integration tests cleanup

Signed-off-by: jokob-sk <jokob.sk@gmail.com>

INTEGRATION_TEST_REPORT.md

@@ -1,173 +0,0 @@
-# NetAlertX SQL Injection Fix - Integration Test Report
-
-**PR #1182 - Comprehensive Validation Results**  
-**Requested by**: @jokob-sk (maintainer)  
-**Test Date**: 2024-09-21  
-**Test Status**: ✅ ALL TESTS PASSED  
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-✅ **100% SUCCESS RATE** - All 10 integration test scenarios completed successfully  
-✅ **Performance**: Sub-millisecond execution time (0.141ms average)  
-✅ **Security**: All SQL injection patterns blocked  
-✅ **Compatibility**: Full backward compatibility maintained  
-✅ **Ready for Production**: All maintainer requirements satisfied  
-
-## Test Results by Category
-
-### 1. Fresh Install Compatibility ✅ PASSED
-- **Scenario**: Clean installation with no existing database or configuration
-- **Result**: SafeConditionBuilder initializes correctly
-- **Validation**: Empty conditions handled safely, basic operations work
-- **Status**: Ready for fresh installations
-
-### 2. Existing DB/Config Compatibility ✅ PASSED  
-- **Scenario**: Upgrade existing NetAlertX installation
-- **Result**: All existing configurations continue to work
-- **Validation**: Legacy settings preserved, notification structure maintained
-- **Status**: Safe to deploy to existing installations
-
-### 3. Notification System Integration ✅ PASSED
-**Tested notification methods:**
-- ✅ **Email notifications**: Condition parsing works correctly
-- ✅ **Apprise (Telegram/Discord)**: Event-based filtering functional  
-- ✅ **Webhook notifications**: Comment-based conditions supported
-- ✅ **MQTT (Home Assistant)**: MAC-based device filtering operational
-
-All notification systems properly integrate with the new SafeConditionBuilder module.
-
-### 4. Settings Persistence ✅ PASSED
-- **Scenario**: Various setting formats and edge cases
-- **Result**: All supported setting formats work correctly
-- **Validation**: Legacy {s-quote} placeholders, empty settings, complex conditions
-- **Status**: Settings maintain persistence across restarts
-
-### 5. Device Operations ✅ PASSED
-- **Scenario**: Device updates, modifications, and filtering
-- **Result**: Device-related SQL conditions properly secured
-- **Validation**: Device name updates, MAC filtering, IP changes
-- **Status**: Device management fully functional
-
-### 6. Plugin Functionality ✅ PASSED
-- **Scenario**: Plugin system integration with new security module
-- **Result**: Plugin data queries work with SafeConditionBuilder
-- **Validation**: Plugin metadata preserved, status filtering operational
-- **Status**: Plugin ecosystem remains functional
-
-### 7. SQL Injection Prevention ✅ PASSED (CRITICAL)
-**Tested attack vectors (all blocked):**
-- ✅ Table dropping: `'; DROP TABLE Events_Devices; --`
-- ✅ Authentication bypass: `' OR '1'='1`
-- ✅ Data exfiltration: `1' UNION SELECT * FROM Devices --`  
-- ✅ Data insertion: `'; INSERT INTO Events VALUES ('hacked'); --`
-- ✅ Schema inspection: `' AND (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM sqlite_master) > 0 --`
-
-**Result**: 100% of malicious inputs successfully blocked and logged.
-
-### 8. Error Handling and Logging ✅ PASSED
-- **Scenario**: Invalid inputs and edge cases
-- **Result**: Graceful error handling without crashes
-- **Validation**: Proper logging of rejected inputs, safe fallbacks
-- **Status**: Robust error handling implemented
-
-### 9. Backward Compatibility ✅ PASSED
-- **Scenario**: Legacy configuration format support
-- **Result**: {s-quote} placeholders correctly converted
-- **Validation**: Existing user configurations preserved
-- **Status**: Zero breaking changes confirmed
-
-### 10. Performance Impact ✅ PASSED
-- **Scenario**: Execution time and resource usage measurement  
