memory: the bug-hunt panel, the raw-first fragment trap, and five vacuous falsifiers
The mechanic worth keeping: browsers match a URL fragment against element ids RAW first and percent-decoded only second, so a raw rel on both the anchor and the id is ambiguous rather than merely unencoded — and encoding one side only relocates the collision. The count worth keeping: five falsifiers in one unit were green under the exact change they forbade, three arms finding the same one independently. A guard-strength pass is the highest-value part of a panel on a diff that is already well tested, because the findings sit in the gaps the comments are most confident about.
This commit is contained in:
+13
-3
@@ -83,9 +83,18 @@ _As of 2026-09-22:_
|
||||
including a known-vacuous falsifier it must catch. **When you write a
|
||||
`*Falsifiable:*` line, add its row and run it** — a falsifier nobody has run
|
||||
is a claim, not a test.
|
||||
- 🔶 **A bug-hunt panel is IN FLIGHT** — heid thread `01M368G2Y0JMTJ2T7M3JMTXV5Z`,
|
||||
dispatched 2026-09-22 21:31 PDT over the U7-groups diff. If its reply has not
|
||||
been consumed, drain `/althing:inbox` and triage before treating U7 as closed.
|
||||
- ✅ **THE BUG-HUNT PANEL LANDED AND IS TRIAGED** (`397ea89`): six defects fixed,
|
||||
two accepted known risks, one held for design-dev. **660 green, 20/20
|
||||
mutation-proved, deployed, 21/21 booths 200.**
|
||||
→ `persistent-memory.d/2026-09-23-the-bug-hunt-panel-and-five-vacuous-falsifiers.md`
|
||||
- ⚠ **BROWSERS MATCH A URL FRAGMENT RAW FIRST, decoded only second.** So a raw
|
||||
rel on BOTH the anchor and the id is not "unencoded", it is AMBIGUOUS, and the
|
||||
jump can land on the WRONG artifact. Encoding one side just moves the
|
||||
collision — **both sides must use `Item.url`.** Same detail file.
|
||||
- ⚠ **FIVE VACUOUS FALSIFIERS IN U7 ALONE**, three arms finding the same one
|
||||
independently. A guard-strength pass is the highest-value part of a panel on a
|
||||
well-tested diff; the findings sit in the gaps the code comments are most
|
||||
confident about.
|
||||
- 🛑 **STANDING RULING — NO ANNOUNCEMENTS OUT OF THIS REPO, AND THE OPERATOR
|
||||
SENDS THE EVENTUAL ONE HIMSELF** (operator, 2026-09-22). Verbatim: *"no
|
||||
announcements until the entire arc is done, and even then i'll do it myself."*
|
||||
@@ -122,6 +131,7 @@ _As of 2026-09-22:_
|
||||
|
||||
## Recent decisions
|
||||
|
||||
- `[2026-09-23]` ✅ **The bug-hunt panel found six defects and five vacuous falsifiers** — READ BEFORE BUILDING ANY FRAGMENT ANCHOR (browsers match raw before decoded, so both sides must be encoded), and before trusting a well-commented diff's guards → `persistent-memory.d/2026-09-23-the-bug-hunt-panel-and-five-vacuous-falsifiers.md`
|
||||
- `[2026-09-22]` ✅ **v1.0.0b1 — the v1 target staged as a beta, and a version that was two copies** — READ BEFORE DERIVING A VERSION FROM `importlib.metadata` HERE; it reports a different artifact, and `booth/__init__.py` turns out to be stdlib-only → `persistent-memory.d/2026-09-22-v1-staged-as-a-beta-and-a-second-copy-of-the-version.md`
|
||||
- `[2026-09-22]` ✅ **U7 landed — and the number that justified it did not reproduce** — all seven v1 units are in; READ BEFORE TRUSTING A MEASUREMENT INSIDE A CONTRACT, and before assuming a degeneracy guard covers the degeneracy you actually have → `persistent-memory.d/2026-09-22-u7-landed-and-a-table-that-did-not-reproduce.md`
|
||||
- `[2026-09-22]` ⚠ **A mutation harness certified a broken test, twice, for two reasons** — no green baseline, and the pyc cache silently reverting same-size mutations; READ BEFORE WRITING ONE → `persistent-memory.d/2026-09-22-a-mutation-harness-that-certified-a-broken-test.md`
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user