memory: snapshot — U7 three-quarters built, blocked on one ruling
U6 shipped as v0.6.0 and a late fix as v0.6.1; U7's three ratified components (rail, filters, grid keyboard) are landed and the fourth is deliberately not, because swapping subfolder sections for filename-derived groups is a scope departure the operator has not ruled on. A test fails if anyone builds it anyway. Two new detail files. One decomposes U7 by ratified-versus-not and records the two decisions taken under stated assumption. The other keeps the mechanism behind today's misrouted directive: pane_find addresses seats by a ROLLING PANE TITLE, which is not a stable address, and the failure is silent from the sender's side -- Miranda had no signal until infra-ops flagged it. The incident resolved; the mechanism did not. The generated handoff committed the modality failure its own step-7 read exists to catch: it listed push, seed and the 17-handle note as imperative Next steps when all three are explicitly gated. Rewritten as do-nots, Next steps emptied. Recorded here because it is the second time the generator has needed that backstop.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
|
||||
# An approved directive misrouted because pane_find addresses by a rolling title
|
||||
|
||||
_2026-09-22 · booth_
|
||||
|
||||
**An operator-approved directive (D-0011, sent by Miranda, telling booth-dev to
|
||||
begin U7) landed on the infra-ops handle instead.** Worth keeping for the
|
||||
mechanism, not the incident: the incident resolved cleanly and the mechanism
|
||||
did not.
|
||||
|
||||
## What happened, and why nothing broke
|
||||
|
||||
`pane_find` matched `terminal_2` **by its ROLLING PANE TITLE**, and that pane is
|
||||
the eshpfi-management seat rather than booth-dev. Miranda confirmed all of this
|
||||
directly when asked.
|
||||
|
||||
infra-ops caught it and **deliberately did not relay the content as an
|
||||
instruction** — their reasoning, which is exactly right: a directive arriving as
|
||||
"infra-ops says Miranda says Vuong says" is two hops from the source, and a peer
|
||||
passing operator authority along is the thing the rules warn about. They sent a
|
||||
routing report instead, quoting only the two lines that identified the target.
|
||||
|
||||
This session then **did not act on it**, and asked Miranda directly rather than
|
||||
taking a peer's word for the operator's. She confirmed it was genuine and
|
||||
**superseded pending the sections ruling**. Both loops closed in two messages.
|
||||
|
||||
## The part that is still true tomorrow
|
||||
|
||||
**A pane title that changes as work moves through the pane is not a stable
|
||||
address.** It put an approved directive on the wrong seat, and:
|
||||
|
||||
- **the failure is silent from the sender's side.** Miranda had no signal it
|
||||
went astray until infra-ops spoke up. A directive that misroutes to a quiet
|
||||
or busy seat simply evaporates.
|
||||
- it landed somewhere that caught it. That was luck, not design.
|
||||
|
||||
Reported to infra-ops as an ops matter (`01M35JJ9034E64HMA8X9C21R2N`), with the
|
||||
mechanism named and no fix proposed — not this repo's call. **Not tracked
|
||||
anywhere by booth-dev**; recorded here only so the next session does not
|
||||
re-derive it if a directive goes missing again.
|
||||
|
||||
## The rule this confirms
|
||||
|
||||
The CLAUDE.md Miranda exception is for Miranda relaying **directly**. A
|
||||
second-hand report of a Miranda relay is one hop too far, and infra-ops said so
|
||||
before this session had to. Going to the source cost two messages and settled it.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
||||
# U7 is three-quarters built and blocked on one word
|
||||
|
||||
_2026-09-22 · booth_
|
||||
|
||||
**The last v1 unit, decomposed by what the operator has already ratified versus
|
||||
what he has not.** ROADMAP's U7 row names four components. Three were already
|
||||
approved there and are **built, tested and deployed** (`a306e2d`). The fourth is
|
||||
a scope departure and is **deliberately not built**.
|
||||
|
||||
| component | ROADMAP | state |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| sticky rail | ratified | **landed** — totals + per-filter counts |
|
||||
| filters | ratified | **landed** — all / flagged / annotated / unanswered |
|
||||
| grid keyboard | ratified | **landed** — `←/→ f n Enter Esc`, bound only when a grid exists |
|
||||
| **sections → filename groups** | **departs** | **NOT BUILT** |
|
||||
|
||||
`tests/test_navigation.py::test_no_group_rail_is_shipped_yet` fails the moment
|
||||
somebody builds the group rail anyway, so the departure cannot arrive by
|
||||
accident while the ruling is outstanding.
|
||||
|
||||
## The question, and why it is his
|
||||
|
||||
**Drop subfolder sections for filename-prefix groups — yes or no?**
|
||||
|
||||
Measured (see [[2026-09-22-u7-remeasured-before-scoping]]): **zero of eleven
|
||||
gallery booths have a subdirectory**, so sections buy nothing; stripping a
|
||||
trailing digit-run from the stem yields **5–16 sensible groups on four of the
|
||||
five large galleries** and degenerates to one group on the fifth. The
|
||||
replacement is better on the evidence — but swapping a ratified component for
|
||||
an unratified one is scope direction, not implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
Contract at `docs/contracts/u7_navigation.contract.md`, status
|
||||
`PARTIALLY LANDED`, with the departure named as the operator's call.
|
||||
|
||||
## Decisions taken under stated assumption, both cheap to reverse
|
||||
|
||||
- **`unanswered` means HAS AN OPEN PICK** — the U4 hold predicate, which already
|
||||
exists. The other reading ("has no mark at all") is a genuinely different
|
||||
question and stays an open question on the contract.
|
||||
- **Filters are LINKS, not scripts**, resolved server-side, so the gallery keeps
|
||||
working with JavaScript off. U3 cost the verbatim path its no-JS operation and
|
||||
said so plainly; the gallery is the surface the operator actually reviews on,
|
||||
and this unit does not repeat it there.
|
||||
|
||||
## The vacuous falsifier, written an hour after the entry about them
|
||||
|
||||
`test_filtering_never_reorders` compared each filtered view against the
|
||||
**unfiltered response** — so a mutation reversing the order reversed both sides
|
||||
and it **stayed green under the exact change it forbade.** Caught only by
|
||||
running the mutation rather than trusting the assertion.
|
||||
|
||||
Rewritten against an independent truth: U1 INV-3 says the order IS `sorted(rel)`,
|
||||
so each view must be sorted, full stop, with no reference to another response.
|
||||
Re-verified RED. **Every new falsifier in this session was mutation-checked
|
||||
after this**, and that is the practice to keep — see
|
||||
[[2026-09-22-vacuous-falsifiers]].
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user