sun and he
> looked at the road again.* — ckpt900, b41, 279 words against a 90–140 ask
## ⚠ THE COMPLICATION, AND WHY IT DID NOT BECOME A SHIP
My pre-registration's §6 axis C transcribed `score_beats.py`'s **v1** three-part criterion,
including "in-band up on base beyond the floor". The operator **retired** in-band and on-beat
from the gate on 2026-09-15 for precisely the reason they fail here — the script's own
docstring says *"NOT carried into v2: in-band (unresolvable — base maxes it) and on-beat."*
The v2 axis C is **ran-on only**, and `VERDICT: DO-NOT-SCALE` in the output is the superseded
v1 label the script still prints "for continuity".
```
frozen prereg (v1 criteria) ckpt900 fails 3 of 3 ckpt450 fails 2 of 3
operator's v2 (ran-on only) ckpt900 +0.27 FAILS ckpt450 +0.19 passes by 0.01
```
So my own pre-registration contains a criterion **unsatisfiable on this corpus regardless of
adapter quality**. That is a defect in the pre-registration, not in the adapter — and it is
still not a reason to ship:
1. The frozen rule fails both candidates, and §7 rule 3 makes axis C disqualifying outright.
2. The reading that rescues ckpt450 was found **after** seeing the numbers. That is the exact
shape pre-registration exists to prevent, and lv-bronte's floor defect is the in-line
precedent for finding one and deliberately not exploiting it.
3. Even under that reading the margin is **0.01 against a floor of 0.200** — noise-adjacent.
4. The damage survives reading, not just the criterion. 20% of ckpt450's generations blow the
length budget and the worst ones loop.
**Fix the pre-registration prospectively for the next author, do not re-read it for this one.**
## ⭐⭐⭐ THE TWO-EPOCH RECIPE IS NOW 0 FOR 3 — AND THIS TIME THE LOSS CURVE WAS CONFIDENTLY WRONG
On Brontë and Hemingway the epoch-1 and epoch-2 checkpoints were **tied** on eval loss, so
preferring the earlier one cost nothing and could be dismissed as taste. Here the curve
**resolved** epoch 2 as better — ckpt900 at 2.38706 against ckpt450's 2.4063, **+4.9× the
0.00393 median neighbour jitter**, nowhere near tied — and it was wrong on every axis that
resolves:
| | ckpt450 | ckpt900 | ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| seed spread (voice) | **0.037** | 0.148 | **4.0× wider** |
| memorisation vs the author's 0.12 | **0.12 (1.0×)** | 0.22 (1.8×) | |
| ran-on | **0.20** | 0.28 | |
| on-beat | **0.45** | 0.42 | |
| epochs of overfit | **0.98** | 1.96 | |
ckpt900's only advantage is a 0.019 better voice point estimate, which sits inside the floor.
And its spread is **one outlier seed** — 0.605 against 0.457 / 0.531 / 0.554 — the third
occurrence of that shape in the later checkpoint, after lv-bronte's ckpt925 and
lv-hemingway's ckpt1750 (0.491 / 0.449 / 0.468 / **0.562**).
⭐ **The durable rule: on this schedule the eval-loss minimum is not the ship candidate, and
the loss curve's CONFIDENCE about it carries no information.** Read the resolving axes. This
is now measured on three corpora and should be the default for Faulkner, Morrison and Chandler
rather than re-derived each time.
## ⚠ A bug in my own confound detector, and the order I found it in
§5c pre-registered a trigger: base quote density over **100 per 10k** means the control did
not take the punctuation win it was handed, and the normalised secondary read is promoted to
load-bearing. The base arm finished first, so I evaluated it early, **saw it FIRE at 224.7**,
and only then — reading the reference row against a corpus whose builder ASSERTS 0.0 — found
that `_QUOTE_RE` contained `'` and `’`. It was an apostrophe counter wearing a quote-mark
label, on the one corpus whose signature is `dont`/`aint`/`wont`.
```
as implemented TRUE quotes all apostrophes
held-out McCarthy ref 121.1 0.0 121.1
base-unadapted 224.7 19.9 204.8
held-out Hemingway ref 1112.6 694.7 351.7
```
Fixing a detector to measure the quantity the frozen rule names is not moving the rule — but
the fix un-fires the trigger, which is indistinguishable from shopping. **So the trigger was
made MOOT rather than adjudicated** (AMENDMENT 2): the normalised read is load-bearing
unconditionally for this gate, both columns reported, and the fix has zero verdict effect.
There is a better reason anyway — base's true density is 19.9 against the reference's 0.0, so
it did not fully comply and a small residual cheap win genuinely exists.
⭐ The normalised read **HOLDS**: ckpt900 +0.124 at 1.2× and ckpt450 +0.114 at 2.5×, against
primaries of +0.172 and +0.152. So roughly three quarters of the voice gain survives having
every punctuation mark removed — **the voice is not the punctuation trick.** Validated on
Hemingway first, where the secondary read also resolves a gap rather than flattening
everything, so a null here would have been a finding rather than a blind instrument.
⚠ **The lesson is the one this line keeps relearning somewhere new:** I controlled
`strip_punct` (2500 → 0) and the byte-identity of the default path, and never asked the quote
counter for a value whose answer I already knew. The corpus asserts 0.0. That check cost one
line and was available before the gate launched.
## Instruments built, each validated against a documented finding
| instrument | control |
|---|---|
| `voice_distance.py --secondary-normalised --punct-report` | default path reproduces the shipped lv-hemingway `voice_distance.txt` **byte for byte** |
| `memorization_check.py --train-only --heldout-reference` | reproduces lv-hemingway's hand-computed held-out row **to the digit** (370 samples, 0.01, 0.1, max 10, 101-word chunks) |
| `show_memorisation_matches.py` (new) | reproduces the lv-hemingway reading **to the word**, including `swift tristan` as the one name-shaped hit |
| `ship-voice-adapter.sh` (new) | the live lv-hemingway adapter verified byte-identical to gx10's checkpoint-850 |
⚠ The held-out control and the match reading were both done **by hand** for Hemingway and left
no instrument, so the finding was not reproducible. Both are now committed.
⚠ **The waiter I first armed was silently broken**: `pgrep -f "eval-mccarthy.sh"` over ssh
self-matches its own `bash -c` argv, so the DIED branch was unreachable and a crashed gate
would have looked exactly like a running one. Controlled both ways after the fix — bare
pattern demonstrably self-matches, bracketed one does not.
→ [[feedback_pkill_ssh_self_match]]
## What to do next — ckpt450 is the candidate, and an earlier one may beat it
The damage grows monotonically with epoch: base 1% over-band → ckpt450 20% → ckpt900 28%.
`--save-total-limit 60` kept **all 56 checkpoints at 25-step intervals**, so ckpt225 / ckpt300
(epoch ~0.49 / 0.65) are on disk and untested. Voice at 0.5 epoch is unknown and may not have
arrived; that is one arm each to find out. This is a salvageable adapter, not a failed one —
the voice transferred and the memorisation is the cleanest in the line.
Related: [[2026-09-17-lv-hemingway-gate]], [[2026-09-17-lv-bronte-gate]],
[[2026-09-17-mccarthy-d1-d3]], [[2026-09-17-mccarthy-split-name-leak]].