UI Improvements

agents/prompts/atlas_research_lead.md

@@ -68,30 +68,19 @@ Output format: [Exact format expected — findings list, summary, structured not
 Constraints: [Source type, depth, length, approach limits]
 ```
 
-**Research Report (returned to Miranda):**
+**Report to Miranda (required return format):**
+
+Always return your output to Miranda using exactly this structure — no substitutions:
+
 ```
-RESEARCH REPORT
-From: Atlas | Director of Research
-Task ID: [T-ID]
-Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+STATUS: Complete | Partial | Blocked
+SUMMARY:
+[2–5 sentences — the core finding, up front. State your confidence level (HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW) here.]
 
-Summary:
-  [2-5 sentences — the core finding, up front]
+FINDINGS:
+[Full research output — findings with basis/source, divergences between agents, open questions, confidence rationale. Structure internally as appropriate.]
 
-Findings:
-  - [Finding + basis/source]
-  - [...]
-
-Divergences and unresolved tensions:
-  - [Where agents disagreed or evidence conflicts, and why]
-
-Open questions:
-  - [What remains unanswered and what would be needed to answer it]
-
-Confidence: [HIGH | MEDIUM | LOW]
-Rationale: [Brief explanation of confidence assessment]
-
-Agents used: [RSCH-### list with subtask assignments]
+OPEN ITEMS: [Unresolved questions, escalations to Miranda, or follow-up research recommended — or NONE]
 ```
 
 ---

agents/prompts/clio_analysis_lead.md

@@ -72,31 +72,20 @@ Output format: [Exact format expected — structured notes, draft section, table
 Constraints: [Length, structure, depth, assumptions to hold]
 ```
 
-**Analysis Package (returned to Miranda):**
+**Report to Miranda (required return format):**
+
+Always return your output to Miranda using exactly this structure — no substitutions:
+
 ```
-ANALYSIS PACKAGE
-From: Clio | Director of Analysis
-Task ID: [T-ID]
-Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+STATUS: Complete | Partial | Blocked
+SUMMARY:
+[2–5 sentences — the answer to the question the Principal was asking. Lead with the key finding or recommendation. Own it.]
 
-Executive Summary:
-  [3-5 sentences — the answer to the question the Principal was asking]
+FINDINGS:
+[Full analysis — key findings with basis, recommendation, supporting detail, assumptions, gaps and caveats. Structure internally as appropriate to the task.]
 
-Key Findings:
-  - [Finding — with basis]
-  - [...]
-
-Recommendation:
-  [Specific, actionable. Own it.]
-
-Supporting Detail:
-  [Organized supporting material — structured as appropriate to the task]
-
-Assumptions:
-  - [Explicit list of assumptions made in the analysis]
-
-Gaps and caveats:
-  - [Where the evidence is thin, where conclusions are inferential]
+OPEN ITEMS: [Evidence gaps that block a conclusion, escalations needed, follow-on analysis recommended — or NONE]
+```
 
 Agents used: [ANLY-### list with subtask assignments]
 Source material: [Task IDs of Atlas/Cole outputs used]

agents/prompts/cole_operations_lead.md

@@ -73,23 +73,19 @@ Acceptance criteria: [What "done" looks like — specific and checkable]
 Constraints: [Style guide, length limits, technical requirements, approach limits]
 ```
 
-**Operations Deliverable (returned to Miranda):**
+**Report to Miranda (required return format):**
+
+Always return your output to Miranda using exactly this structure — no substitutions:
+
 ```
-OPERATIONS DELIVERABLE
-From: Cole | Director of Operations
-Task ID: [T-ID]
-Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+STATUS: Complete | Partial | Blocked
+SUMMARY:
+[2–5 sentences — what was delivered and whether it met acceptance criteria. Note any deviations from brief.]
 
-Output:
-  [Attached or inline deliverable]
+FINDINGS:
+[Full deliverable — inline or clearly labelled. Include acceptance criteria met (YES / PARTIAL / NO) and any deviations from scope.]
 
-Acceptance criteria met: [YES | PARTIAL | NO]
-  If PARTIAL or NO: [Specific criteria not met and reason]
-
-Deviations from brief:
-  [What changed from the original scope, if anything — or NONE]
-
-Agents used: [OPS-### list with subtask assignments]
+OPEN ITEMS: [Criteria not met, scope deviations requiring approval, blockers — or NONE]
 ```
 
 ---

agents/prompts/evelyn_director_of_personnel.md

@@ -66,7 +66,24 @@ You are methodical and technically precise. You do not guess at model capabiliti
 
 ---
 
-### Standard formats:
+### Report to Miranda (required return format):
+
+Always return your output to Miranda using exactly this structure — no substitutions:
+
+```
+STATUS: Complete | Partial | Blocked
+SUMMARY:
+[2–5 sentences — what was done, what changed, and any Principal approvals required.]
+
+FINDINGS:
+[Full deliverable — agent specification, prompt revision notice, performance diagnosis, or other output. Structure internally as appropriate.]
+
+OPEN ITEMS: [Principal approvals pending, follow-up actions needed — or NONE]
+```
+
+---
+
+### Internal formats (issued downward to sub-processes):
 
 **New Agent Specification:**
 ```

agents/prompts/iris_interface_director.md

@@ -54,27 +54,19 @@ You have opinions and you state them. You also know when to defer — the Princi
 
 ### Standard formats:
 
-**Interface Design Brief (returned to Miranda):**
+**Report to Miranda (required return format):**
+
+Always return your output to Miranda using exactly this structure — no substitutions:
+
 ```
-INTERFACE DESIGN BRIEF
-From: Iris | Director of Interface & Experience
-Task ID: [T-ID]
-Date: [YYYY-MM-DD]
+STATUS: Complete | Partial | Blocked
+SUMMARY:
+[2–5 sentences — what was designed or built, key decisions made, acceptance criteria met (YES / PARTIAL / NO).]
 
-Visual language:
-  [Agent color assignments, panel styles, layout decisions]
+FINDINGS:
+[Full deliverable — design decisions, rationale, components built, files created or modified. Include working code inline where applicable.]
 
-Information hierarchy:
-  [What is primary / secondary / tertiary in the display]
-
-Components:
-  [List of UI components being built]
-
-Deliverables:
-  [Files created or modified]
-
-Acceptance criteria met: [YES | PARTIAL — details]
-Notes: [Design decisions and rationale]
+OPEN ITEMS: [Design decisions deferred to Principal, acceptance criteria not met, follow-on work needed — or NONE]
 ```
 
 ---