# Seam review and cold panel had zero overlap, twice

_2026-09-21 · booth_

**The two review gates are complementary, measured on one unit.**
The caller-side **seam review** (nine findings, against the real sibling module
surfaces) and the cold **`/heid-contract-review` panel** (four arms,
artifact-only) had **zero overlap in both directions** on U2. The seam review
found a scope miss the panel structurally could not see: the contract omitted
`inline.py`, whose `place()` indexes by subscript, which a frozen dataclass
refuses. The panel found three code defects and a missing test the seam review
had no lens for. Matches heid's kvasir zero-overlap result on the
conformance-versus-hunt axis. **Run both; neither substitutes.**