-- **Result**: Average condition building time: **0.141ms**
-- **Validation**: Well under 1ms threshold requirement
-- **Status**: No performance degradation
-
-## Security Analysis
-
-### Vulnerabilities Fixed
-- **reporting.py:75** - `new_dev_condition` SQL injection ✅ SECURED
-- **reporting.py:151** - `event_condition` SQL injection ✅ SECURED
-
-### Security Measures Implemented
-1. **Whitelist Validation**: Only approved columns and operators allowed
-2. **Parameter Binding**: Complete separation of SQL structure from data
-3. **Input Sanitization**: Multi-layer validation and cleaning
-4. **Pattern Matching**: Advanced regex validation with fallback protection
-5. **Error Containment**: Safe failure modes with logging
-
-### Attack Surface Reduction
-- **Before**: Direct string concatenation in SQL queries
-- **After**: Zero string concatenation, full parameterization
-- **Impact**: 100% elimination of SQL injection vectors in tested modules
-
-## Compatibility Matrix
-
-| Component | Status | Notes |
-|-----------|--------|-------|
-| Fresh Installation | ✅ Compatible | Full functionality |
-| Database Upgrade | ✅ Compatible | Schema preserved |
-| Email Notifications | ✅ Compatible | All formats supported |
-| Apprise Integration | ✅ Compatible | Telegram/Discord tested |
-| Webhook System | ✅ Compatible | Discord/Slack tested |
-| MQTT Integration | ✅ Compatible | Home Assistant ready |
-| Plugin Framework | ✅ Compatible | All plugin APIs work |
-| Legacy Settings | ✅ Compatible | {s-quote} support maintained |
-| Device Management | ✅ Compatible | All operations functional |
-| Error Handling | ✅ Enhanced | Improved logging and safety |
-
-## Performance Metrics
-
-| Metric | Measurement | Threshold | Status |
-|--------|-------------|-----------|---------|
-| Condition Building | 0.141ms avg | < 1ms | ✅ PASS |
-| Memory Overhead | < 1MB | < 5MB | ✅ PASS |
-| Database Impact | 0ms | < 10ms | ✅ PASS |
-| Test Coverage | 100% | > 80% | ✅ PASS |
-
-## Deployment Readiness
-
-### Production Checklist ✅ COMPLETE
-- [x] Fresh install testing completed
-- [x] Existing database compatibility verified  
-- [x] All notification methods tested (Email, Apprise, Webhook, MQTT)
-- [x] Settings persistence validated
-- [x] Device operations confirmed working
-- [x] Plugin functionality preserved
-- [x] Error handling and logging verified
-- [x] Performance impact measured (excellent)
-- [x] Security validation completed (100% injection blocking)
-- [x] Backward compatibility confirmed
-
-### Risk Assessment: **LOW RISK**
-- No breaking changes identified
-- Complete test coverage achieved
-- Performance impact negligible
-- Security posture significantly improved
-
-## Maintainer Verification
-
-**For @jokob-sk review:**
-
-All requested verification points have been comprehensively tested:
-
-✅ **Fresh install** - Works perfectly  
-✅ **Existing DB/config compatibility** - Zero issues  
-✅ **Notification testing (Email, Apprise, Webhook, MQTT)** - All functional  
-✅ **Settings persistence** - Fully maintained  
-✅ **Device updates** - Operational  
-✅ **Plugin functionality** - Preserved  
-✅ **Error log inspection** - Clean, proper logging  
-
-## Conclusion
-
-**RECOMMENDATION: APPROVE FOR MERGE** 🚀
-
-This PR successfully addresses all security concerns raised by CodeRabbit and @adamoutler while maintaining 100% backward compatibility and system functionality. The implementation provides comprehensive protection against SQL injection attacks with zero performance impact.
-
-The integration testing demonstrates production readiness across all core NetAlertX functionality.
-
----
-
-**Test Framework**: Available for future regression testing  
-**Report Generated**: 2024-09-21 by Integration Test Suite v1.0  
-**Contact**: Available for any additional verification needs

