Vuong Hoang
d37b81ab9f
The two dated log sections had never been split, so every one of their 29 entries sat inline and the startup index had grown to 372 lines — which is the cost the two-tier scheme exists to remove, paid on every session that reads the file. 27 entries were over threshold. All 29 now have a detail file under persistent-memory.d/ and a one-line index entry that routes rather than restates. Index: 372 -> 93 lines. No archival. The soft cap fired, but every entry in this repo is dated 2026-09-21 or later, so the under-14-days guard held all of them back — and the split alone took the index well under the target without moving anything out of the active file. The in-flight section is rewritten for the post-release state: nothing is in flight, no gate is outstanding, and the next unit is explicitly recorded as the operator's undecided call rather than as a plan. The session's recommendation (U4, on three grounds) is written down so it does not have to be re-derived, alongside the two alternatives and why they are alternatives. Two dated predictions are carried forward with their dates and their instruments: the U5 adoption re-measure on 2026-09-29, which already reads 3 of 24 announced and 2 with a why from peers told nothing, and the .forever re-count a fortnight AFTER U4 lands, which is U4's own success criterion and is destroyed by running it early.
690 B
690 B
An existing test stopped me retiring documented behaviour
2026-09-22 · booth
An existing test stopped me retiring documented behaviour
while fixing a race. The mtime-restore race is real, and the clean fix —
ignoring a booth directory's own mtime whenever the booth holds anything —
would also have silently retired the rule that RELEASING a kept board resets
its clock, which the CLI header, the README and a deliberately-written test
all pin. That is a TTL doctrine change, not a bug fix. Fixed the concrete half
(a failing os.utime used to escape and 500 the route), left the race stated
in the code. A fix that changes a documented rule is a proposal, not a
patch.