vh/booth
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

memory: snapshot — U5 released at v0.3.0, and the index goes two-tier

Browse Source 
The two dated log sections had never been split, so every one of their 29
entries sat inline and the startup index had grown to 372 lines — which is
the cost the two-tier scheme exists to remove, paid on every session that
reads the file. 27 entries were over threshold. All 29 now have a detail
file under persistent-memory.d/ and a one-line index entry that routes
rather than restates. Index: 372 -> 93 lines.

No archival. The soft cap fired, but every entry in this repo is dated
2026-09-21 or later, so the under-14-days guard held all of them back — and
the split alone took the index well under the target without moving
anything out of the active file.

The in-flight section is rewritten for the post-release state: nothing is
in flight, no gate is outstanding, and the next unit is explicitly recorded
as the operator's undecided call rather than as a plan. The session's
recommendation (U4, on three grounds) is written down so it does not have
to be re-derived, alongside the two alternatives and why they are
alternatives.

Two dated predictions are carried forward with their dates and their
instruments: the U5 adoption re-measure on 2026-09-29, which already reads
3 of 24 announced and 2 with a why from peers told nothing, and the
.forever re-count a fortnight AFTER U4 lands, which is U4's own success
criterion and is destroyed by running it early.
This commit is contained in:
Vuong Hoang
2026-09-22 08:20:51 -07:00
parent 95beede3c3
commit d37b81ab9f
30 changed files with 486 additions and 343 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
persistent-memory.d/2026-09-22-scripts-booth-got-tests.md
+11
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
# `scripts/booth` went from zero tests to five
_2026-09-22 · booth_
**`scripts/booth` had zero tests and now has five**
(`tests/test_cli.py`). The panel's guard-strength tables returned UNVERIFIED
for every CLI claim because nothing in the suite executed the script — two of
the round's findings lived in exactly that gap. The new tests run the real
script under the system `python3`, which makes them a live check on INV-1
(stdlib-only) as a side effect: a third-party import in `marks.py` now fails
in the suite the same way it would fail on a fleet host.