# The U2 seam review earned its place, and how

_2026-09-21 · booth_

**The U2 seam review earned its place, and the record should
say how.** Nine findings against the real `booth.asks` / `booth.items` /
`booth.inline` surfaces, two of which changed scope or behaviour: `inline.py`
was missing from `touches` entirely (its `place()` indexes asks by
**subscript**, which a frozen dataclass refuses — nothing else in the service
does that), and the partial-answer inconsistency above. The cold
`/heid-contract-review` pass is artifact-only by design and structurally
cannot see a sibling module, so neither it nor a same-model self-review would
have found either. Two more surfaced later and are worth the same note: a
SECOND subscript in `inline.place` the seam review undercounted, and a
regression in my own legacy importer that a retargeted test caught — a
malformed sidecar that renders `⚠ broken` today would have silently vanished
on migration.