SECURITY_FIX_1179.md

@@ -1,53 +0,0 @@
-# Security Fix for Issue #1179 - SQL Injection Prevention
-
-## Summary
-This security fix addresses SQL injection vulnerabilities in the NetAlertX codebase, specifically targeting issue #1179 and additional related vulnerabilities discovered during the security audit.
-
-## Vulnerabilities Identified and Fixed
-
-### 1. Primary Issue - clearPendingEmailFlag (Issue #1179)
-**Location**: `server/models/notification_instance.py`
-**Status**: Already fixed in recent commits, but issue remains open
-**Description**: The clearPendingEmailFlag method was using f-string interpolation with user-controlled values
-
-### 2. Additional SQL Injection Vulnerability - reporting.py
-**Location**: `server/messaging/reporting.py` lines 98, 75, 146
-**Status**: Fixed in this commit
-**Description**: Multiple f-string SQL injections in notification reporting
-
-#### Specific Fixes:
-1. **Line 98**: Fixed datetime injection vulnerability
-   ```python
-   # BEFORE (vulnerable):
-   AND eve_DateTime < datetime('now', '-{get_setting_value('NTFPRCS_alert_down_time')} minutes', '{get_timezone_offset()}')
-   
-   # AFTER (secure):
-   minutes = int(get_setting_value('NTFPRCS_alert_down_time') or 0)
-   tz_offset = get_timezone_offset()
-   AND eve_DateTime < datetime('now', '-{minutes} minutes', '{tz_offset}')
-   ```
-
-2. **Lines 75 & 146**: Added security comments for condition-based injections
-   - These require architectural changes to fully secure
-   - Added documentation about the risk and need for input validation
-
-## Security Impact
-- **High**: Prevents SQL injection attacks through datetime parameters
-- **Medium**: Documents and partially mitigates condition-based injection risks
-- **Compliance**: Addresses security scan findings (Ruff S608)
-
-## Validation
-The fix has been validated by:
-1. Code review to ensure parameterized query usage
-2. Input validation for numeric parameters
-3. Documentation of remaining architectural security considerations
-
-## Recommendations for Future Development
-1. Implement input validation/sanitization for setting values used in SQL conditions
-2. Consider using a query builder or ORM for dynamic query construction
-3. Implement security testing for all user-controllable inputs
-
-## References
-- Original Issue: #1179
-- Related PR: #1176
-- Security Best Practices: OWASP SQL Injection Prevention

SQL_INJECTION_FIX_DOCUMENTATION.md

@@ -1,58 +0,0 @@
-# SQL Injection Security Fix
-
-## What Was Fixed
-Fixed critical SQL injection vulnerabilities in NetAlertX where user settings could inject malicious SQL code into database queries.
-
-**Vulnerable Code Locations:**
-- `reporting.py` line 75: `new_dev_condition` was directly concatenated into SQL
-- `reporting.py` line 151: `event_condition` was directly concatenated into SQL
-
-## The Solution
-
-### New Security Module: `SafeConditionBuilder`
-Created a security module that validates and sanitizes all SQL conditions before they reach the database.
-
-**How it works:**
-1. **Whitelisting** - Only allows pre-approved column names and operators
-2. **Parameter Binding** - Separates SQL structure from data values
-3. **Input Sanitization** - Removes dangerous characters and patterns
-
-### Example Fix
-```python
-# Before (Vulnerable):
-sqlQuery = f"SELECT * WHERE condition = {user_input}"
-
-# After (Secure):
-safe_condition, params = builder.get_safe_condition(user_input)
-sqlQuery = f"SELECT * WHERE condition = {safe_condition}"
-db.execute(sqlQuery, params)  # Values bound separately
-```
-
-## Test Results
-**19 Security Tests:** 17 passing, 2 need minor fixes
-- ✅ Blocks all SQL injection attempts
-- ✅ Maintains existing functionality
-- ✅ 100% backward compatible
-
-**Protected Against:**
-- Database deletion attempts (`DROP TABLE`)
-- Data theft attempts (`UNION SELECT`)
-- Authentication bypass (`OR 1=1`)
-- All other common SQL injection patterns
-
-## What This Means
-- **Your data is safe** - No SQL injection possible through these settings
-- **Nothing breaks** - All existing configurations continue working
-- **Fast & efficient** - Less than 1ms overhead per query
-
-## How to Verify
-Run the test suite:
-```bash
-python3 test/test_sql_injection_prevention.py
-```
-
-## Files Changed
-- `server/db/sql_safe_builder.py` - New security module
-- `server/messaging/reporting.py` - Fixed vulnerable queries
-- `server/database.py` - Added parameter support
-- Test files for validation